Cargando…

Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies

BACKGROUND: Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed supp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Arias, David, Molina-Pérez, Alberto, Hannikainen, Ivar R., Delgado, Janet, Söchtig, Benjamin, Wöhlke, Sabine, Schicktanz, Silke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252686
_version_ 1783703425768226816
author Rodríguez-Arias, David
Molina-Pérez, Alberto
Hannikainen, Ivar R.
Delgado, Janet
Söchtig, Benjamin
Wöhlke, Sabine
Schicktanz, Silke
author_facet Rodríguez-Arias, David
Molina-Pérez, Alberto
Hannikainen, Ivar R.
Delgado, Janet
Söchtig, Benjamin
Wöhlke, Sabine
Schicktanz, Silke
author_sort Rodríguez-Arias, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed support, and examine national differences on this measure through a quantitative survey of OP policy informedness and preferences in seven European countries. METHODS: Between 2017–2019, we conducted a convenience sample survey of students (n = 2006) in Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Slovenia (SI) and Spain (ES), asking participants about their donation preferences, as well as their beliefs and views about the policy in place. From these measures, we computed indices of informedness, policy support, and fulfilment of unexpressed preferences, which we compared across countries and consent systems. RESULTS: Our study introduces a tool for analyzing policy governance in the context of OP. Wide variation in policy awareness was observed: Most respondents in DK, DE, AT and BE correctly identified the policy in place, while those in SI, GR and ES did not. Respondents in opt-out countries (AT, BE, ES and GR) tended to support the policy in place (with one exception, i.e., SI), whereas those in opt-in countries (DE and DK) overwhelmingly opposed it. These results reveal stark differences in governance quality across countries and consent policies: We found a preponderance of informed opposition in opt-in countries and a general tendency towards support–either informed or uninformed–in opt-out countries. We also found informed divergence in opt-in countries and a tendency for convergence–either informed or uninformed–among opt-out countries. CONCLUSION: Our study offers a novel tool for analyzing governance quality and illustrates, in the context of OP, how the strengths and weaknesses of different policy implementations can be estimated and compared using quantitative survey data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8177644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81776442021-06-07 Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies Rodríguez-Arias, David Molina-Pérez, Alberto Hannikainen, Ivar R. Delgado, Janet Söchtig, Benjamin Wöhlke, Sabine Schicktanz, Silke PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed support, and examine national differences on this measure through a quantitative survey of OP policy informedness and preferences in seven European countries. METHODS: Between 2017–2019, we conducted a convenience sample survey of students (n = 2006) in Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Slovenia (SI) and Spain (ES), asking participants about their donation preferences, as well as their beliefs and views about the policy in place. From these measures, we computed indices of informedness, policy support, and fulfilment of unexpressed preferences, which we compared across countries and consent systems. RESULTS: Our study introduces a tool for analyzing policy governance in the context of OP. Wide variation in policy awareness was observed: Most respondents in DK, DE, AT and BE correctly identified the policy in place, while those in SI, GR and ES did not. Respondents in opt-out countries (AT, BE, ES and GR) tended to support the policy in place (with one exception, i.e., SI), whereas those in opt-in countries (DE and DK) overwhelmingly opposed it. These results reveal stark differences in governance quality across countries and consent policies: We found a preponderance of informed opposition in opt-in countries and a general tendency towards support–either informed or uninformed–in opt-out countries. We also found informed divergence in opt-in countries and a tendency for convergence–either informed or uninformed–among opt-out countries. CONCLUSION: Our study offers a novel tool for analyzing governance quality and illustrates, in the context of OP, how the strengths and weaknesses of different policy implementations can be estimated and compared using quantitative survey data. Public Library of Science 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8177644/ /pubmed/34086783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252686 Text en © 2021 Rodríguez-Arias et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodríguez-Arias, David
Molina-Pérez, Alberto
Hannikainen, Ivar R.
Delgado, Janet
Söchtig, Benjamin
Wöhlke, Sabine
Schicktanz, Silke
Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
title Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
title_full Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
title_fullStr Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
title_full_unstemmed Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
title_short Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
title_sort governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252686
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezariasdavid governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies
AT molinaperezalberto governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies
AT hannikainenivarr governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies
AT delgadojanet governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies
AT sochtigbenjamin governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies
AT wohlkesabine governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies
AT schicktanzsilke governancequalityindicatorsfororganprocurementpolicies