Cargando…
Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01170 |
_version_ | 1783703467304419328 |
---|---|
author | Burnett, Alan K. Russell, Nigel H. Hills, Robert K. Knapper, Stephen Freeman, Sylvie Huntly, Brian Clark, Richard E. Thomas, Ian F. Kjeldsen, Lars McMullin, Mary Frances Drummond, Mark Kell, Jonathan Spearing, Ruth |
author_facet | Burnett, Alan K. Russell, Nigel H. Hills, Robert K. Knapper, Stephen Freeman, Sylvie Huntly, Brian Clark, Richard E. Thomas, Ian F. Kjeldsen, Lars McMullin, Mary Frances Drummond, Mark Kell, Jonathan Spearing, Ruth |
author_sort | Burnett, Alan K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received two induction courses based on daunorubicin and cytarabine (Ara-C), usually with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Following remission, 1,017 patients were randomly assigned to a third course, MACE (amsacrine, Ara-C, and etoposide), plus a fourth course of MidAc (mitoxantrone and Ara-C) and following an amendment to one or two courses of high-dose Ara-C. Primary end points were cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were correlated with patient characteristics, mutations, cytogenetics, induction treatments, and measurable residual disease (MRD) postinduction. RESULTS: In logrank analyses, CIR and RFS at 5 years were improved in recipients of four courses (50% v 58%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [0.69-0.97], P = .02 and 43% v 36%: HR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], P = .03, respectively). While OS was not significantly better (63% v 57%: HR 0.84 [0.69-1.03], P = .09), the noninferiority of three courses to four courses was not established. The impact on relapse was only significant when the fourth course was Ara-C. In exploratory analyses, although MRD impacted survival, a fourth course had no effect in either MRD-positive or MRD-negative patients. A fourth course was beneficial in patients who lacked a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, had < 3 mutations in other genes, or had a presenting WBC of < 10 × 10(9) L(−1). CONCLUSION: Although a fourth course of high-dose Ara-C reduced CIR and improved RFS, it did not result in a significant OS benefit. Subsets including those with favorable cytogenetics, those lacking a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, or those with < 3 other mutations may derive survival benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8177881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81778812022-03-10 Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses Burnett, Alan K. Russell, Nigel H. Hills, Robert K. Knapper, Stephen Freeman, Sylvie Huntly, Brian Clark, Richard E. Thomas, Ian F. Kjeldsen, Lars McMullin, Mary Frances Drummond, Mark Kell, Jonathan Spearing, Ruth J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received two induction courses based on daunorubicin and cytarabine (Ara-C), usually with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Following remission, 1,017 patients were randomly assigned to a third course, MACE (amsacrine, Ara-C, and etoposide), plus a fourth course of MidAc (mitoxantrone and Ara-C) and following an amendment to one or two courses of high-dose Ara-C. Primary end points were cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were correlated with patient characteristics, mutations, cytogenetics, induction treatments, and measurable residual disease (MRD) postinduction. RESULTS: In logrank analyses, CIR and RFS at 5 years were improved in recipients of four courses (50% v 58%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [0.69-0.97], P = .02 and 43% v 36%: HR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], P = .03, respectively). While OS was not significantly better (63% v 57%: HR 0.84 [0.69-1.03], P = .09), the noninferiority of three courses to four courses was not established. The impact on relapse was only significant when the fourth course was Ara-C. In exploratory analyses, although MRD impacted survival, a fourth course had no effect in either MRD-positive or MRD-negative patients. A fourth course was beneficial in patients who lacked a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, had < 3 mutations in other genes, or had a presenting WBC of < 10 × 10(9) L(−1). CONCLUSION: Although a fourth course of high-dose Ara-C reduced CIR and improved RFS, it did not result in a significant OS benefit. Subsets including those with favorable cytogenetics, those lacking a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, or those with < 3 other mutations may derive survival benefit. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021-03-10 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8177881/ /pubmed/33356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01170 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Burnett, Alan K. Russell, Nigel H. Hills, Robert K. Knapper, Stephen Freeman, Sylvie Huntly, Brian Clark, Richard E. Thomas, Ian F. Kjeldsen, Lars McMullin, Mary Frances Drummond, Mark Kell, Jonathan Spearing, Ruth Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses |
title | Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses |
title_full | Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses |
title_fullStr | Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses |
title_short | Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses |
title_sort | defining the optimal total number of chemotherapy courses in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparison of three versus four courses |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burnettalank definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT russellnigelh definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT hillsrobertk definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT knapperstephen definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT freemansylvie definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT huntlybrian definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT clarkricharde definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT thomasianf definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT kjeldsenlars definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT mcmullinmaryfrances definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT drummondmark definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT kelljonathan definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses AT spearingruth definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses |