Cargando…

Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses

The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burnett, Alan K., Russell, Nigel H., Hills, Robert K., Knapper, Stephen, Freeman, Sylvie, Huntly, Brian, Clark, Richard E., Thomas, Ian F., Kjeldsen, Lars, McMullin, Mary Frances, Drummond, Mark, Kell, Jonathan, Spearing, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01170
_version_ 1783703467304419328
author Burnett, Alan K.
Russell, Nigel H.
Hills, Robert K.
Knapper, Stephen
Freeman, Sylvie
Huntly, Brian
Clark, Richard E.
Thomas, Ian F.
Kjeldsen, Lars
McMullin, Mary Frances
Drummond, Mark
Kell, Jonathan
Spearing, Ruth
author_facet Burnett, Alan K.
Russell, Nigel H.
Hills, Robert K.
Knapper, Stephen
Freeman, Sylvie
Huntly, Brian
Clark, Richard E.
Thomas, Ian F.
Kjeldsen, Lars
McMullin, Mary Frances
Drummond, Mark
Kell, Jonathan
Spearing, Ruth
author_sort Burnett, Alan K.
collection PubMed
description The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received two induction courses based on daunorubicin and cytarabine (Ara-C), usually with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Following remission, 1,017 patients were randomly assigned to a third course, MACE (amsacrine, Ara-C, and etoposide), plus a fourth course of MidAc (mitoxantrone and Ara-C) and following an amendment to one or two courses of high-dose Ara-C. Primary end points were cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were correlated with patient characteristics, mutations, cytogenetics, induction treatments, and measurable residual disease (MRD) postinduction. RESULTS: In logrank analyses, CIR and RFS at 5 years were improved in recipients of four courses (50% v 58%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [0.69-0.97], P = .02 and 43% v 36%: HR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], P = .03, respectively). While OS was not significantly better (63% v 57%: HR 0.84 [0.69-1.03], P = .09), the noninferiority of three courses to four courses was not established. The impact on relapse was only significant when the fourth course was Ara-C. In exploratory analyses, although MRD impacted survival, a fourth course had no effect in either MRD-positive or MRD-negative patients. A fourth course was beneficial in patients who lacked a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, had < 3 mutations in other genes, or had a presenting WBC of < 10 × 10(9) L(−1). CONCLUSION: Although a fourth course of high-dose Ara-C reduced CIR and improved RFS, it did not result in a significant OS benefit. Subsets including those with favorable cytogenetics, those lacking a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, or those with < 3 other mutations may derive survival benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8177881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81778812022-03-10 Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses Burnett, Alan K. Russell, Nigel H. Hills, Robert K. Knapper, Stephen Freeman, Sylvie Huntly, Brian Clark, Richard E. Thomas, Ian F. Kjeldsen, Lars McMullin, Mary Frances Drummond, Mark Kell, Jonathan Spearing, Ruth J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received two induction courses based on daunorubicin and cytarabine (Ara-C), usually with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Following remission, 1,017 patients were randomly assigned to a third course, MACE (amsacrine, Ara-C, and etoposide), plus a fourth course of MidAc (mitoxantrone and Ara-C) and following an amendment to one or two courses of high-dose Ara-C. Primary end points were cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were correlated with patient characteristics, mutations, cytogenetics, induction treatments, and measurable residual disease (MRD) postinduction. RESULTS: In logrank analyses, CIR and RFS at 5 years were improved in recipients of four courses (50% v 58%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [0.69-0.97], P = .02 and 43% v 36%: HR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], P = .03, respectively). While OS was not significantly better (63% v 57%: HR 0.84 [0.69-1.03], P = .09), the noninferiority of three courses to four courses was not established. The impact on relapse was only significant when the fourth course was Ara-C. In exploratory analyses, although MRD impacted survival, a fourth course had no effect in either MRD-positive or MRD-negative patients. A fourth course was beneficial in patients who lacked a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, had < 3 mutations in other genes, or had a presenting WBC of < 10 × 10(9) L(−1). CONCLUSION: Although a fourth course of high-dose Ara-C reduced CIR and improved RFS, it did not result in a significant OS benefit. Subsets including those with favorable cytogenetics, those lacking a mutation of FLT3 or NPM1, or those with < 3 other mutations may derive survival benefit. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021-03-10 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8177881/ /pubmed/33356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01170 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Burnett, Alan K.
Russell, Nigel H.
Hills, Robert K.
Knapper, Stephen
Freeman, Sylvie
Huntly, Brian
Clark, Richard E.
Thomas, Ian F.
Kjeldsen, Lars
McMullin, Mary Frances
Drummond, Mark
Kell, Jonathan
Spearing, Ruth
Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
title Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
title_full Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
title_fullStr Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
title_full_unstemmed Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
title_short Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses
title_sort defining the optimal total number of chemotherapy courses in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparison of three versus four courses
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01170
work_keys_str_mv AT burnettalank definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT russellnigelh definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT hillsrobertk definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT knapperstephen definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT freemansylvie definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT huntlybrian definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT clarkricharde definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT thomasianf definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT kjeldsenlars definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT mcmullinmaryfrances definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT drummondmark definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT kelljonathan definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses
AT spearingruth definingtheoptimaltotalnumberofchemotherapycoursesinyoungerpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonofthreeversusfourcourses