Cargando…

Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms

Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Qianru, Ye, Chaoxiong, Gu, Simeng, Hu, Zhonghua, Lei, Yi, Li, Xueyan, Huang, Lihui, Liu, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066
_version_ 1783703497492922368
author Xu, Qianru
Ye, Chaoxiong
Gu, Simeng
Hu, Zhonghua
Lei, Yi
Li, Xueyan
Huang, Lihui
Liu, Qiang
author_facet Xu, Qianru
Ye, Chaoxiong
Gu, Simeng
Hu, Zhonghua
Lei, Yi
Li, Xueyan
Huang, Lihui
Liu, Qiang
author_sort Xu, Qianru
collection PubMed
description Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negative bias and a positive bias toward emotional faces (e.g., angry faces or happy faces) in the attention and VWM fields. We found that the classical paradigms—that is, the visual search paradigm in attention and the change detection paradigm in VWM—are considerably similar. The settings of these paradigms could therefore be responsible for the contradictory results. In this paper, we compare previous controversial results from behavioral and neuroscience studies using these two paradigms. We suggest three possible contributing factors that have significant impacts on the contradictory conclusions regarding different emotional bias effects; these factors are stimulus choice, experimental setting, and cognitive process. We also propose new research directions and guidelines for future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8178010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81780102021-06-15 Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms Xu, Qianru Ye, Chaoxiong Gu, Simeng Hu, Zhonghua Lei, Yi Li, Xueyan Huang, Lihui Liu, Qiang Neural Plast Review Article Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negative bias and a positive bias toward emotional faces (e.g., angry faces or happy faces) in the attention and VWM fields. We found that the classical paradigms—that is, the visual search paradigm in attention and the change detection paradigm in VWM—are considerably similar. The settings of these paradigms could therefore be responsible for the contradictory results. In this paper, we compare previous controversial results from behavioral and neuroscience studies using these two paradigms. We suggest three possible contributing factors that have significant impacts on the contradictory conclusions regarding different emotional bias effects; these factors are stimulus choice, experimental setting, and cognitive process. We also propose new research directions and guidelines for future studies. Hindawi 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8178010/ /pubmed/34135956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qianru Xu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Xu, Qianru
Ye, Chaoxiong
Gu, Simeng
Hu, Zhonghua
Lei, Yi
Li, Xueyan
Huang, Lihui
Liu, Qiang
Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
title Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
title_full Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
title_fullStr Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
title_short Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
title_sort negative and positive bias for emotional faces: evidence from the attention and working memory paradigms
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066
work_keys_str_mv AT xuqianru negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT yechaoxiong negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT gusimeng negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT huzhonghua negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT leiyi negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT lixueyan negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT huanglihui negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms
AT liuqiang negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms