Cargando…
Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066 |
_version_ | 1783703497492922368 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Qianru Ye, Chaoxiong Gu, Simeng Hu, Zhonghua Lei, Yi Li, Xueyan Huang, Lihui Liu, Qiang |
author_facet | Xu, Qianru Ye, Chaoxiong Gu, Simeng Hu, Zhonghua Lei, Yi Li, Xueyan Huang, Lihui Liu, Qiang |
author_sort | Xu, Qianru |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negative bias and a positive bias toward emotional faces (e.g., angry faces or happy faces) in the attention and VWM fields. We found that the classical paradigms—that is, the visual search paradigm in attention and the change detection paradigm in VWM—are considerably similar. The settings of these paradigms could therefore be responsible for the contradictory results. In this paper, we compare previous controversial results from behavioral and neuroscience studies using these two paradigms. We suggest three possible contributing factors that have significant impacts on the contradictory conclusions regarding different emotional bias effects; these factors are stimulus choice, experimental setting, and cognitive process. We also propose new research directions and guidelines for future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8178010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81780102021-06-15 Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms Xu, Qianru Ye, Chaoxiong Gu, Simeng Hu, Zhonghua Lei, Yi Li, Xueyan Huang, Lihui Liu, Qiang Neural Plast Review Article Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negative bias and a positive bias toward emotional faces (e.g., angry faces or happy faces) in the attention and VWM fields. We found that the classical paradigms—that is, the visual search paradigm in attention and the change detection paradigm in VWM—are considerably similar. The settings of these paradigms could therefore be responsible for the contradictory results. In this paper, we compare previous controversial results from behavioral and neuroscience studies using these two paradigms. We suggest three possible contributing factors that have significant impacts on the contradictory conclusions regarding different emotional bias effects; these factors are stimulus choice, experimental setting, and cognitive process. We also propose new research directions and guidelines for future studies. Hindawi 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8178010/ /pubmed/34135956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qianru Xu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Xu, Qianru Ye, Chaoxiong Gu, Simeng Hu, Zhonghua Lei, Yi Li, Xueyan Huang, Lihui Liu, Qiang Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms |
title | Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms |
title_full | Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms |
title_fullStr | Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms |
title_full_unstemmed | Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms |
title_short | Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms |
title_sort | negative and positive bias for emotional faces: evidence from the attention and working memory paradigms |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuqianru negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT yechaoxiong negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT gusimeng negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT huzhonghua negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT leiyi negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT lixueyan negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT huanglihui negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms AT liuqiang negativeandpositivebiasforemotionalfacesevidencefromtheattentionandworkingmemoryparadigms |