Cargando…

Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation

Genomics-based, longitudinal comparisons between ex situ and in situ agrobiodiversity conservation strategies can contribute to a better understanding of their underlying effects. However, landrace designations, ambiguous common names, and gaps in sampling information complicate the identification o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLean-Rodríguez, Francis Denisse, Costich, Denise Elston, Camacho-Villa, Tania Carolina, Pè, Mario Enrico, Dell’Acqua, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-021-00423-y
_version_ 1783703554250244096
author McLean-Rodríguez, Francis Denisse
Costich, Denise Elston
Camacho-Villa, Tania Carolina
Pè, Mario Enrico
Dell’Acqua, Matteo
author_facet McLean-Rodríguez, Francis Denisse
Costich, Denise Elston
Camacho-Villa, Tania Carolina
Pè, Mario Enrico
Dell’Acqua, Matteo
author_sort McLean-Rodríguez, Francis Denisse
collection PubMed
description Genomics-based, longitudinal comparisons between ex situ and in situ agrobiodiversity conservation strategies can contribute to a better understanding of their underlying effects. However, landrace designations, ambiguous common names, and gaps in sampling information complicate the identification of matching ex situ and in situ seed lots. Here we report a 50-year longitudinal comparison of the genetic diversity of a set of 13 accessions from the state of Morelos, Mexico, conserved ex situ since 1967 and retrieved in situ from the same donor families in 2017. We interviewed farmer families who donated in situ landraces to understand their germplasm selection criteria. Samples were genotyped by sequencing, producing 74,739 SNPs. Comparing the two sample groups, we show that ex situ and in situ genome-wide diversity was similar. In situ samples had 3.1% fewer SNPs and lower pairwise genetic distances (F(st) 0.008–0.113) than ex situ samples (F(st) 0.031–0.128), but displayed the same heterozygosity. Despite genome-wide similarities across samples, we could identify several loci under selection when comparing in situ and ex situ seed lots, suggesting ongoing evolution in farmer fields. Eight loci in chromosomes 3, 5, 6, and 10 showed evidence of selection in situ that could be related with farmers’ selection criteria surveyed with focus groups and interviews at the sampling site in 2017, including wider kernels and larger ear size. Our results have implications for ex situ collection resampling strategies and the in situ conservation of threatened landraces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8178342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81783422021-06-07 Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation McLean-Rodríguez, Francis Denisse Costich, Denise Elston Camacho-Villa, Tania Carolina Pè, Mario Enrico Dell’Acqua, Matteo Heredity (Edinb) Article Genomics-based, longitudinal comparisons between ex situ and in situ agrobiodiversity conservation strategies can contribute to a better understanding of their underlying effects. However, landrace designations, ambiguous common names, and gaps in sampling information complicate the identification of matching ex situ and in situ seed lots. Here we report a 50-year longitudinal comparison of the genetic diversity of a set of 13 accessions from the state of Morelos, Mexico, conserved ex situ since 1967 and retrieved in situ from the same donor families in 2017. We interviewed farmer families who donated in situ landraces to understand their germplasm selection criteria. Samples were genotyped by sequencing, producing 74,739 SNPs. Comparing the two sample groups, we show that ex situ and in situ genome-wide diversity was similar. In situ samples had 3.1% fewer SNPs and lower pairwise genetic distances (F(st) 0.008–0.113) than ex situ samples (F(st) 0.031–0.128), but displayed the same heterozygosity. Despite genome-wide similarities across samples, we could identify several loci under selection when comparing in situ and ex situ seed lots, suggesting ongoing evolution in farmer fields. Eight loci in chromosomes 3, 5, 6, and 10 showed evidence of selection in situ that could be related with farmers’ selection criteria surveyed with focus groups and interviews at the sampling site in 2017, including wider kernels and larger ear size. Our results have implications for ex situ collection resampling strategies and the in situ conservation of threatened landraces. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-30 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8178342/ /pubmed/33785893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-021-00423-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McLean-Rodríguez, Francis Denisse
Costich, Denise Elston
Camacho-Villa, Tania Carolina
Pè, Mario Enrico
Dell’Acqua, Matteo
Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
title Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
title_full Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
title_fullStr Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
title_full_unstemmed Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
title_short Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
title_sort genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-021-00423-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleanrodriguezfrancisdenisse geneticdiversityandselectionsignaturesinmaizelandracescomparedacross50yearsofinsituandexsituconservation
AT costichdeniseelston geneticdiversityandselectionsignaturesinmaizelandracescomparedacross50yearsofinsituandexsituconservation
AT camachovillataniacarolina geneticdiversityandselectionsignaturesinmaizelandracescomparedacross50yearsofinsituandexsituconservation
AT pemarioenrico geneticdiversityandselectionsignaturesinmaizelandracescomparedacross50yearsofinsituandexsituconservation
AT dellacquamatteo geneticdiversityandselectionsignaturesinmaizelandracescomparedacross50yearsofinsituandexsituconservation