Cargando…

Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND: Bone quality influences humeral implant selection for shoulder arthroplasty. However, little is known about how well bone near the humeral resection represents more distal cancellous bone. This investigation aimed to quantify the correlations between the apparent density of sites near th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reeves, Jacob M., Vanasse, Tom, Roche, Chris, Athwal, George S., Johnson, James A., Faber, Kenneth J., Langohr, G. Daniel G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.001
_version_ 1783703602793021440
author Reeves, Jacob M.
Vanasse, Tom
Roche, Chris
Athwal, George S.
Johnson, James A.
Faber, Kenneth J.
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
author_facet Reeves, Jacob M.
Vanasse, Tom
Roche, Chris
Athwal, George S.
Johnson, James A.
Faber, Kenneth J.
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
author_sort Reeves, Jacob M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone quality influences humeral implant selection for shoulder arthroplasty. However, little is known about how well bone near the humeral resection represents more distal cancellous bone. This investigation aimed to quantify the correlations between the apparent density of sites near the humeral head resection plane and cancellous sites throughout the metaphysis. METHODS: Using computed tomography data from 98 subjects, apparent bone density was quantified in 65 regions throughout the proximal humerus. Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined comparing the density between samples from the humeral resection and all supporting regions beneath the resection. Mean correlation coefficients were compared for (i) each sample region with all support regions, (ii) pooling all sample regions within a slice, and (iii) considering sample regions correlated with only the support regions in the same anatomic section. RESULTS: Stronger correlations existed for bone sampled beneath the resection (0.33 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.88 ± 0.10), instead of from the resected humeral head (0.22 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.66 ± 0.14). None of sample region correlated strongly with all support regions; however, strong correlations existed when sample and support regions both came from the same anatomic section. DISCUSSION: Assessments of cancellous bone quality in the proximal humerus should be made beneath the humeral resection not in the resected humeral head; and each anatomic quadrant should be assessed independently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8178593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81785932021-06-15 Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus Reeves, Jacob M. Vanasse, Tom Roche, Chris Athwal, George S. Johnson, James A. Faber, Kenneth J. Langohr, G. Daniel G. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Bone quality influences humeral implant selection for shoulder arthroplasty. However, little is known about how well bone near the humeral resection represents more distal cancellous bone. This investigation aimed to quantify the correlations between the apparent density of sites near the humeral head resection plane and cancellous sites throughout the metaphysis. METHODS: Using computed tomography data from 98 subjects, apparent bone density was quantified in 65 regions throughout the proximal humerus. Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined comparing the density between samples from the humeral resection and all supporting regions beneath the resection. Mean correlation coefficients were compared for (i) each sample region with all support regions, (ii) pooling all sample regions within a slice, and (iii) considering sample regions correlated with only the support regions in the same anatomic section. RESULTS: Stronger correlations existed for bone sampled beneath the resection (0.33 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.88 ± 0.10), instead of from the resected humeral head (0.22 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.66 ± 0.14). None of sample region correlated strongly with all support regions; however, strong correlations existed when sample and support regions both came from the same anatomic section. DISCUSSION: Assessments of cancellous bone quality in the proximal humerus should be made beneath the humeral resection not in the resected humeral head; and each anatomic quadrant should be assessed independently. Elsevier 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8178593/ /pubmed/34136865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.001 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Reeves, Jacob M.
Vanasse, Tom
Roche, Chris
Athwal, George S.
Johnson, James A.
Faber, Kenneth J.
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
title Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
title_full Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
title_fullStr Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
title_full_unstemmed Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
title_short Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
title_sort regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.001
work_keys_str_mv AT reevesjacobm regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus
AT vanassetom regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus
AT rochechris regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus
AT athwalgeorges regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus
AT johnsonjamesa regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus
AT faberkennethj regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus
AT langohrgdanielg regionalapparentdensitycorrelationswithintheproximalhumerus