Cargando…

Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin

BACKGROUND: Based on the controversy over whether the extensor tendon is the only lesion of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow and numerous reports of concomitant lateral collateral ligament involvement, potential damage to the lateral collateral ligament complex should be considered for the treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noh, Young Min, Kong, Gyu Min, Moon, Sang Won, Jang, Hyo Seok, Kim, Seungchul, Bak, Gyeong Gu, Kim, Youngbok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.006
_version_ 1783703603024756736
author Noh, Young Min
Kong, Gyu Min
Moon, Sang Won
Jang, Hyo Seok
Kim, Seungchul
Bak, Gyeong Gu
Kim, Youngbok
author_facet Noh, Young Min
Kong, Gyu Min
Moon, Sang Won
Jang, Hyo Seok
Kim, Seungchul
Bak, Gyeong Gu
Kim, Youngbok
author_sort Noh, Young Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on the controversy over whether the extensor tendon is the only lesion of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow and numerous reports of concomitant lateral collateral ligament involvement, potential damage to the lateral collateral ligament complex should be considered for the treatment. METHODS: About 25 elbows in 23 patients (débridement group) and 22 elbows in 20 patients (reconstruction group) who were diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and had an average of 22 months of symptoms revealing anatomical lesion on MRI were included. The capitellum-sublime tubercle-radial head (CSR) angle was measured on both sides preoperatively, and the visual analog scale (VAS) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were measured over 12 months, postoperatively. RESULTS: The initial preoperative mean VAS was statistically significant with 4.6 in the débridement group and 6.5 in the reconstruction group (P < .05). Postoperative VAS was continuously decreased in both groups with no significant difference at each assessment period (P < .05) but showed more rapid improvement in the reconstruction group compared with the débridement group. For MEPS, the reconstruction group showed significant improvement during the follow-up periods, and at the final follow-up MEPS, 3 cases in the débridement group and 0 cases in the reconstruction group showed a poor result, which was considered as surgery failure. The CSR angle of the affected side (7.2 ± 1.9) was significantly larger than that of the normal side (3.6 ± 1.5) (P < .05) in the reconstruction group. Increased CSR by more than 5 degrees was identified as a significant predictive indicator for potential concomitant ligament insufficiency (area under curve = 0.875, P < .001) showing 80.9% of the sensitivity, 82.1% of the specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis, lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction added to the débridement of extensor origin may provide better results for the patients with suspicious lateral ligament insufficiency or failed previous surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8178594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81785942021-06-15 Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin Noh, Young Min Kong, Gyu Min Moon, Sang Won Jang, Hyo Seok Kim, Seungchul Bak, Gyeong Gu Kim, Youngbok JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Based on the controversy over whether the extensor tendon is the only lesion of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow and numerous reports of concomitant lateral collateral ligament involvement, potential damage to the lateral collateral ligament complex should be considered for the treatment. METHODS: About 25 elbows in 23 patients (débridement group) and 22 elbows in 20 patients (reconstruction group) who were diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and had an average of 22 months of symptoms revealing anatomical lesion on MRI were included. The capitellum-sublime tubercle-radial head (CSR) angle was measured on both sides preoperatively, and the visual analog scale (VAS) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were measured over 12 months, postoperatively. RESULTS: The initial preoperative mean VAS was statistically significant with 4.6 in the débridement group and 6.5 in the reconstruction group (P < .05). Postoperative VAS was continuously decreased in both groups with no significant difference at each assessment period (P < .05) but showed more rapid improvement in the reconstruction group compared with the débridement group. For MEPS, the reconstruction group showed significant improvement during the follow-up periods, and at the final follow-up MEPS, 3 cases in the débridement group and 0 cases in the reconstruction group showed a poor result, which was considered as surgery failure. The CSR angle of the affected side (7.2 ± 1.9) was significantly larger than that of the normal side (3.6 ± 1.5) (P < .05) in the reconstruction group. Increased CSR by more than 5 degrees was identified as a significant predictive indicator for potential concomitant ligament insufficiency (area under curve = 0.875, P < .001) showing 80.9% of the sensitivity, 82.1% of the specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis, lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction added to the débridement of extensor origin may provide better results for the patients with suspicious lateral ligament insufficiency or failed previous surgery. Elsevier 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8178594/ /pubmed/34136874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.006 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Noh, Young Min
Kong, Gyu Min
Moon, Sang Won
Jang, Hyo Seok
Kim, Seungchul
Bak, Gyeong Gu
Kim, Youngbok
Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
title Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
title_full Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
title_fullStr Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
title_full_unstemmed Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
title_short Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
title_sort lateral ulnar collateral ligament (lucl) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.006
work_keys_str_mv AT nohyoungmin lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin
AT konggyumin lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin
AT moonsangwon lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin
AT janghyoseok lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin
AT kimseungchul lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin
AT bakgyeonggu lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin
AT kimyoungbok lateralulnarcollateralligamentluclreconstructionforthetreatmentofrecalcitrantlateralepicondylitisoftheelbowacomparisonwithopendebridementoftheextensororigin