Cargando…

Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries

BACKGROUND: High coverage of care is essential to improving newborn survival; however, gaps exist in access to timely and appropriate newborn care between and within countries. In high mortality burden settings, health inequities due to social and economic factors may also impact on newborn outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peven, Kimberly, Mallick, Lindsay, Taylor, Cath, Bick, Debra, Day, Louise T., Kadzem, Lionel, Purssell, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z
_version_ 1783703666305269760
author Peven, Kimberly
Mallick, Lindsay
Taylor, Cath
Bick, Debra
Day, Louise T.
Kadzem, Lionel
Purssell, Edward
author_facet Peven, Kimberly
Mallick, Lindsay
Taylor, Cath
Bick, Debra
Day, Louise T.
Kadzem, Lionel
Purssell, Edward
author_sort Peven, Kimberly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High coverage of care is essential to improving newborn survival; however, gaps exist in access to timely and appropriate newborn care between and within countries. In high mortality burden settings, health inequities due to social and economic factors may also impact on newborn outcomes. This study aimed to examine equity in co-coverage of newborn care interventions in low- and low middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. METHODS: We analysed secondary data from recent Demographic and Health Surveys in 16 countries. We created a co-coverage index of five newborn care interventions. We examined differences in coverage and co-coverage of newborn care interventions by country, place of birth, and wealth quintile. Using multilevel logistic regression, we examined the association between high co-coverage of newborn care (4 or 5 interventions) and social determinants of health. RESULTS: Coverage and co-coverage of newborn care showed large between- and within-country gaps for home and facility births, with important inequities based on individual, family, contextual, and structural factors. Wealth-based inequities were smaller amongst facility births compared to non-facility births. CONCLUSION: This analysis underlines the importance of facility birth for improved and more equitable newborn care. Shifting births to facilities, improving facility-based care, and community-based or pro-poor interventions are important to mitigate wealth-based inequities in newborn care, particularly in countries with large differences between the poorest and richest families and in countries with very low coverage of care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8178885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81788852021-06-07 Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries Peven, Kimberly Mallick, Lindsay Taylor, Cath Bick, Debra Day, Louise T. Kadzem, Lionel Purssell, Edward Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: High coverage of care is essential to improving newborn survival; however, gaps exist in access to timely and appropriate newborn care between and within countries. In high mortality burden settings, health inequities due to social and economic factors may also impact on newborn outcomes. This study aimed to examine equity in co-coverage of newborn care interventions in low- and low middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. METHODS: We analysed secondary data from recent Demographic and Health Surveys in 16 countries. We created a co-coverage index of five newborn care interventions. We examined differences in coverage and co-coverage of newborn care interventions by country, place of birth, and wealth quintile. Using multilevel logistic regression, we examined the association between high co-coverage of newborn care (4 or 5 interventions) and social determinants of health. RESULTS: Coverage and co-coverage of newborn care showed large between- and within-country gaps for home and facility births, with important inequities based on individual, family, contextual, and structural factors. Wealth-based inequities were smaller amongst facility births compared to non-facility births. CONCLUSION: This analysis underlines the importance of facility birth for improved and more equitable newborn care. Shifting births to facilities, improving facility-based care, and community-based or pro-poor interventions are important to mitigate wealth-based inequities in newborn care, particularly in countries with large differences between the poorest and richest families and in countries with very low coverage of care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z. BioMed Central 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8178885/ /pubmed/34090427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Peven, Kimberly
Mallick, Lindsay
Taylor, Cath
Bick, Debra
Day, Louise T.
Kadzem, Lionel
Purssell, Edward
Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
title Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
title_full Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
title_fullStr Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
title_short Equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
title_sort equity in newborn care, evidence from national surveys in low- and middle-income countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01452-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pevenkimberly equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT mallicklindsay equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT taylorcath equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT bickdebra equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT daylouiset equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT kadzemlionel equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT pursselledward equityinnewborncareevidencefromnationalsurveysinlowandmiddleincomecountries