Cargando…
A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
OBJECTIVES: With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0 |
_version_ | 1783703669583118336 |
---|---|
author | MacKinnon, Ralph James Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Kennedy, Christopher Hollnagel, Erik Slater, David |
author_facet | MacKinnon, Ralph James Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Kennedy, Christopher Hollnagel, Erik Slater, David |
author_sort | MacKinnon, Ralph James |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key to maintaining safety. The aim of this paper is to describe an approach to explore the consequences of human variability from a Safety-II perspective and describe the added value of this to TES. METHODS: The reader is guided through a novel application of functional resonance analysis methodology (FRAM), a method to analyse how a system or activity is affected by human variability, to explore human adaptations observed in in situ simulations (ISS). The structured applicability of this novel approach to TES is described by application to empirical data from the standardised ISS management of paediatric time critical head injuries (TCHI). RESULTS: A case series is presented to illustrate the step-wise observation of key timings during ISSs, the construction of FRAM models and the visualisation of the propagation of human adaptations through the FRAM models. The key functions/actions that ensure the propagation are visible, as are the sequelae of the adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: The approach as described in this paper is a first step to illuminating how to explore, analyse and observe the consequences of positive and negative human adaptations within simulated complex systems. This provides TES with a structured methodology to visualise and reflect upon both Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8178899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81788992021-06-07 A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology MacKinnon, Ralph James Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Kennedy, Christopher Hollnagel, Erik Slater, David Adv Simul (Lond) Research OBJECTIVES: With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key to maintaining safety. The aim of this paper is to describe an approach to explore the consequences of human variability from a Safety-II perspective and describe the added value of this to TES. METHODS: The reader is guided through a novel application of functional resonance analysis methodology (FRAM), a method to analyse how a system or activity is affected by human variability, to explore human adaptations observed in in situ simulations (ISS). The structured applicability of this novel approach to TES is described by application to empirical data from the standardised ISS management of paediatric time critical head injuries (TCHI). RESULTS: A case series is presented to illustrate the step-wise observation of key timings during ISSs, the construction of FRAM models and the visualisation of the propagation of human adaptations through the FRAM models. The key functions/actions that ensure the propagation are visible, as are the sequelae of the adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: The approach as described in this paper is a first step to illuminating how to explore, analyse and observe the consequences of positive and negative human adaptations within simulated complex systems. This provides TES with a structured methodology to visualise and reflect upon both Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8178899/ /pubmed/34090533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research MacKinnon, Ralph James Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Kennedy, Christopher Hollnagel, Erik Slater, David A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
title | A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
title_full | A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
title_fullStr | A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
title_short | A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
title_sort | novel approach to explore safety-i and safety-ii perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackinnonralphjames anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT pukkharenstamkarin anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT kennedychristopher anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT hollnagelerik anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT slaterdavid anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT mackinnonralphjames novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT pukkharenstamkarin novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT kennedychristopher novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT hollnagelerik novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology AT slaterdavid novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology |