Cargando…

A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology

OBJECTIVES: With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacKinnon, Ralph James, Pukk-Härenstam, Karin, Kennedy, Christopher, Hollnagel, Erik, Slater, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0
_version_ 1783703669583118336
author MacKinnon, Ralph James
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Kennedy, Christopher
Hollnagel, Erik
Slater, David
author_facet MacKinnon, Ralph James
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Kennedy, Christopher
Hollnagel, Erik
Slater, David
author_sort MacKinnon, Ralph James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key to maintaining safety. The aim of this paper is to describe an approach to explore the consequences of human variability from a Safety-II perspective and describe the added value of this to TES. METHODS: The reader is guided through a novel application of functional resonance analysis methodology (FRAM), a method to analyse how a system or activity is affected by human variability, to explore human adaptations observed in in situ simulations (ISS). The structured applicability of this novel approach to TES is described by application to empirical data from the standardised ISS management of paediatric time critical head injuries (TCHI). RESULTS: A case series is presented to illustrate the step-wise observation of key timings during ISSs, the construction of FRAM models and the visualisation of the propagation of human adaptations through the FRAM models. The key functions/actions that ensure the propagation are visible, as are the sequelae of the adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: The approach as described in this paper is a first step to illuminating how to explore, analyse and observe the consequences of positive and negative human adaptations within simulated complex systems. This provides TES with a structured methodology to visualise and reflect upon both Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8178899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81788992021-06-07 A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology MacKinnon, Ralph James Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Kennedy, Christopher Hollnagel, Erik Slater, David Adv Simul (Lond) Research OBJECTIVES: With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key to maintaining safety. The aim of this paper is to describe an approach to explore the consequences of human variability from a Safety-II perspective and describe the added value of this to TES. METHODS: The reader is guided through a novel application of functional resonance analysis methodology (FRAM), a method to analyse how a system or activity is affected by human variability, to explore human adaptations observed in in situ simulations (ISS). The structured applicability of this novel approach to TES is described by application to empirical data from the standardised ISS management of paediatric time critical head injuries (TCHI). RESULTS: A case series is presented to illustrate the step-wise observation of key timings during ISSs, the construction of FRAM models and the visualisation of the propagation of human adaptations through the FRAM models. The key functions/actions that ensure the propagation are visible, as are the sequelae of the adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: The approach as described in this paper is a first step to illuminating how to explore, analyse and observe the consequences of positive and negative human adaptations within simulated complex systems. This provides TES with a structured methodology to visualise and reflect upon both Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8178899/ /pubmed/34090533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
MacKinnon, Ralph James
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Kennedy, Christopher
Hollnagel, Erik
Slater, David
A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
title A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
title_full A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
title_fullStr A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
title_full_unstemmed A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
title_short A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
title_sort novel approach to explore safety-i and safety-ii perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8178899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00166-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mackinnonralphjames anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT pukkharenstamkarin anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT kennedychristopher anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT hollnagelerik anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT slaterdavid anovelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT mackinnonralphjames novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT pukkharenstamkarin novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT kennedychristopher novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT hollnagelerik novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology
AT slaterdavid novelapproachtoexploresafetyiandsafetyiiperspectivesininsitusimulationsthestructuredwhatiffunctionalresonanceanalysismethodology