Cargando…

An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common, neurodegenerative disorder. It is a chronic, disabling, and progressive disease, and no treatment stops its progression. Rating scales are utilized to quantify PD progression and severity. The most conventional scale is the Unified Parkinson&#...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendricks, Renee M., Khasawneh, Mohammad T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8179766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1765220
_version_ 1783703857157636096
author Hendricks, Renee M.
Khasawneh, Mohammad T.
author_facet Hendricks, Renee M.
Khasawneh, Mohammad T.
author_sort Hendricks, Renee M.
collection PubMed
description Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common, neurodegenerative disorder. It is a chronic, disabling, and progressive disease, and no treatment stops its progression. Rating scales are utilized to quantify PD progression and severity. The most conventional scale is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and its modified version, Movement Disorder Society- (MDS-) UPDRS. An analytical investigation into the use and meaning of these clinical scale scores was conducted to determine if gaps exist in quantifying disease progression and severity. A series of discrepancies were identified including confusion among patients regarding the score meaning and misuse of the scores among clinicians and researchers to define disease progression. The scales are of an ordinal type and hence the resulting scores are ordinal, not providing a quantifiable progression nor severity level, but a categorical value and survey total. The knowledge that the scores are ordinal and the scales are subjective is mentioned in very limited publications, not the focus of these papers, but a brief introduction and a thoroughly researched, analytical investigation into the scales and scores have not been found. Therefore, the continuous misunderstanding and misuse of these scales and resulting scores warrant a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of these scales and scores to identify the gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8179766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81797662021-06-15 An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores Hendricks, Renee M. Khasawneh, Mohammad T. Parkinsons Dis Research Article Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common, neurodegenerative disorder. It is a chronic, disabling, and progressive disease, and no treatment stops its progression. Rating scales are utilized to quantify PD progression and severity. The most conventional scale is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and its modified version, Movement Disorder Society- (MDS-) UPDRS. An analytical investigation into the use and meaning of these clinical scale scores was conducted to determine if gaps exist in quantifying disease progression and severity. A series of discrepancies were identified including confusion among patients regarding the score meaning and misuse of the scores among clinicians and researchers to define disease progression. The scales are of an ordinal type and hence the resulting scores are ordinal, not providing a quantifiable progression nor severity level, but a categorical value and survey total. The knowledge that the scores are ordinal and the scales are subjective is mentioned in very limited publications, not the focus of these papers, but a brief introduction and a thoroughly researched, analytical investigation into the scales and scores have not been found. Therefore, the continuous misunderstanding and misuse of these scales and resulting scores warrant a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of these scales and scores to identify the gaps. Hindawi 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8179766/ /pubmed/34136119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1765220 Text en Copyright © 2021 Renee M. Hendricks and Mohammad T. Khasawneh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hendricks, Renee M.
Khasawneh, Mohammad T.
An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores
title An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores
title_full An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores
title_fullStr An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores
title_short An Investigation into the Use and Meaning of Parkinson's Disease Clinical Scale Scores
title_sort investigation into the use and meaning of parkinson's disease clinical scale scores
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8179766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1765220
work_keys_str_mv AT hendricksreneem aninvestigationintotheuseandmeaningofparkinsonsdiseaseclinicalscalescores
AT khasawnehmohammadt aninvestigationintotheuseandmeaningofparkinsonsdiseaseclinicalscalescores
AT hendricksreneem investigationintotheuseandmeaningofparkinsonsdiseaseclinicalscalescores
AT khasawnehmohammadt investigationintotheuseandmeaningofparkinsonsdiseaseclinicalscalescores