Cargando…

“Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the progno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Bo, Li, Dan, Liu, Jing-Feng, Wang, Lin, Li, Bao-Zhu, Yan, Xiu-Juan, Liu, Wei, Wu, Kun, Xiang, Ruo-Lan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8179908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09596-3
_version_ 1783703887869378560
author Li, Bo
Li, Dan
Liu, Jing-Feng
Wang, Lin
Li, Bao-Zhu
Yan, Xiu-Juan
Liu, Wei
Wu, Kun
Xiang, Ruo-Lan
author_facet Li, Bo
Li, Dan
Liu, Jing-Feng
Wang, Lin
Li, Bao-Zhu
Yan, Xiu-Juan
Liu, Wei
Wu, Kun
Xiang, Ruo-Lan
author_sort Li, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the prognosis of IS. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science for papers, published before January 2019. In this meta-analysis, Review Manager 5.3 software was used to calculate for the pooled estimate effect, as well as the inverse-variance method for pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) of incidence in two groups of population. RESULTS: A total of 14,789 citations were identified during the literature search, 21 studies were included in the meta-analyses after screening. The full-adjusted OR of poor prognostic outcome in smoking and nonsmoking patients with stroke was pooled as 0.96 (95% CI 0.77–1.21), suggested that smoking or not has no impact on prognosis of IS. The pooled MD of onset age between smoking and nonsmoking IS patients was − 10.05 (− 12.91, − 7.19), indicated that smoking causes first onset of IS to occur 10 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that smoking was not a protective factor for poor prognosis of IS. Smoking patients with IS are 10 years younger than nonsmoking patients at time of the first onset of stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8179908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81799082021-06-17 “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Bo Li, Dan Liu, Jing-Feng Wang, Lin Li, Bao-Zhu Yan, Xiu-Juan Liu, Wei Wu, Kun Xiang, Ruo-Lan J Neurol Review BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the prognosis of IS. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science for papers, published before January 2019. In this meta-analysis, Review Manager 5.3 software was used to calculate for the pooled estimate effect, as well as the inverse-variance method for pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) of incidence in two groups of population. RESULTS: A total of 14,789 citations were identified during the literature search, 21 studies were included in the meta-analyses after screening. The full-adjusted OR of poor prognostic outcome in smoking and nonsmoking patients with stroke was pooled as 0.96 (95% CI 0.77–1.21), suggested that smoking or not has no impact on prognosis of IS. The pooled MD of onset age between smoking and nonsmoking IS patients was − 10.05 (− 12.91, − 7.19), indicated that smoking causes first onset of IS to occur 10 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that smoking was not a protective factor for poor prognosis of IS. Smoking patients with IS are 10 years younger than nonsmoking patients at time of the first onset of stroke. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8179908/ /pubmed/31664548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09596-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Li, Bo
Li, Dan
Liu, Jing-Feng
Wang, Lin
Li, Bao-Zhu
Yan, Xiu-Juan
Liu, Wei
Wu, Kun
Xiang, Ruo-Lan
“Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort “smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8179908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09596-3
work_keys_str_mv AT libo smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lidan smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujingfeng smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanglin smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT libaozhu smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanxiujuan smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuwei smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wukun smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiangruolan smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis