Cargando…
“Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the progno...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8179908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09596-3 |
_version_ | 1783703887869378560 |
---|---|
author | Li, Bo Li, Dan Liu, Jing-Feng Wang, Lin Li, Bao-Zhu Yan, Xiu-Juan Liu, Wei Wu, Kun Xiang, Ruo-Lan |
author_facet | Li, Bo Li, Dan Liu, Jing-Feng Wang, Lin Li, Bao-Zhu Yan, Xiu-Juan Liu, Wei Wu, Kun Xiang, Ruo-Lan |
author_sort | Li, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the prognosis of IS. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science for papers, published before January 2019. In this meta-analysis, Review Manager 5.3 software was used to calculate for the pooled estimate effect, as well as the inverse-variance method for pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) of incidence in two groups of population. RESULTS: A total of 14,789 citations were identified during the literature search, 21 studies were included in the meta-analyses after screening. The full-adjusted OR of poor prognostic outcome in smoking and nonsmoking patients with stroke was pooled as 0.96 (95% CI 0.77–1.21), suggested that smoking or not has no impact on prognosis of IS. The pooled MD of onset age between smoking and nonsmoking IS patients was − 10.05 (− 12.91, − 7.19), indicated that smoking causes first onset of IS to occur 10 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that smoking was not a protective factor for poor prognosis of IS. Smoking patients with IS are 10 years younger than nonsmoking patients at time of the first onset of stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8179908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81799082021-06-17 “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Bo Li, Dan Liu, Jing-Feng Wang, Lin Li, Bao-Zhu Yan, Xiu-Juan Liu, Wei Wu, Kun Xiang, Ruo-Lan J Neurol Review BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the prognosis of IS. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science for papers, published before January 2019. In this meta-analysis, Review Manager 5.3 software was used to calculate for the pooled estimate effect, as well as the inverse-variance method for pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) of incidence in two groups of population. RESULTS: A total of 14,789 citations were identified during the literature search, 21 studies were included in the meta-analyses after screening. The full-adjusted OR of poor prognostic outcome in smoking and nonsmoking patients with stroke was pooled as 0.96 (95% CI 0.77–1.21), suggested that smoking or not has no impact on prognosis of IS. The pooled MD of onset age between smoking and nonsmoking IS patients was − 10.05 (− 12.91, − 7.19), indicated that smoking causes first onset of IS to occur 10 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that smoking was not a protective factor for poor prognosis of IS. Smoking patients with IS are 10 years younger than nonsmoking patients at time of the first onset of stroke. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8179908/ /pubmed/31664548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09596-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Li, Bo Li, Dan Liu, Jing-Feng Wang, Lin Li, Bao-Zhu Yan, Xiu-Juan Liu, Wei Wu, Kun Xiang, Ruo-Lan “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | “Smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | “smoking paradox” is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8179908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09596-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT libo smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lidan smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liujingfeng smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanglin smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT libaozhu smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanxiujuan smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuwei smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wukun smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiangruolan smokingparadoxisnottrueinpatientswithischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |