Cargando…

Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently emerged as a viable management option for peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). CRS and HIPEC is a complex, multidisciplinary and resource-intensive surgical procedure. It has a steep learning c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deo, Suryanarayana, Ray, Mukurdipi, Bansal, Babul, Bhoriwal, Sandeep, Bhatnagar, Sushma, Garg, Rakesh, Gupta, Nishkarsh, Sharma, Atul, Kumar, Lalit, Thulkar, Sanjay, Dhamija, Ekta, Mathur, Sandeep, Das, Prasenjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8180169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02276-5
_version_ 1783703944703246336
author Deo, Suryanarayana
Ray, Mukurdipi
Bansal, Babul
Bhoriwal, Sandeep
Bhatnagar, Sushma
Garg, Rakesh
Gupta, Nishkarsh
Sharma, Atul
Kumar, Lalit
Thulkar, Sanjay
Dhamija, Ekta
Mathur, Sandeep
Das, Prasenjit
author_facet Deo, Suryanarayana
Ray, Mukurdipi
Bansal, Babul
Bhoriwal, Sandeep
Bhatnagar, Sushma
Garg, Rakesh
Gupta, Nishkarsh
Sharma, Atul
Kumar, Lalit
Thulkar, Sanjay
Dhamija, Ekta
Mathur, Sandeep
Das, Prasenjit
author_sort Deo, Suryanarayana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently emerged as a viable management option for peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). CRS and HIPEC is a complex, multidisciplinary and resource-intensive surgical procedure. It has a steep learning curve and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The expertise is mostly limited to few dedicated high-volume centers located in developed countries. We present a single institutional experience of 232 cases of CRS and HIPEC performed at a tertiary care cancer center in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). METHODS: A multidisciplinary PSM program was initiated in 2015 at a high-volume public-sector tertiary care cancer center in North India catering largely to patients belonging to low- and middle-income groups. Perioperative protocols were developed, and a prospective structured database was created to capture data. All patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC between January 2015 and December 2020 were identified, and the data was retrospectively analyzed for clinical spectrum, surgical details, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-two patients underwent CRS and HIPEC during the study period. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (56.5%) was the most common malignancy treated, followed by pseudomyxoma peritonei (18.5%), colorectal carcinoma (13.4%), and malignant mesothelioma (5.6%). Optimal CRS could be achieved in 94.4% of patients. Cisplatin and mitomycin were the most common drugs used for HIPEC. A total of 28.0% of patients had morbidity including deep vein thrombosis, subacute intestinal obstruction, sepsis, burst abdomen, lymphocele, urinoma, acute renal failure, and enterocutaneous fistula. The overall treatment-related mortality was 3.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current study indicate that it is feasible to establish a successful CRS and HIPEC program for PSM in government-funded hospitals in LMIC facing resource constraints. The most common indication for CRS and HIPEC were carcinoma of the ovary followed by pseudomyxoma peritonei and colorectal carcinoma. Overall morbidity and mortality in the current series are comparable to global standards, reported from high-income countries. A protocol-based multidisciplinary team approach, optimal patient selection, and surgical expertise can help achieve optimal outcomes in government-funded hospitals in LMIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8180169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81801692021-06-07 Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases Deo, Suryanarayana Ray, Mukurdipi Bansal, Babul Bhoriwal, Sandeep Bhatnagar, Sushma Garg, Rakesh Gupta, Nishkarsh Sharma, Atul Kumar, Lalit Thulkar, Sanjay Dhamija, Ekta Mathur, Sandeep Das, Prasenjit World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently emerged as a viable management option for peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). CRS and HIPEC is a complex, multidisciplinary and resource-intensive surgical procedure. It has a steep learning curve and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The expertise is mostly limited to few dedicated high-volume centers located in developed countries. We present a single institutional experience of 232 cases of CRS and HIPEC performed at a tertiary care cancer center in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). METHODS: A multidisciplinary PSM program was initiated in 2015 at a high-volume public-sector tertiary care cancer center in North India catering largely to patients belonging to low- and middle-income groups. Perioperative protocols were developed, and a prospective structured database was created to capture data. All patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC between January 2015 and December 2020 were identified, and the data was retrospectively analyzed for clinical spectrum, surgical details, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-two patients underwent CRS and HIPEC during the study period. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (56.5%) was the most common malignancy treated, followed by pseudomyxoma peritonei (18.5%), colorectal carcinoma (13.4%), and malignant mesothelioma (5.6%). Optimal CRS could be achieved in 94.4% of patients. Cisplatin and mitomycin were the most common drugs used for HIPEC. A total of 28.0% of patients had morbidity including deep vein thrombosis, subacute intestinal obstruction, sepsis, burst abdomen, lymphocele, urinoma, acute renal failure, and enterocutaneous fistula. The overall treatment-related mortality was 3.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current study indicate that it is feasible to establish a successful CRS and HIPEC program for PSM in government-funded hospitals in LMIC facing resource constraints. The most common indication for CRS and HIPEC were carcinoma of the ovary followed by pseudomyxoma peritonei and colorectal carcinoma. Overall morbidity and mortality in the current series are comparable to global standards, reported from high-income countries. A protocol-based multidisciplinary team approach, optimal patient selection, and surgical expertise can help achieve optimal outcomes in government-funded hospitals in LMIC. BioMed Central 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8180169/ /pubmed/34090452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02276-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Deo, Suryanarayana
Ray, Mukurdipi
Bansal, Babul
Bhoriwal, Sandeep
Bhatnagar, Sushma
Garg, Rakesh
Gupta, Nishkarsh
Sharma, Atul
Kumar, Lalit
Thulkar, Sanjay
Dhamija, Ekta
Mathur, Sandeep
Das, Prasenjit
Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
title Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
title_full Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
title_fullStr Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
title_short Feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
title_sort feasibility and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hipec for peritoneal surface malignancies in low- and middle-income countries: a single-center experience of 232 cases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8180169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02276-5
work_keys_str_mv AT deosuryanarayana feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT raymukurdipi feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT bansalbabul feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT bhoriwalsandeep feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT bhatnagarsushma feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT gargrakesh feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT guptanishkarsh feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT sharmaatul feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT kumarlalit feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT thulkarsanjay feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT dhamijaekta feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT mathursandeep feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases
AT dasprasenjit feasibilityandoutcomesofcytoreductivesurgeryandhipecforperitonealsurfacemalignanciesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterexperienceof232cases