Cargando…

Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device

INTRODUCTION: Several treatment options exist for those with spinal stenosis, as well as degenerative changes. This series evaluates the use of an interspinous fixation (ISF) device as performed by interventional pain physicians. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis identifying 32 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falowski, Steven M, Mangal, Vipul, Pope, Jason, Patel, Anish, Coleman, Mark, Kendall, Dan, Brouillette, Richard, Fishman, Michael A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8180294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103977
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S304957
_version_ 1783703971381116928
author Falowski, Steven M
Mangal, Vipul
Pope, Jason
Patel, Anish
Coleman, Mark
Kendall, Dan
Brouillette, Richard
Fishman, Michael A
author_facet Falowski, Steven M
Mangal, Vipul
Pope, Jason
Patel, Anish
Coleman, Mark
Kendall, Dan
Brouillette, Richard
Fishman, Michael A
author_sort Falowski, Steven M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several treatment options exist for those with spinal stenosis, as well as degenerative changes. This series evaluates the use of an interspinous fixation (ISF) device as performed by interventional pain physicians. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis identifying 32 patients with the diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disc disease with secondary diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis being treated with ISF with Aurora Spine Zip Interspinous Spacer. Serious adverse events, specifically nerve injury, hematoma, infection, and death, were analyzed quantitatively for reported complications within 90 days from the procedure. In addition, VAS was analyzed for patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Adverse event rate was 0% with no incidences of reoperation, or device removal. Estimated blood loss was recorded as less than 50 cc for all patients. The preoperative pain assessment demonstrated an average pain score of 8.1 and a postoperative pain score of 2.65 equating to a percentage pain reduction of 67%. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrates the success and safety of ISF being performed by interventional pain physicians in an outpatient setting. It is a valuable tool in the treatment of moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease that has decreased morbidity and significant efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8180294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81802942021-06-07 Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device Falowski, Steven M Mangal, Vipul Pope, Jason Patel, Anish Coleman, Mark Kendall, Dan Brouillette, Richard Fishman, Michael A J Pain Res Original Research INTRODUCTION: Several treatment options exist for those with spinal stenosis, as well as degenerative changes. This series evaluates the use of an interspinous fixation (ISF) device as performed by interventional pain physicians. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis identifying 32 patients with the diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disc disease with secondary diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis being treated with ISF with Aurora Spine Zip Interspinous Spacer. Serious adverse events, specifically nerve injury, hematoma, infection, and death, were analyzed quantitatively for reported complications within 90 days from the procedure. In addition, VAS was analyzed for patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Adverse event rate was 0% with no incidences of reoperation, or device removal. Estimated blood loss was recorded as less than 50 cc for all patients. The preoperative pain assessment demonstrated an average pain score of 8.1 and a postoperative pain score of 2.65 equating to a percentage pain reduction of 67%. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrates the success and safety of ISF being performed by interventional pain physicians in an outpatient setting. It is a valuable tool in the treatment of moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease that has decreased morbidity and significant efficacy. Dove 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8180294/ /pubmed/34103977 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S304957 Text en © 2021 Falowski et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Falowski, Steven M
Mangal, Vipul
Pope, Jason
Patel, Anish
Coleman, Mark
Kendall, Dan
Brouillette, Richard
Fishman, Michael A
Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
title Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
title_full Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
title_fullStr Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
title_short Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
title_sort multicenter retrospective review of safety and efficacy of a novel minimally invasive lumbar interspinous fusion device
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8180294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103977
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S304957
work_keys_str_mv AT falowskistevenm multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT mangalvipul multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT popejason multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT patelanish multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT colemanmark multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT kendalldan multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT brouilletterichard multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice
AT fishmanmichaela multicenterretrospectivereviewofsafetyandefficacyofanovelminimallyinvasivelumbarinterspinousfusiondevice