Cargando…

Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors

PURPOSE: To assess T2*-weighted imaging (T2*WI) and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted Imaging (rDWI) derived parameters and their relationships with histopathological factors in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with pathologically-proven rectal cancer underwent preope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Yang, Luo, Yan, Hu, Xuemei, Shen, Yaqi, Hu, Daoyu, Li, Zhen, Kamel, Ihab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8180870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.670156
_version_ 1783704042130636800
author Peng, Yang
Luo, Yan
Hu, Xuemei
Shen, Yaqi
Hu, Daoyu
Li, Zhen
Kamel, Ihab
author_facet Peng, Yang
Luo, Yan
Hu, Xuemei
Shen, Yaqi
Hu, Daoyu
Li, Zhen
Kamel, Ihab
author_sort Peng, Yang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess T2*-weighted imaging (T2*WI) and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted Imaging (rDWI) derived parameters and their relationships with histopathological factors in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with pathologically-proven rectal cancer underwent preoperative T2*-weighted imaging and rDWI in this retrospective study. R2* values from T2*-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from rDWI were compared in terms of different histopathological prognostic factors using student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlations of R2* and ADC with prognostic factors were assessed by Spearman correlation analysis. The diagnostic performances of R2* and ADC were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) separately and jointly. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation was found between R2* values and T stage, lymph node involvement, histological grades, CEA level, the presence of EMVI and tumor deposit (r = 0.374 ~ 0.673, p = 0.000–0.006), with the exception of CA19-9 level, CRM status and tumor involvement in the circumference lumen (TIL). Meanwhile, ADC values negatively correlated with almost all the prognostic factors (r = −0.588 to −0.299, p = 0.000–0.030), except CA19-9 level. The AUC range was 0.724–0.907 for R2* and 0.674–0.887 for ADC in discrimination of different prognostic factors. While showing the highest AUC of 0.913 (0.803–1.000) in differentiation of T stage, combination of R2* and ADC with reference to different prognostic factors did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance in comparison with individual R2*/ADC parameter. CONCLUSIONS: R2* and ADC were associated with important histopathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer. R2* might act as additional quantitative imaging marker for tumor characterization of rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8180870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81808702021-06-08 Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors Peng, Yang Luo, Yan Hu, Xuemei Shen, Yaqi Hu, Daoyu Li, Zhen Kamel, Ihab Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: To assess T2*-weighted imaging (T2*WI) and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted Imaging (rDWI) derived parameters and their relationships with histopathological factors in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with pathologically-proven rectal cancer underwent preoperative T2*-weighted imaging and rDWI in this retrospective study. R2* values from T2*-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from rDWI were compared in terms of different histopathological prognostic factors using student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlations of R2* and ADC with prognostic factors were assessed by Spearman correlation analysis. The diagnostic performances of R2* and ADC were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) separately and jointly. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation was found between R2* values and T stage, lymph node involvement, histological grades, CEA level, the presence of EMVI and tumor deposit (r = 0.374 ~ 0.673, p = 0.000–0.006), with the exception of CA19-9 level, CRM status and tumor involvement in the circumference lumen (TIL). Meanwhile, ADC values negatively correlated with almost all the prognostic factors (r = −0.588 to −0.299, p = 0.000–0.030), except CA19-9 level. The AUC range was 0.724–0.907 for R2* and 0.674–0.887 for ADC in discrimination of different prognostic factors. While showing the highest AUC of 0.913 (0.803–1.000) in differentiation of T stage, combination of R2* and ADC with reference to different prognostic factors did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance in comparison with individual R2*/ADC parameter. CONCLUSIONS: R2* and ADC were associated with important histopathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer. R2* might act as additional quantitative imaging marker for tumor characterization of rectal cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8180870/ /pubmed/34109120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.670156 Text en Copyright © 2021 Peng, Luo, Hu, Shen, Hu, Li and Kamel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Peng, Yang
Luo, Yan
Hu, Xuemei
Shen, Yaqi
Hu, Daoyu
Li, Zhen
Kamel, Ihab
Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors
title Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors
title_full Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors
title_fullStr Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors
title_short Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors
title_sort quantitative t2*-weighted imaging and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of rectal cancer: correlation of r2* and apparent diffusion coefficient with histopathological prognostic factors
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8180870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.670156
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyang quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors
AT luoyan quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors
AT huxuemei quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors
AT shenyaqi quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors
AT hudaoyu quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors
AT lizhen quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors
AT kamelihab quantitativet2weightedimagingandreducedfieldofviewdiffusionweightedimagingofrectalcancercorrelationofr2andapparentdiffusioncoefficientwithhistopathologicalprognosticfactors