Cargando…
Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
There have been speculations regarding rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) globally owing to indiscriminate antibiotic usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. To curb the menace through decisive policies, it is essential to assess the antibiotics, particularly the antibacterial agents. This systemati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8181540/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00194-6 |
_version_ | 1783704102094503936 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Swati Singh, Aradhana Banerjee, Tuhina |
author_facet | Sharma, Swati Singh, Aradhana Banerjee, Tuhina |
author_sort | Sharma, Swati |
collection | PubMed |
description | There have been speculations regarding rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) globally owing to indiscriminate antibiotic usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. To curb the menace through decisive policies, it is essential to assess the antibiotics, particularly the antibacterial agents. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients. A thorough systematic search was undertaken in databases like PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, World Health Organization (WHO) database and clinicaltrials.gov by two independent reviewers for articles in English published from January 1, 2019 to October 31, 2020. Studies were included if they assessed confirmed COVID-19 cases and mentioned the use of antibiotics. The primary outcome was the proportion of COVID-19 patients subjected to specific antibacterial agents. An attempt to stratify the data based on study settings and disease severity was also performed. Of the total 6012 studies screened, 40 were eligible for qualitative review and 19 for meta-analysis. Specific antibacterial agents were mentioned in 23 studies (57.5%). In the random effect meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of azithromycin use was 24.5% (95% CI 22.9–26.2%) followed by cephalosporins as 26.6% (95% CI 24.9–28.4). None of the studies clearly specified indications for antibiotic use. Ten studies (25%) mentioned empirical use of antibiotics. Bacterial co-infections/secondary infections were documented in four studies with mean prevalence of infection of 1.9% (95% CI 1.2–2.8%). There is lack of data on use of specific antibacterial agents, indications for their use based on severity of infections and microbiological evidence of bacterial co-infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8181540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81815402021-06-07 Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sharma, Swati Singh, Aradhana Banerjee, Tuhina Environmental Sustainability Review There have been speculations regarding rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) globally owing to indiscriminate antibiotic usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. To curb the menace through decisive policies, it is essential to assess the antibiotics, particularly the antibacterial agents. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients. A thorough systematic search was undertaken in databases like PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, World Health Organization (WHO) database and clinicaltrials.gov by two independent reviewers for articles in English published from January 1, 2019 to October 31, 2020. Studies were included if they assessed confirmed COVID-19 cases and mentioned the use of antibiotics. The primary outcome was the proportion of COVID-19 patients subjected to specific antibacterial agents. An attempt to stratify the data based on study settings and disease severity was also performed. Of the total 6012 studies screened, 40 were eligible for qualitative review and 19 for meta-analysis. Specific antibacterial agents were mentioned in 23 studies (57.5%). In the random effect meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of azithromycin use was 24.5% (95% CI 22.9–26.2%) followed by cephalosporins as 26.6% (95% CI 24.9–28.4). None of the studies clearly specified indications for antibiotic use. Ten studies (25%) mentioned empirical use of antibiotics. Bacterial co-infections/secondary infections were documented in four studies with mean prevalence of infection of 1.9% (95% CI 1.2–2.8%). There is lack of data on use of specific antibacterial agents, indications for their use based on severity of infections and microbiological evidence of bacterial co-infections. Springer Singapore 2021-06-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8181540/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00194-6 Text en © Society for Environmental Sustainability 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Sharma, Swati Singh, Aradhana Banerjee, Tuhina Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Antibacterial agents used in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | antibacterial agents used in covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8181540/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00194-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaswati antibacterialagentsusedincovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singharadhana antibacterialagentsusedincovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT banerjeetuhina antibacterialagentsusedincovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |