Cargando…

Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting

BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative tests in healthy patients not only cause extra anxiety, but may delay treatment without influencing surgical plan. This has worse impact in resource-constrained settings where fee for service rather than health insurance is the usual norm. Investigators aim to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan, Obada, Fahad, Shah, Mustafa, Mohammad, Hashmi, Pervaiz, Noordin, Shahryar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8181773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102439
_version_ 1783704123883913216
author Hasan, Obada
Fahad, Shah
Mustafa, Mohammad
Hashmi, Pervaiz
Noordin, Shahryar
author_facet Hasan, Obada
Fahad, Shah
Mustafa, Mohammad
Hashmi, Pervaiz
Noordin, Shahryar
author_sort Hasan, Obada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative tests in healthy patients not only cause extra anxiety, but may delay treatment without influencing surgical plan. This has worse impact in resource-constrained settings where fee for service rather than health insurance is the usual norm. Investigators aim to determine if “routine” pre-operative tests are justified in healthy orthopedic patients. METHODS: We conducted a non-commercialized, non-funded matched case control study in tertiary care university hospital and a level-1 trauma centre for healthy patients (ASA-1&2) admitted from January 2014–December 2016 for elective orthopedic intermediate and major procedures. Cases (patient who had a change in his/her surgical plan after admission) and controls were selected independently of the exposure of interest then matched randomly to cases on age, gender and procedure type. Primary exposure was the routine preoperative lab tests, as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologist, which included 13 blood tests. Analysis was done using Principle Component Analysis and Conditional logistic regression at univariate and multivariable levels reporting matched adjusted Odds Ratios. The data was reported in line with STROCSS criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 7610 preoperative tests were done for 670 patients with 62% men among cases and 53% men among controls with mean age of 49.9 [Formula: see text] 22.5 years and 41.1 [Formula: see text] 23.0 years, respectively. There were 1076 (14%) abnormal result that influenced surgical plan in 0.96% cases only. Matched adjusted OR with 95% confidence interval of primary exposure was insignificant. CONCLUSION: Routine preoperative tests were superfluous and did not influence the surgical plan when adjusted for other variables in the model as well as after matching on potential confounders. This study would be amongst first steps to move towards an evidence based surgical practice for preoperative evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8181773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81817732021-06-15 Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting Hasan, Obada Fahad, Shah Mustafa, Mohammad Hashmi, Pervaiz Noordin, Shahryar Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case-controlled Study BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative tests in healthy patients not only cause extra anxiety, but may delay treatment without influencing surgical plan. This has worse impact in resource-constrained settings where fee for service rather than health insurance is the usual norm. Investigators aim to determine if “routine” pre-operative tests are justified in healthy orthopedic patients. METHODS: We conducted a non-commercialized, non-funded matched case control study in tertiary care university hospital and a level-1 trauma centre for healthy patients (ASA-1&2) admitted from January 2014–December 2016 for elective orthopedic intermediate and major procedures. Cases (patient who had a change in his/her surgical plan after admission) and controls were selected independently of the exposure of interest then matched randomly to cases on age, gender and procedure type. Primary exposure was the routine preoperative lab tests, as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologist, which included 13 blood tests. Analysis was done using Principle Component Analysis and Conditional logistic regression at univariate and multivariable levels reporting matched adjusted Odds Ratios. The data was reported in line with STROCSS criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 7610 preoperative tests were done for 670 patients with 62% men among cases and 53% men among controls with mean age of 49.9 [Formula: see text] 22.5 years and 41.1 [Formula: see text] 23.0 years, respectively. There were 1076 (14%) abnormal result that influenced surgical plan in 0.96% cases only. Matched adjusted OR with 95% confidence interval of primary exposure was insignificant. CONCLUSION: Routine preoperative tests were superfluous and did not influence the surgical plan when adjusted for other variables in the model as well as after matching on potential confounders. This study would be amongst first steps to move towards an evidence based surgical practice for preoperative evaluation. Elsevier 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8181773/ /pubmed/34136212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102439 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case-controlled Study
Hasan, Obada
Fahad, Shah
Mustafa, Mohammad
Hashmi, Pervaiz
Noordin, Shahryar
Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting
title Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting
title_full Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting
title_fullStr Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting
title_full_unstemmed Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting
title_short Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting
title_sort does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? case control study from a resource-constrained setting
topic Case-controlled Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8181773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102439
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanobada doesmoretestinginroutinepreoperativeevaluationbenefittheorthopedicpatientcasecontrolstudyfromaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT fahadshah doesmoretestinginroutinepreoperativeevaluationbenefittheorthopedicpatientcasecontrolstudyfromaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT mustafamohammad doesmoretestinginroutinepreoperativeevaluationbenefittheorthopedicpatientcasecontrolstudyfromaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT hashmipervaiz doesmoretestinginroutinepreoperativeevaluationbenefittheorthopedicpatientcasecontrolstudyfromaresourceconstrainedsetting
AT noordinshahryar doesmoretestinginroutinepreoperativeevaluationbenefittheorthopedicpatientcasecontrolstudyfromaresourceconstrainedsetting