Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method

BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Launay, Marine, Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman, Green, Nicholas, Maharaj, Jashint, Cutbush, Kenneth, Pivonka, Peter, Gupta, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211011058
_version_ 1783704158897963008
author Launay, Marine
Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman
Green, Nicholas
Maharaj, Jashint
Cutbush, Kenneth
Pivonka, Peter
Gupta, Ashish
author_facet Launay, Marine
Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman
Green, Nicholas
Maharaj, Jashint
Cutbush, Kenneth
Pivonka, Peter
Gupta, Ashish
author_sort Launay, Marine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement during surgery. PURPOSE: To quantify the concave surface area of glenoid bone loss by using 3-dimensional (3D) segmented models of the scapula and to compare this method with the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods, which use the glenoid rim for bone loss estimations. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive preoperative bilateral computed tomography scans of patients eligible for a primary Latarjet procedure were selected from our institutional surgical database (mean patient age, 29 ± 9 years; 31 men and 5 women). The 3D models of both scapulae were generated using medical segmentation software and were used to map the anatomic concave surface area (ACSA) of the inferior glenoid using the diameter of the best-fit circle of the healthy glenoid. Bone loss was calculated as a ratio of the difference between surface areas of both glenoids (healthy and pathological) against the anatomic circular surface area of the healthy glenoid (the ACSA method). These results were compared with bone loss calculations using the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) bone loss calculated using the ACSA, the best-fit circle, and glenoid height/width methods was 9.4% ± 6.7%, 14.3% ± 6.8%, and 17.6% ± 7.3%, respectively. The ACSA method showed excellent interobserver reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 versus those for the best-fit circle (ICC, 0.71) and glenoid height/width (ICC, 0.79) methods. CONCLUSION: Quantification of instability-related glenoid bone loss is reliable using the 3D ACSA method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8182205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81822052021-06-21 Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method Launay, Marine Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman Green, Nicholas Maharaj, Jashint Cutbush, Kenneth Pivonka, Peter Gupta, Ashish Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement during surgery. PURPOSE: To quantify the concave surface area of glenoid bone loss by using 3-dimensional (3D) segmented models of the scapula and to compare this method with the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods, which use the glenoid rim for bone loss estimations. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive preoperative bilateral computed tomography scans of patients eligible for a primary Latarjet procedure were selected from our institutional surgical database (mean patient age, 29 ± 9 years; 31 men and 5 women). The 3D models of both scapulae were generated using medical segmentation software and were used to map the anatomic concave surface area (ACSA) of the inferior glenoid using the diameter of the best-fit circle of the healthy glenoid. Bone loss was calculated as a ratio of the difference between surface areas of both glenoids (healthy and pathological) against the anatomic circular surface area of the healthy glenoid (the ACSA method). These results were compared with bone loss calculations using the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) bone loss calculated using the ACSA, the best-fit circle, and glenoid height/width methods was 9.4% ± 6.7%, 14.3% ± 6.8%, and 17.6% ± 7.3%, respectively. The ACSA method showed excellent interobserver reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 versus those for the best-fit circle (ICC, 0.71) and glenoid height/width (ICC, 0.79) methods. CONCLUSION: Quantification of instability-related glenoid bone loss is reliable using the 3D ACSA method. SAGE Publications 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8182205/ /pubmed/34159213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211011058 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Launay, Marine
Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman
Green, Nicholas
Maharaj, Jashint
Cutbush, Kenneth
Pivonka, Peter
Gupta, Ashish
Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
title Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
title_full Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
title_short Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
title_sort three-dimensional quantification of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: the anatomic concave surface area method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211011058
work_keys_str_mv AT launaymarine threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod
AT choudhrymuhammadnaghman threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod
AT greennicholas threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod
AT maharajjashint threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod
AT cutbushkenneth threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod
AT pivonkapeter threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod
AT guptaashish threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod