Cargando…
Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method
BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211011058 |
_version_ | 1783704158897963008 |
---|---|
author | Launay, Marine Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman Green, Nicholas Maharaj, Jashint Cutbush, Kenneth Pivonka, Peter Gupta, Ashish |
author_facet | Launay, Marine Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman Green, Nicholas Maharaj, Jashint Cutbush, Kenneth Pivonka, Peter Gupta, Ashish |
author_sort | Launay, Marine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement during surgery. PURPOSE: To quantify the concave surface area of glenoid bone loss by using 3-dimensional (3D) segmented models of the scapula and to compare this method with the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods, which use the glenoid rim for bone loss estimations. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive preoperative bilateral computed tomography scans of patients eligible for a primary Latarjet procedure were selected from our institutional surgical database (mean patient age, 29 ± 9 years; 31 men and 5 women). The 3D models of both scapulae were generated using medical segmentation software and were used to map the anatomic concave surface area (ACSA) of the inferior glenoid using the diameter of the best-fit circle of the healthy glenoid. Bone loss was calculated as a ratio of the difference between surface areas of both glenoids (healthy and pathological) against the anatomic circular surface area of the healthy glenoid (the ACSA method). These results were compared with bone loss calculations using the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) bone loss calculated using the ACSA, the best-fit circle, and glenoid height/width methods was 9.4% ± 6.7%, 14.3% ± 6.8%, and 17.6% ± 7.3%, respectively. The ACSA method showed excellent interobserver reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 versus those for the best-fit circle (ICC, 0.71) and glenoid height/width (ICC, 0.79) methods. CONCLUSION: Quantification of instability-related glenoid bone loss is reliable using the 3D ACSA method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81822052021-06-21 Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method Launay, Marine Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman Green, Nicholas Maharaj, Jashint Cutbush, Kenneth Pivonka, Peter Gupta, Ashish Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Recurrent shoulder instability may be associated with glenoid erosion and bone loss. Accurate quantification of bone loss significantly influences the contemplation of surgical procedure. In addition, assessment of bone loss is crucial for surgical planning and accurate graft placement during surgery. PURPOSE: To quantify the concave surface area of glenoid bone loss by using 3-dimensional (3D) segmented models of the scapula and to compare this method with the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods, which use the glenoid rim for bone loss estimations. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive preoperative bilateral computed tomography scans of patients eligible for a primary Latarjet procedure were selected from our institutional surgical database (mean patient age, 29 ± 9 years; 31 men and 5 women). The 3D models of both scapulae were generated using medical segmentation software and were used to map the anatomic concave surface area (ACSA) of the inferior glenoid using the diameter of the best-fit circle of the healthy glenoid. Bone loss was calculated as a ratio of the difference between surface areas of both glenoids (healthy and pathological) against the anatomic circular surface area of the healthy glenoid (the ACSA method). These results were compared with bone loss calculations using the best-fit circle and glenoid height/width methods. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) bone loss calculated using the ACSA, the best-fit circle, and glenoid height/width methods was 9.4% ± 6.7%, 14.3% ± 6.8%, and 17.6% ± 7.3%, respectively. The ACSA method showed excellent interobserver reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 versus those for the best-fit circle (ICC, 0.71) and glenoid height/width (ICC, 0.79) methods. CONCLUSION: Quantification of instability-related glenoid bone loss is reliable using the 3D ACSA method. SAGE Publications 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8182205/ /pubmed/34159213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211011058 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Launay, Marine Choudhry, Muhammad Naghman Green, Nicholas Maharaj, Jashint Cutbush, Kenneth Pivonka, Peter Gupta, Ashish Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method |
title | Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior
Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method |
title_full | Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior
Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method |
title_fullStr | Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior
Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior
Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method |
title_short | Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior
Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method |
title_sort | three-dimensional quantification of glenoid bone loss in anterior
shoulder instability: the anatomic concave surface area method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211011058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT launaymarine threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod AT choudhrymuhammadnaghman threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod AT greennicholas threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod AT maharajjashint threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod AT cutbushkenneth threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod AT pivonkapeter threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod AT guptaashish threedimensionalquantificationofglenoidbonelossinanteriorshoulderinstabilitytheanatomicconcavesurfaceareamethod |