Cargando…
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm. METHODS: We performed a compr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276 |
_version_ | 1783704166072320000 |
---|---|
author | Garg, Rajat Singh, Amandeep Aggarwal, Manik Bhalla, Jaideep Mohan, Babu P. Burke, Carol Rustagi, Tarun Chahal, Prabhleen |
author_facet | Garg, Rajat Singh, Amandeep Aggarwal, Manik Bhalla, Jaideep Mohan, Babu P. Burke, Carol Rustagi, Tarun Chahal, Prabhleen |
author_sort | Garg, Rajat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ≥10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR. RESULTS: A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6–9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 and ≥20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4–71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4–73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8–2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81822352021-06-17 Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Garg, Rajat Singh, Amandeep Aggarwal, Manik Bhalla, Jaideep Mohan, Babu P. Burke, Carol Rustagi, Tarun Chahal, Prabhleen Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ≥10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR. RESULTS: A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6–9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 and ≥20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4–71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4–73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8–2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021-05 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8182235/ /pubmed/33910271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Garg, Rajat Singh, Amandeep Aggarwal, Manik Bhalla, Jaideep Mohan, Babu P. Burke, Carol Rustagi, Tarun Chahal, Prabhleen Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for 10 mm or larger nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gargrajat underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singhamandeep underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT aggarwalmanik underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bhallajaideep underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohanbabup underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT burkecarol underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rustagitarun underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chahalprabhleen underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |