Cargando…

Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm. METHODS: We performed a compr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Rajat, Singh, Amandeep, Aggarwal, Manik, Bhalla, Jaideep, Mohan, Babu P., Burke, Carol, Rustagi, Tarun, Chahal, Prabhleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910271
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276
_version_ 1783704166072320000
author Garg, Rajat
Singh, Amandeep
Aggarwal, Manik
Bhalla, Jaideep
Mohan, Babu P.
Burke, Carol
Rustagi, Tarun
Chahal, Prabhleen
author_facet Garg, Rajat
Singh, Amandeep
Aggarwal, Manik
Bhalla, Jaideep
Mohan, Babu P.
Burke, Carol
Rustagi, Tarun
Chahal, Prabhleen
author_sort Garg, Rajat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ≥10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR. RESULTS: A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6–9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 and ≥20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4–71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4–73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8–2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8182235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81822352021-06-17 Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Garg, Rajat Singh, Amandeep Aggarwal, Manik Bhalla, Jaideep Mohan, Babu P. Burke, Carol Rustagi, Tarun Chahal, Prabhleen Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ≥10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR. RESULTS: A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3–12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6–9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 and ≥20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4–71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4–73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8–2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021-05 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8182235/ /pubmed/33910271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Garg, Rajat
Singh, Amandeep
Aggarwal, Manik
Bhalla, Jaideep
Mohan, Babu P.
Burke, Carol
Rustagi, Tarun
Chahal, Prabhleen
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for 10 mm or larger nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910271
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.276
work_keys_str_mv AT gargrajat underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhamandeep underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aggarwalmanik underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhallajaideep underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohanbabup underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT burkecarol underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rustagitarun underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chahalprabhleen underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor10mmorlargernonpedunculatedcolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis