Cargando…
Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnair...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302328 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.138 |
_version_ | 1783704168229240832 |
---|---|
author | Kanno, Yoshihide Ohira, Tetsuya Harada, Yoshihiro Koshita, Shinsuke Ogawa, Takahisa Kusunose, Hiroaki Koike, Yoshiki Yamagata, Taku Sakai, Toshitaka Masu, Kaori Yonamine, Keisuke Miyamoto, Kazuaki Tanaka, Megumi Shimada, Tomohiro Kozakai, Fumisato Endo, Kazuki Okano, Haruka Komabayashi, Daichi Shimizu, Takeshi Suzuki, Shohei Ito, Kei |
author_facet | Kanno, Yoshihide Ohira, Tetsuya Harada, Yoshihiro Koshita, Shinsuke Ogawa, Takahisa Kusunose, Hiroaki Koike, Yoshiki Yamagata, Taku Sakai, Toshitaka Masu, Kaori Yonamine, Keisuke Miyamoto, Kazuaki Tanaka, Megumi Shimada, Tomohiro Kozakai, Fumisato Endo, Kazuki Okano, Haruka Komabayashi, Daichi Shimizu, Takeshi Suzuki, Shohei Ito, Kei |
author_sort | Kanno, Yoshihide |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol sedation was found to be safe-without severe adverse events or accidents-for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81822442021-06-17 Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey Kanno, Yoshihide Ohira, Tetsuya Harada, Yoshihiro Koshita, Shinsuke Ogawa, Takahisa Kusunose, Hiroaki Koike, Yoshiki Yamagata, Taku Sakai, Toshitaka Masu, Kaori Yonamine, Keisuke Miyamoto, Kazuaki Tanaka, Megumi Shimada, Tomohiro Kozakai, Fumisato Endo, Kazuki Okano, Haruka Komabayashi, Daichi Shimizu, Takeshi Suzuki, Shohei Ito, Kei Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol sedation was found to be safe-without severe adverse events or accidents-for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021-05 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8182244/ /pubmed/33302328 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.138 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kanno, Yoshihide Ohira, Tetsuya Harada, Yoshihiro Koshita, Shinsuke Ogawa, Takahisa Kusunose, Hiroaki Koike, Yoshiki Yamagata, Taku Sakai, Toshitaka Masu, Kaori Yonamine, Keisuke Miyamoto, Kazuaki Tanaka, Megumi Shimada, Tomohiro Kozakai, Fumisato Endo, Kazuki Okano, Haruka Komabayashi, Daichi Shimizu, Takeshi Suzuki, Shohei Ito, Kei Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey |
title | Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey |
title_full | Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey |
title_fullStr | Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey |
title_short | Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey |
title_sort | safety and recipient satisfaction of propofol sedation in outpatient endoscopy: a 24-hour prospective investigation using a questionnaire survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302328 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kannoyoshihide safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT ohiratetsuya safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT haradayoshihiro safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT koshitashinsuke safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT ogawatakahisa safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT kusunosehiroaki safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT koikeyoshiki safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT yamagatataku safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT sakaitoshitaka safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT masukaori safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT yonaminekeisuke safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT miyamotokazuaki safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT tanakamegumi safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT shimadatomohiro safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT kozakaifumisato safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT endokazuki safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT okanoharuka safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT komabayashidaichi safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT shimizutakeshi safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT suzukishohei safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey AT itokei safetyandrecipientsatisfactionofpropofolsedationinoutpatientendoscopya24hourprospectiveinvestigationusingaquestionnairesurvey |