Cargando…

Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis

BACKGROUND: We present the first report comparing early toxicity outcomes with high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost upfront versus intensity modulated RT (IMRT) upfront combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as definitive management for intermediate risk or higher prostate cancer. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roy, Amit, Brenneman, Randall J., Hogan, Jacob, Barnes, Justin M., Huang, Yi, Morris, Robert, Goddu, Sreekrishna, Altman, Michael, Garcia-Ramirez, Jose, Li, Harold, Zoberi, Jacqueline E., Bullock, Arnold, Kim, Eric, Smith, Zachary, Figenshau, Robert, Andriole, Gerald L., Baumann, Brian C., Michalski, Jeff M., Gay, Hiram A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.004
_version_ 1783704172684640256
author Roy, Amit
Brenneman, Randall J.
Hogan, Jacob
Barnes, Justin M.
Huang, Yi
Morris, Robert
Goddu, Sreekrishna
Altman, Michael
Garcia-Ramirez, Jose
Li, Harold
Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
Bullock, Arnold
Kim, Eric
Smith, Zachary
Figenshau, Robert
Andriole, Gerald L.
Baumann, Brian C.
Michalski, Jeff M.
Gay, Hiram A.
author_facet Roy, Amit
Brenneman, Randall J.
Hogan, Jacob
Barnes, Justin M.
Huang, Yi
Morris, Robert
Goddu, Sreekrishna
Altman, Michael
Garcia-Ramirez, Jose
Li, Harold
Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
Bullock, Arnold
Kim, Eric
Smith, Zachary
Figenshau, Robert
Andriole, Gerald L.
Baumann, Brian C.
Michalski, Jeff M.
Gay, Hiram A.
author_sort Roy, Amit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We present the first report comparing early toxicity outcomes with high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost upfront versus intensity modulated RT (IMRT) upfront combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as definitive management for intermediate risk or higher prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed all non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who received HDR-BT boost from 2014 to 2019. HDR-BT boost was offered to patients with intermediate-risk disease or higher. ADT use and IMRT target volume was based on NCCN risk group. IMRT dose was typically 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles ± pelvic lymph nodes. HDR-BT dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction, delivered approximately 3 weeks before or after IMRT. The sequence was based on physician preference. Biochemical recurrence was defined per ASTRO definition. Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5.0. Pearson Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare toxicity rates. P-value < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Fifty-eight received HDR-BT upfront (majority 2014–2016) and 57 IMRT upfront (majority 2017–2018). Median follow-up was 26.0 months. The two cohorts were well-balanced for baseline patient/disease characteristics and treatment factors. There were differences in treatment sequence based on the year in which patients received treatment. Overall, rates of grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity were <1%. There was no significant difference in acute or late GI or GU toxicity between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in GI/GU toxicity in intermediate-risk or higher prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-BT boost upfront versus IMRT upfront combined with ADT. These findings suggest that either approach may be reasonable. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8182264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81822642021-06-15 Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis Roy, Amit Brenneman, Randall J. Hogan, Jacob Barnes, Justin M. Huang, Yi Morris, Robert Goddu, Sreekrishna Altman, Michael Garcia-Ramirez, Jose Li, Harold Zoberi, Jacqueline E. Bullock, Arnold Kim, Eric Smith, Zachary Figenshau, Robert Andriole, Gerald L. Baumann, Brian C. Michalski, Jeff M. Gay, Hiram A. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: We present the first report comparing early toxicity outcomes with high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost upfront versus intensity modulated RT (IMRT) upfront combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as definitive management for intermediate risk or higher prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed all non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who received HDR-BT boost from 2014 to 2019. HDR-BT boost was offered to patients with intermediate-risk disease or higher. ADT use and IMRT target volume was based on NCCN risk group. IMRT dose was typically 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles ± pelvic lymph nodes. HDR-BT dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction, delivered approximately 3 weeks before or after IMRT. The sequence was based on physician preference. Biochemical recurrence was defined per ASTRO definition. Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5.0. Pearson Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare toxicity rates. P-value < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Fifty-eight received HDR-BT upfront (majority 2014–2016) and 57 IMRT upfront (majority 2017–2018). Median follow-up was 26.0 months. The two cohorts were well-balanced for baseline patient/disease characteristics and treatment factors. There were differences in treatment sequence based on the year in which patients received treatment. Overall, rates of grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity were <1%. There was no significant difference in acute or late GI or GU toxicity between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in GI/GU toxicity in intermediate-risk or higher prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-BT boost upfront versus IMRT upfront combined with ADT. These findings suggest that either approach may be reasonable. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control. Elsevier 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8182264/ /pubmed/34136665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.004 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Roy, Amit
Brenneman, Randall J.
Hogan, Jacob
Barnes, Justin M.
Huang, Yi
Morris, Robert
Goddu, Sreekrishna
Altman, Michael
Garcia-Ramirez, Jose
Li, Harold
Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
Bullock, Arnold
Kim, Eric
Smith, Zachary
Figenshau, Robert
Andriole, Gerald L.
Baumann, Brian C.
Michalski, Jeff M.
Gay, Hiram A.
Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis
title Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis
title_full Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis
title_fullStr Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis
title_short Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis
title_sort does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and imrt for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? results from a single institution analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT royamit doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT brennemanrandallj doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT hoganjacob doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT barnesjustinm doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT huangyi doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT morrisrobert doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT goddusreekrishna doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT altmanmichael doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT garciaramirezjose doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT liharold doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT zoberijacquelinee doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT bullockarnold doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT kimeric doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT smithzachary doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT figenshaurobert doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT andriolegeraldl doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT baumannbrianc doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT michalskijeffm doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT gayhirama doesthesequenceofhighdoseratebrachytherapyboostandimrtforprostatecancerimpactearlytoxicityoutcomesresultsfromasingleinstitutionanalysis