Cargando…
Internal consistency and compatibility of the 3Rs and 3Vs principles for project evaluation of animal research
Using animals for research raises ethical concerns that are addressed in project evaluation by weighing expected harm to animals against expected benefit to society. A harm–benefit analysis (HBA) relies on two preconditions: (a) the study protocol is scientifically suitable and (b) the use of (senti...
Autores principales: | Eggel, Matthias, Würbel, Hanno |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0023677220968583 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU
por: Eggel, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
3Rs Principle and Legislative Decrees to Achieve High Standard of Animal Research
por: Verderio, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The 3Rs of Animal Research
por: eBioMedicine
Publicado: (2022) -
Principle vs. Policy: Consistency vs. Expediency
Publicado: (1885) -
Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research
por: Kirk, Robert G. W.
Publicado: (2017)