Cargando…

Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research

Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rankl, Felicia, Johnson, Ginger A., Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732321998062
_version_ 1783704179544424448
author Rankl, Felicia
Johnson, Ginger A.
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
author_facet Rankl, Felicia
Johnson, Ginger A.
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
author_sort Rankl, Felicia
collection PubMed
description Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind. In this article, we introduce a reflexivity model we developed for teams undertaking rapid qualitative studies. Utilizing our most recent application of this model to a rapid qualitative appraisal of health care workers’ experiences delivering care during the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we identify the steps to put this model into practice and its main outcomes. Our application of the model revealed that the team’s practices could be grouped along four dimensions: design assumptions, data collection and analysis processes, multidisciplinary collaboration, and responsible dissemination. Reflexivity can improve the relations within the team and the quality of the research output, if it is implemented as a continuous and iterative process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8182295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81822952021-06-21 Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research Rankl, Felicia Johnson, Ginger A. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Qual Health Res Methods Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind. In this article, we introduce a reflexivity model we developed for teams undertaking rapid qualitative studies. Utilizing our most recent application of this model to a rapid qualitative appraisal of health care workers’ experiences delivering care during the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we identify the steps to put this model into practice and its main outcomes. Our application of the model revealed that the team’s practices could be grouped along four dimensions: design assumptions, data collection and analysis processes, multidisciplinary collaboration, and responsible dissemination. Reflexivity can improve the relations within the team and the quality of the research output, if it is implemented as a continuous and iterative process. SAGE Publications 2021-03-20 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8182295/ /pubmed/33745367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732321998062 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Lficense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Methods
Rankl, Felicia
Johnson, Ginger A.
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
title Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
title_full Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
title_fullStr Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
title_full_unstemmed Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
title_short Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
title_sort examining what we know in relation to how we know it: a team-based reflexivity model for rapid qualitative health research
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732321998062
work_keys_str_mv AT ranklfelicia examiningwhatweknowinrelationtohowweknowitateambasedreflexivitymodelforrapidqualitativehealthresearch
AT johnsongingera examiningwhatweknowinrelationtohowweknowitateambasedreflexivitymodelforrapidqualitativehealthresearch
AT vindrolapadroscecilia examiningwhatweknowinrelationtohowweknowitateambasedreflexivitymodelforrapidqualitativehealthresearch