Cargando…
Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research
Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732321998062 |
_version_ | 1783704179544424448 |
---|---|
author | Rankl, Felicia Johnson, Ginger A. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia |
author_facet | Rankl, Felicia Johnson, Ginger A. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia |
author_sort | Rankl, Felicia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind. In this article, we introduce a reflexivity model we developed for teams undertaking rapid qualitative studies. Utilizing our most recent application of this model to a rapid qualitative appraisal of health care workers’ experiences delivering care during the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we identify the steps to put this model into practice and its main outcomes. Our application of the model revealed that the team’s practices could be grouped along four dimensions: design assumptions, data collection and analysis processes, multidisciplinary collaboration, and responsible dissemination. Reflexivity can improve the relations within the team and the quality of the research output, if it is implemented as a continuous and iterative process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81822952021-06-21 Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research Rankl, Felicia Johnson, Ginger A. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Qual Health Res Methods Reflexivity constitutes a core component of qualitative research and has been actively integrated into long-term and “lone ranger” approaches to qualitative research. However, its application to team-based approaches and particularly to rapid qualitative team-based approaches continues to lag behind. In this article, we introduce a reflexivity model we developed for teams undertaking rapid qualitative studies. Utilizing our most recent application of this model to a rapid qualitative appraisal of health care workers’ experiences delivering care during the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we identify the steps to put this model into practice and its main outcomes. Our application of the model revealed that the team’s practices could be grouped along four dimensions: design assumptions, data collection and analysis processes, multidisciplinary collaboration, and responsible dissemination. Reflexivity can improve the relations within the team and the quality of the research output, if it is implemented as a continuous and iterative process. SAGE Publications 2021-03-20 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8182295/ /pubmed/33745367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732321998062 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Lficense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Methods Rankl, Felicia Johnson, Ginger A. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health Research |
title | Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A
Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health
Research |
title_full | Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A
Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health
Research |
title_fullStr | Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A
Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health
Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A
Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health
Research |
title_short | Examining What We Know in Relation to How We Know It: A
Team-Based Reflexivity Model for Rapid Qualitative Health
Research |
title_sort | examining what we know in relation to how we know it: a
team-based reflexivity model for rapid qualitative health
research |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732321998062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranklfelicia examiningwhatweknowinrelationtohowweknowitateambasedreflexivitymodelforrapidqualitativehealthresearch AT johnsongingera examiningwhatweknowinrelationtohowweknowitateambasedreflexivitymodelforrapidqualitativehealthresearch AT vindrolapadroscecilia examiningwhatweknowinrelationtohowweknowitateambasedreflexivitymodelforrapidqualitativehealthresearch |