Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species
In 2012, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of acetic acid when used as a technological additive (preservative) for all animal species. The characterisation and condition of use of the additive are the same...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6615 |
_version_ | 1783704251700084736 |
---|---|
author | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Fašmon Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla López‐Gálvez, Gloria Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo Vettori, Maria Vittoria |
author_facet | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Fašmon Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla López‐Gálvez, Gloria Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo Vettori, Maria Vittoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2012, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of acetic acid when used as a technological additive (preservative) for all animal species. The characterisation and condition of use of the additive are the same as those already assessed by the FEEDAP Panel in the previous opinion on acetic acid. Acetic acid produced with the new manufacturing process complies with the specifications set by Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The FEEDAP Panel considers that the conclusions reached in the previous assessment apply to the acetic acid produced by the new manufacturing process. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is considered safe for poultry, pigs and pet animals at a maximum concentration of 2.5 g acetic acid/kg complete feed (or 1 g/L water for drinking). The known high endogenous production of acetic acid in the ruminants shows that the tolerance of these target animals is considerably higher. No data is available for salmonids. The use of the additive in animal nutrition is of no concern for consumer safety. The risks for users handling the additive depend on the concentration and include skin, eyes, and respiratory tract irritation (10–25% solution) and corrosion (> 25% solution). The use of the additive as a feed additive is considered safe for the environment. The Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious as preservative in feedingstuffs and water for drinking. The FEEDAP Panel has some reservations about the effectiveness of acetic acid as preservative in dry feedingstuffs with a typical moisture content of ≤ 12%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81826472021-06-16 Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Fašmon Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla López‐Gálvez, Gloria Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo Vettori, Maria Vittoria EFSA J Scientific Opinion In 2012, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of acetic acid when used as a technological additive (preservative) for all animal species. The characterisation and condition of use of the additive are the same as those already assessed by the FEEDAP Panel in the previous opinion on acetic acid. Acetic acid produced with the new manufacturing process complies with the specifications set by Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The FEEDAP Panel considers that the conclusions reached in the previous assessment apply to the acetic acid produced by the new manufacturing process. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is considered safe for poultry, pigs and pet animals at a maximum concentration of 2.5 g acetic acid/kg complete feed (or 1 g/L water for drinking). The known high endogenous production of acetic acid in the ruminants shows that the tolerance of these target animals is considerably higher. No data is available for salmonids. The use of the additive in animal nutrition is of no concern for consumer safety. The risks for users handling the additive depend on the concentration and include skin, eyes, and respiratory tract irritation (10–25% solution) and corrosion (> 25% solution). The use of the additive as a feed additive is considered safe for the environment. The Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious as preservative in feedingstuffs and water for drinking. The FEEDAP Panel has some reservations about the effectiveness of acetic acid as preservative in dry feedingstuffs with a typical moisture content of ≤ 12%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8182647/ /pubmed/34140991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6615 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Fašmon Durjava, Mojca Kouba, Maryline López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Gregoretti, Lucilla López‐Gálvez, Gloria Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo Vettori, Maria Vittoria Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
title | Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT christensenhenrik safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT dusemundbirgit safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT fasmondurjavamojca safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT marconfrancesca safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT pechovaalena safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT petkovamariana safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT sanzyolanda safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT woutersenruud safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT galobartjaume safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT gregorettilucilla safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT lopezgalvezgloria safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT innocentimatteolorenzo safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies AT vettorimariavittoria safetyandefficacyofafeedadditiveconsistingofaceticacidforallanimalspecies |