Cargando…
Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and its early detection is critical to achieving a curative treatment and to reducing mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a highly sensitive technique for detecting noninvasive small lung tumors in high-risk population...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164287 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-677 |
_version_ | 1783704261274632192 |
---|---|
author | Novellis, Pierluigi Cominesi, Silvia Raimondi Rossetti, Francesca Mondoni, Michele Gregorc, Vanesa Veronesi, Giulia |
author_facet | Novellis, Pierluigi Cominesi, Silvia Raimondi Rossetti, Francesca Mondoni, Michele Gregorc, Vanesa Veronesi, Giulia |
author_sort | Novellis, Pierluigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and its early detection is critical to achieving a curative treatment and to reducing mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a highly sensitive technique for detecting noninvasive small lung tumors in high-risk populations. We here analyze the current status of lung cancer screening (LCS) from a European point of view. With economic burden of health care in most European countries resting on the state, it is important to reduce costs of screening and improve its effectiveness. Current cost-effectiveness analyses on LCS have indicated a favorable economic profile. The most recently published analysis reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3,297 per 1 life-year gained adjusted for the quality of life (QALY) and €2,944 per life-year gained, demonstrating a 90% probability of ICER being below €15,000 and a 98.1% probability of being below €25,000. Different risk models have been used to identify the target population; among these, the PLCOM2012 in particular allows for the selection of the population to be screened with high sensitivity. Risk models should also be employed to define screening intervals, which can reduce the general number of LDCT scans after the baseline round. Future perspectives of screening in a European scenario are related to the will of the policy makers to implement policy on a large scale and to improve the effectiveness of a broad screening of smoking-related disease, including cardiovascular prevention, by measuring coronary calcium score on LDCT. The employment of artificial intelligence (AI) in imaging interpretation, the use of liquid biopsies for the characterization of CT-detected undetermined nodules, and less invasive, personalized surgical treatments, will improve the effectiveness of LCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81827052021-06-22 Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives Novellis, Pierluigi Cominesi, Silvia Raimondi Rossetti, Francesca Mondoni, Michele Gregorc, Vanesa Veronesi, Giulia Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article on Lung Cancer Screening Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and its early detection is critical to achieving a curative treatment and to reducing mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a highly sensitive technique for detecting noninvasive small lung tumors in high-risk populations. We here analyze the current status of lung cancer screening (LCS) from a European point of view. With economic burden of health care in most European countries resting on the state, it is important to reduce costs of screening and improve its effectiveness. Current cost-effectiveness analyses on LCS have indicated a favorable economic profile. The most recently published analysis reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3,297 per 1 life-year gained adjusted for the quality of life (QALY) and €2,944 per life-year gained, demonstrating a 90% probability of ICER being below €15,000 and a 98.1% probability of being below €25,000. Different risk models have been used to identify the target population; among these, the PLCOM2012 in particular allows for the selection of the population to be screened with high sensitivity. Risk models should also be employed to define screening intervals, which can reduce the general number of LDCT scans after the baseline round. Future perspectives of screening in a European scenario are related to the will of the policy makers to implement policy on a large scale and to improve the effectiveness of a broad screening of smoking-related disease, including cardiovascular prevention, by measuring coronary calcium score on LDCT. The employment of artificial intelligence (AI) in imaging interpretation, the use of liquid biopsies for the characterization of CT-detected undetermined nodules, and less invasive, personalized surgical treatments, will improve the effectiveness of LCS. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8182705/ /pubmed/34164287 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-677 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Lung Cancer Screening Novellis, Pierluigi Cominesi, Silvia Raimondi Rossetti, Francesca Mondoni, Michele Gregorc, Vanesa Veronesi, Giulia Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives |
title | Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives |
title_full | Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives |
title_fullStr | Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives |
title_short | Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives |
title_sort | lung cancer screening: who pays? who receives? the european perspectives |
topic | Review Article on Lung Cancer Screening |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164287 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT novellispierluigi lungcancerscreeningwhopayswhoreceivestheeuropeanperspectives AT cominesisilviaraimondi lungcancerscreeningwhopayswhoreceivestheeuropeanperspectives AT rossettifrancesca lungcancerscreeningwhopayswhoreceivestheeuropeanperspectives AT mondonimichele lungcancerscreeningwhopayswhoreceivestheeuropeanperspectives AT gregorcvanesa lungcancerscreeningwhopayswhoreceivestheeuropeanperspectives AT veronesigiulia lungcancerscreeningwhopayswhoreceivestheeuropeanperspectives |