Cargando…

Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials

Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumoto, Hiromi, Horita, Nobuyuki, Ito, Kentaro, Ebina-Shibuya, Risa, Hara, Yu, Kobayashi, Nobuaki, Kaneko, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164275
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1120
_version_ 1783704261767462912
author Matsumoto, Hiromi
Horita, Nobuyuki
Ito, Kentaro
Ebina-Shibuya, Risa
Hara, Yu
Kobayashi, Nobuaki
Kaneko, Takeshi
author_facet Matsumoto, Hiromi
Horita, Nobuyuki
Ito, Kentaro
Ebina-Shibuya, Risa
Hara, Yu
Kobayashi, Nobuaki
Kaneko, Takeshi
author_sort Matsumoto, Hiromi
collection PubMed
description Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-first-line chemotherapy. Objective response rate might be easily affected by chance because the small number of patients in each trial achieved complete or partial response in the phase II non-first-line setting. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000040412). Four databases were searched for eligible trials. A Spearman’s rank correlation with hazard ratio of overall survival was calculated each for odds ratio of objective response rate, difference of objective response rate (%), odds ratio of disease control rate, and difference of disease control rate (%). Of 74 eligible trials, 73 reported objective response rate and 68 reported disease control rates. Nine (12%) trials included patients with driver mutation status. Thirteen (18%) and two (3%) RCTs specifically included adenocarcinoma/non-squamous and squamous subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0−2 (N=41, 55%) and the performance status 0-1 (N=25, 34%) were frequently used performance status criteria. The median number of patients in the two arms was 116 (interquartile range, 82–159). The correlation between trial-level odds ratio of objective response rate and hazard ratio of overall survival was weak (r=−0.29, 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.05, P=0.014). An exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that fewer responders were associated with poorer correlation. Odds ratio of disease control survival (r=−0.53, 95% CI: −0.68 to −0.32, P<0.001) had moderate rank correlations with hazard ratio of overall survival. Instead of objective response rate, disease control rate should be used as the primary endpoint in a randomized phase II trial evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8182707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81827072021-06-22 Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials Matsumoto, Hiromi Horita, Nobuyuki Ito, Kentaro Ebina-Shibuya, Risa Hara, Yu Kobayashi, Nobuaki Kaneko, Takeshi Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-first-line chemotherapy. Objective response rate might be easily affected by chance because the small number of patients in each trial achieved complete or partial response in the phase II non-first-line setting. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000040412). Four databases were searched for eligible trials. A Spearman’s rank correlation with hazard ratio of overall survival was calculated each for odds ratio of objective response rate, difference of objective response rate (%), odds ratio of disease control rate, and difference of disease control rate (%). Of 74 eligible trials, 73 reported objective response rate and 68 reported disease control rates. Nine (12%) trials included patients with driver mutation status. Thirteen (18%) and two (3%) RCTs specifically included adenocarcinoma/non-squamous and squamous subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0−2 (N=41, 55%) and the performance status 0-1 (N=25, 34%) were frequently used performance status criteria. The median number of patients in the two arms was 116 (interquartile range, 82–159). The correlation between trial-level odds ratio of objective response rate and hazard ratio of overall survival was weak (r=−0.29, 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.05, P=0.014). An exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that fewer responders were associated with poorer correlation. Odds ratio of disease control survival (r=−0.53, 95% CI: −0.68 to −0.32, P<0.001) had moderate rank correlations with hazard ratio of overall survival. Instead of objective response rate, disease control rate should be used as the primary endpoint in a randomized phase II trial evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8182707/ /pubmed/34164275 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1120 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Matsumoto, Hiromi
Horita, Nobuyuki
Ito, Kentaro
Ebina-Shibuya, Risa
Hara, Yu
Kobayashi, Nobuaki
Kaneko, Takeshi
Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
title Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
title_full Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
title_fullStr Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
title_full_unstemmed Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
title_short Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
title_sort disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase ii trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164275
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1120
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumotohiromi diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials
AT horitanobuyuki diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials
AT itokentaro diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials
AT ebinashibuyarisa diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials
AT harayu diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials
AT kobayashinobuaki diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials
AT kanekotakeshi diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials