Cargando…
Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials
Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164275 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1120 |
_version_ | 1783704261767462912 |
---|---|
author | Matsumoto, Hiromi Horita, Nobuyuki Ito, Kentaro Ebina-Shibuya, Risa Hara, Yu Kobayashi, Nobuaki Kaneko, Takeshi |
author_facet | Matsumoto, Hiromi Horita, Nobuyuki Ito, Kentaro Ebina-Shibuya, Risa Hara, Yu Kobayashi, Nobuaki Kaneko, Takeshi |
author_sort | Matsumoto, Hiromi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-first-line chemotherapy. Objective response rate might be easily affected by chance because the small number of patients in each trial achieved complete or partial response in the phase II non-first-line setting. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000040412). Four databases were searched for eligible trials. A Spearman’s rank correlation with hazard ratio of overall survival was calculated each for odds ratio of objective response rate, difference of objective response rate (%), odds ratio of disease control rate, and difference of disease control rate (%). Of 74 eligible trials, 73 reported objective response rate and 68 reported disease control rates. Nine (12%) trials included patients with driver mutation status. Thirteen (18%) and two (3%) RCTs specifically included adenocarcinoma/non-squamous and squamous subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0−2 (N=41, 55%) and the performance status 0-1 (N=25, 34%) were frequently used performance status criteria. The median number of patients in the two arms was 116 (interquartile range, 82–159). The correlation between trial-level odds ratio of objective response rate and hazard ratio of overall survival was weak (r=−0.29, 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.05, P=0.014). An exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that fewer responders were associated with poorer correlation. Odds ratio of disease control survival (r=−0.53, 95% CI: −0.68 to −0.32, P<0.001) had moderate rank correlations with hazard ratio of overall survival. Instead of objective response rate, disease control rate should be used as the primary endpoint in a randomized phase II trial evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81827072021-06-22 Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials Matsumoto, Hiromi Horita, Nobuyuki Ito, Kentaro Ebina-Shibuya, Risa Hara, Yu Kobayashi, Nobuaki Kaneko, Takeshi Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article Although objective response rate and disease control rate are commonly used as primary endpoints of lung cancer trials, it remains unclear whether objective response rate and disease control rate correctly reflect the overall survival in a non-small cell lung cancer phase II trial evaluating a non-first-line chemotherapy. Objective response rate might be easily affected by chance because the small number of patients in each trial achieved complete or partial response in the phase II non-first-line setting. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (UMIN000040412). Four databases were searched for eligible trials. A Spearman’s rank correlation with hazard ratio of overall survival was calculated each for odds ratio of objective response rate, difference of objective response rate (%), odds ratio of disease control rate, and difference of disease control rate (%). Of 74 eligible trials, 73 reported objective response rate and 68 reported disease control rates. Nine (12%) trials included patients with driver mutation status. Thirteen (18%) and two (3%) RCTs specifically included adenocarcinoma/non-squamous and squamous subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0−2 (N=41, 55%) and the performance status 0-1 (N=25, 34%) were frequently used performance status criteria. The median number of patients in the two arms was 116 (interquartile range, 82–159). The correlation between trial-level odds ratio of objective response rate and hazard ratio of overall survival was weak (r=−0.29, 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.05, P=0.014). An exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that fewer responders were associated with poorer correlation. Odds ratio of disease control survival (r=−0.53, 95% CI: −0.68 to −0.32, P<0.001) had moderate rank correlations with hazard ratio of overall survival. Instead of objective response rate, disease control rate should be used as the primary endpoint in a randomized phase II trial evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8182707/ /pubmed/34164275 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1120 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Matsumoto, Hiromi Horita, Nobuyuki Ito, Kentaro Ebina-Shibuya, Risa Hara, Yu Kobayashi, Nobuaki Kaneko, Takeshi Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
title | Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
title_full | Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
title_fullStr | Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
title_short | Disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase II trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
title_sort | disease control and objective responsive rates in randomized phase ii trials evaluating non-first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of 74 trials |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164275 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsumotohiromi diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials AT horitanobuyuki diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials AT itokentaro diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials AT ebinashibuyarisa diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials AT harayu diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials AT kobayashinobuaki diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials AT kanekotakeshi diseasecontrolandobjectiveresponsiveratesinrandomizedphaseiitrialsevaluatingnonfirstlinechemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewof74trials |