Cargando…
Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules?
The increasing use of low-dose CT for screening for lung cancer will inevitably identify many small, asymptomatic lung nodules and ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Current guidelines for the management of screening-detected lesions tend to advise a conservative approach based on serial imaging and int...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164289 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.04.06 |
_version_ | 1783704262478397440 |
---|---|
author | Sihoe, Alan D. L. |
author_facet | Sihoe, Alan D. L. |
author_sort | Sihoe, Alan D. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increasing use of low-dose CT for screening for lung cancer will inevitably identify many small, asymptomatic lung nodules and ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Current guidelines for the management of screening-detected lesions tend to advise a conservative approach based on serial imaging and intervention only if ‘suspicious’ features emerge. However, more recent developments in thoracic surgery and in the understanding of the screening-detected lesions themselves prompt some pertinent questions over this conservatism. Is CT surveillance sufficiently reliable to exclude malignancy? Is it really necessary to hold back on operative biopsy and resection given modern surgical safety and efficacy? Is the option for early surgical therapy a viable one—especially with the availability of sublobar resection today? Modern data suggests that the risk of inaction for some screening-detected lesions may be higher than expected, whereas the potential harm of surgical intervention may be substantially reduced by sublobar resection and the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques. A more pro-active approach towards offering surgery for screening-detected lesions should now be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81827102021-06-22 Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? Sihoe, Alan D. L. Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article on Lung Cancer Screening The increasing use of low-dose CT for screening for lung cancer will inevitably identify many small, asymptomatic lung nodules and ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Current guidelines for the management of screening-detected lesions tend to advise a conservative approach based on serial imaging and intervention only if ‘suspicious’ features emerge. However, more recent developments in thoracic surgery and in the understanding of the screening-detected lesions themselves prompt some pertinent questions over this conservatism. Is CT surveillance sufficiently reliable to exclude malignancy? Is it really necessary to hold back on operative biopsy and resection given modern surgical safety and efficacy? Is the option for early surgical therapy a viable one—especially with the availability of sublobar resection today? Modern data suggests that the risk of inaction for some screening-detected lesions may be higher than expected, whereas the potential harm of surgical intervention may be substantially reduced by sublobar resection and the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques. A more pro-active approach towards offering surgery for screening-detected lesions should now be considered. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8182710/ /pubmed/34164289 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.04.06 Text en 2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Lung Cancer Screening Sihoe, Alan D. L. Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
title | Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
title_full | Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
title_fullStr | Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
title_short | Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
title_sort | should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules? |
topic | Review Article on Lung Cancer Screening |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164289 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.04.06 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sihoealandl shouldsublobarresectionbeofferedforscreeningdetectedlungnodules |