Cargando…
Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions
BACKGROUND: Older persons with polypharmacy are at increased risk of harm from medications. Therefore, it is important that physicians and nurses, together with the persons, evaluate medications to avoid hazardous polypharmacy. It remains unclear how healthcare professionals experience such evaluati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06518-w |
_version_ | 1783704278301409280 |
---|---|
author | Holmqvist, Malin Thor, Johan Ros, Axel Johansson, Linda |
author_facet | Holmqvist, Malin Thor, Johan Ros, Axel Johansson, Linda |
author_sort | Holmqvist, Malin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Older persons with polypharmacy are at increased risk of harm from medications. Therefore, it is important that physicians and nurses, together with the persons, evaluate medications to avoid hazardous polypharmacy. It remains unclear how healthcare professionals experience such evaluations. This study aimed to explore physicians’ and nurses’ experiences from evaluations of older persons’ medications, and their related actions to manage concerns related to the evaluations. METHOD: Individual interview data from 29 physicians and nurses were collected and analysed according to the critical incident technique. RESULTS: The medication evaluation for older persons was influenced by the working conditions (e.g. healthcare professionals’ clinical knowledge, experiences, and situational conditions) and working in partnership (e.g. cooperating around and with the older person). Actions taken to manage these evaluations were related to working with a plan (e.g. performing day-to-day work and planning for continued treatment) and collaborative problem-solving (e.g. finding a solution, involving the older person, and communicating with colleagues). CONCLUSION: Working conditions and cooperation with colleagues, the older persons and their formal or informal caregivers, emerged as important factors related to the medication evaluation. By adjusting their performance to variations in these conditions, healthcare professionals contributed to the resilience of the healthcare system by its capacity to prevent, notice and mitigate medication problems. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that a joint plan for continued treatment could facilitate such resilience, if it articulates what to observe, when to act, who should act and what actions to take in case of deviations from what is expected. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06518-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8182897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81828972021-06-09 Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions Holmqvist, Malin Thor, Johan Ros, Axel Johansson, Linda BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Older persons with polypharmacy are at increased risk of harm from medications. Therefore, it is important that physicians and nurses, together with the persons, evaluate medications to avoid hazardous polypharmacy. It remains unclear how healthcare professionals experience such evaluations. This study aimed to explore physicians’ and nurses’ experiences from evaluations of older persons’ medications, and their related actions to manage concerns related to the evaluations. METHOD: Individual interview data from 29 physicians and nurses were collected and analysed according to the critical incident technique. RESULTS: The medication evaluation for older persons was influenced by the working conditions (e.g. healthcare professionals’ clinical knowledge, experiences, and situational conditions) and working in partnership (e.g. cooperating around and with the older person). Actions taken to manage these evaluations were related to working with a plan (e.g. performing day-to-day work and planning for continued treatment) and collaborative problem-solving (e.g. finding a solution, involving the older person, and communicating with colleagues). CONCLUSION: Working conditions and cooperation with colleagues, the older persons and their formal or informal caregivers, emerged as important factors related to the medication evaluation. By adjusting their performance to variations in these conditions, healthcare professionals contributed to the resilience of the healthcare system by its capacity to prevent, notice and mitigate medication problems. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that a joint plan for continued treatment could facilitate such resilience, if it articulates what to observe, when to act, who should act and what actions to take in case of deviations from what is expected. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06518-w. BioMed Central 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8182897/ /pubmed/34098957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06518-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Holmqvist, Malin Thor, Johan Ros, Axel Johansson, Linda Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
title | Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
title_full | Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
title_short | Evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
title_sort | evaluation of older persons’ medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences and actions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06518-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmqvistmalin evaluationofolderpersonsmedicationsacriticalincidenttechniquestudyexploringhealthcareprofessionalsexperiencesandactions AT thorjohan evaluationofolderpersonsmedicationsacriticalincidenttechniquestudyexploringhealthcareprofessionalsexperiencesandactions AT rosaxel evaluationofolderpersonsmedicationsacriticalincidenttechniquestudyexploringhealthcareprofessionalsexperiencesandactions AT johanssonlinda evaluationofolderpersonsmedicationsacriticalincidenttechniquestudyexploringhealthcareprofessionalsexperiencesandactions |