Cargando…

Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND: There is general scarcity of research on key elements of implementation processes and the factors which impact implementation success. Implementation of healthcare interventions is a complex process. Tools to support implementation can facilitate this process and improve effectiveness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker, Gillian, Kastner, Monika, Born, Karen, Berta, Whitney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06501-5
_version_ 1783704315654832128
author Parker, Gillian
Kastner, Monika
Born, Karen
Berta, Whitney
author_facet Parker, Gillian
Kastner, Monika
Born, Karen
Berta, Whitney
author_sort Parker, Gillian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is general scarcity of research on key elements of implementation processes and the factors which impact implementation success. Implementation of healthcare interventions is a complex process. Tools to support implementation can facilitate this process and improve effectiveness of the interventions and clinical outcomes. Understanding the impact of implementation support tools is a critical aspect of this process. The objective of this study was to solicit knowledge and agreement from relevant implementation science and knowledge translation healthcare experts in order to develop a process model of key elements in the implementation process. METHODS: A two round, modified Delphi study involving international experts in knowledge translation and implementation (researchers, scientists, professors, decision-makers) was conducted. Participants rated and commented on all aspects of the process model, including the organization, content, scope, and structure. Delphi questions rated at 75% agreement or lower were reviewed and revised. Qualitative comments supported the restructuring and refinement. A second-round survey followed the same process as Round 1. RESULTS: Fifty-four experts participated in Round 1, and 32 experts participated in Round 2. Twelve percent (n = 6) of the Round 1 questions did not reach agreement. Key themes for revision and refinement were: stakeholder engagement throughout the process, iterative nature of the implementation process; importance of context; and importance of using guiding theories or frameworks. The process model was revised and refined based on the quantitative and qualitative data and reassessed by the experts in Round 2. Agreement was achieved on all items in Round 2 and the Delphi concluded. Additional feedback was obtained regarding terminology, target users and definition of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of agreement were attained for all sub-domains, elements, and sub-elements of the Implementation Process Model. This model will be used to develop an Implementation Support Tool to be used by healthcare providers to facilitate effective implementation and improved clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8183077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81830772021-06-09 Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study Parker, Gillian Kastner, Monika Born, Karen Berta, Whitney BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is general scarcity of research on key elements of implementation processes and the factors which impact implementation success. Implementation of healthcare interventions is a complex process. Tools to support implementation can facilitate this process and improve effectiveness of the interventions and clinical outcomes. Understanding the impact of implementation support tools is a critical aspect of this process. The objective of this study was to solicit knowledge and agreement from relevant implementation science and knowledge translation healthcare experts in order to develop a process model of key elements in the implementation process. METHODS: A two round, modified Delphi study involving international experts in knowledge translation and implementation (researchers, scientists, professors, decision-makers) was conducted. Participants rated and commented on all aspects of the process model, including the organization, content, scope, and structure. Delphi questions rated at 75% agreement or lower were reviewed and revised. Qualitative comments supported the restructuring and refinement. A second-round survey followed the same process as Round 1. RESULTS: Fifty-four experts participated in Round 1, and 32 experts participated in Round 2. Twelve percent (n = 6) of the Round 1 questions did not reach agreement. Key themes for revision and refinement were: stakeholder engagement throughout the process, iterative nature of the implementation process; importance of context; and importance of using guiding theories or frameworks. The process model was revised and refined based on the quantitative and qualitative data and reassessed by the experts in Round 2. Agreement was achieved on all items in Round 2 and the Delphi concluded. Additional feedback was obtained regarding terminology, target users and definition of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of agreement were attained for all sub-domains, elements, and sub-elements of the Implementation Process Model. This model will be used to develop an Implementation Support Tool to be used by healthcare providers to facilitate effective implementation and improved clinical outcomes. BioMed Central 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8183077/ /pubmed/34098952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06501-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parker, Gillian
Kastner, Monika
Born, Karen
Berta, Whitney
Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
title Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
title_full Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
title_short Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
title_sort development of an implementation process model: a delphi study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06501-5
work_keys_str_mv AT parkergillian developmentofanimplementationprocessmodeladelphistudy
AT kastnermonika developmentofanimplementationprocessmodeladelphistudy
AT bornkaren developmentofanimplementationprocessmodeladelphistudy
AT bertawhitney developmentofanimplementationprocessmodeladelphistudy