Cargando…

Digital image processing: a useful tool in the analysis of lung injuries caused by chronic inhalation of agricultural herbicides

The herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is widely used in agriculture to control various weeds. The objective of this study was to use the digital image processing method to identify alveolar lesions in the lungs of rats submitted to chronic 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) inhala...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Junior, Claudio Pedrassoli, Cavallieri, Gabriela Vidotto, da Silva, Francisco Assis, Fernandes, Geovana Letícia, Nai, Gisele Alborghetti, Salge, Ana Karina Marques, Puhle, Josiano Guilherme, de Resende e Silva, Debora Tavares, Pereira, Danillo Roberto, de Azevedo Mello, Fabíola, Favareto, Ana Paula Alves, Rossi, Renata Calciolari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14692-x
Descripción
Sumario:The herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is widely used in agriculture to control various weeds. The objective of this study was to use the digital image processing method to identify alveolar lesions in the lungs of rats submitted to chronic 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) inhalation exposure. We used forty adult male Wistar rats. The rats were divided into four groups: control group (CG), low concentration group (LCG), medium concentration group (MCG), and high concentration group (HCG). In a 6-month exposure period, we used two boxes connected to ultrasonic nebulizers for herbicide spraying. After this period, the rats were euthanized for the collection and study of lung tissue. For each image, counts of injuries and blisters were performed automatically using a methodology based on digital image processing techniques. For analysis of the results, an electronic database (Excel®) was created. We used the Pearson method for correlation analysis; values of p <0.05 were considered significant. In the evaluation of healthy alveoli, we recorded positive and significant correlations between analysis from a pathologist and computational analysis. In the evaluation of injured alveoli, we recorded a positive but non-significant correlation between analysis from a pathologist and computational analysis. These results show the effectiveness of digital image processing when evaluating alveolar integrity.