Cargando…

Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability

A uterine transplantation is a nonvital, quality-of-life–enhancing solid organ transplant. Given improvements in donor risk profile and the anticipated shortage of suitable deceased donors, nondirected donation could facilitate sustainability as uterine transplantation moves from research into the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Benjamin P., Rajamanoharan, Abirami, Williams, Nicola J., Vali, Saaliha, Saso, Srdjan, Mantrali, Ifigenia, Jalmbrant, Maria, Thum, Meen-Yau, Diaz-Garcia, Cesar, Ghaem-Maghami, Sadaf, Wilkinson, Stephen, Quiroga, Isabel, Friend, Peter, Yazbek, Joseph, Smith, J. Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001124
_version_ 1783704425561325568
author Jones, Benjamin P.
Rajamanoharan, Abirami
Williams, Nicola J.
Vali, Saaliha
Saso, Srdjan
Mantrali, Ifigenia
Jalmbrant, Maria
Thum, Meen-Yau
Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
Ghaem-Maghami, Sadaf
Wilkinson, Stephen
Quiroga, Isabel
Friend, Peter
Yazbek, Joseph
Smith, J. Richard
author_facet Jones, Benjamin P.
Rajamanoharan, Abirami
Williams, Nicola J.
Vali, Saaliha
Saso, Srdjan
Mantrali, Ifigenia
Jalmbrant, Maria
Thum, Meen-Yau
Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
Ghaem-Maghami, Sadaf
Wilkinson, Stephen
Quiroga, Isabel
Friend, Peter
Yazbek, Joseph
Smith, J. Richard
author_sort Jones, Benjamin P.
collection PubMed
description A uterine transplantation is a nonvital, quality-of-life–enhancing solid organ transplant. Given improvements in donor risk profile and the anticipated shortage of suitable deceased donors, nondirected donation could facilitate sustainability as uterine transplantation moves from research into the clinical realm. The aim of this article is to determine perceptions and identify motivations of potential nondirected living uterus donors and assess acceptability and suitability. METHODS. A cross-sectional survey using an electronic questionnaire among women who have inquired about donating their uterus for uterine transplantation. RESULTS. The majority of respondents “strongly agreed” or “agreed” that the most prevalent motivations to donate their uterus include helping someone carry and give birth to their own baby (n = 150; 99%), helping others (n = 147; 97%), and because they no longer need their womb (n = 147; 97%). After considering risks of uterus donation, the majority were still keen to donate their uterus (n = 144; 95%), but following a process of exclusion using donor selection criteria, less than a third (n = 42; 29%) were found to be suitable to proceed. CONCLUSIONS. This study demonstrates novel insight into the motivations of women who wish to donate their uterus and displays high levels of acceptability after consideration of the risks involved. Despite the physical risk and transient impact upon ability to undertake activities of daily living, women who donate their uterus expect to gain psychological and emotional benefits from enabling another woman to gestate and give birth to their own future children. However, currently used selection criteria reduce the number of potential donors significantly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8183710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81837102021-06-07 Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability Jones, Benjamin P. Rajamanoharan, Abirami Williams, Nicola J. Vali, Saaliha Saso, Srdjan Mantrali, Ifigenia Jalmbrant, Maria Thum, Meen-Yau Diaz-Garcia, Cesar Ghaem-Maghami, Sadaf Wilkinson, Stephen Quiroga, Isabel Friend, Peter Yazbek, Joseph Smith, J. Richard Transplant Direct Organ Donation and Procurement A uterine transplantation is a nonvital, quality-of-life–enhancing solid organ transplant. Given improvements in donor risk profile and the anticipated shortage of suitable deceased donors, nondirected donation could facilitate sustainability as uterine transplantation moves from research into the clinical realm. The aim of this article is to determine perceptions and identify motivations of potential nondirected living uterus donors and assess acceptability and suitability. METHODS. A cross-sectional survey using an electronic questionnaire among women who have inquired about donating their uterus for uterine transplantation. RESULTS. The majority of respondents “strongly agreed” or “agreed” that the most prevalent motivations to donate their uterus include helping someone carry and give birth to their own baby (n = 150; 99%), helping others (n = 147; 97%), and because they no longer need their womb (n = 147; 97%). After considering risks of uterus donation, the majority were still keen to donate their uterus (n = 144; 95%), but following a process of exclusion using donor selection criteria, less than a third (n = 42; 29%) were found to be suitable to proceed. CONCLUSIONS. This study demonstrates novel insight into the motivations of women who wish to donate their uterus and displays high levels of acceptability after consideration of the risks involved. Despite the physical risk and transient impact upon ability to undertake activities of daily living, women who donate their uterus expect to gain psychological and emotional benefits from enabling another woman to gestate and give birth to their own future children. However, currently used selection criteria reduce the number of potential donors significantly. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8183710/ /pubmed/34104711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001124 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Organ Donation and Procurement
Jones, Benjamin P.
Rajamanoharan, Abirami
Williams, Nicola J.
Vali, Saaliha
Saso, Srdjan
Mantrali, Ifigenia
Jalmbrant, Maria
Thum, Meen-Yau
Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
Ghaem-Maghami, Sadaf
Wilkinson, Stephen
Quiroga, Isabel
Friend, Peter
Yazbek, Joseph
Smith, J. Richard
Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability
title Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability
title_full Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability
title_fullStr Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability
title_short Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability
title_sort uterine transplantation using living donation: a cross-sectional study assessing perceptions, acceptability, and suitability
topic Organ Donation and Procurement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001124
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesbenjaminp uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT rajamanoharanabirami uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT williamsnicolaj uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT valisaaliha uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT sasosrdjan uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT mantraliifigenia uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT jalmbrantmaria uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT thummeenyau uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT diazgarciacesar uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT ghaemmaghamisadaf uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT wilkinsonstephen uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT quirogaisabel uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT friendpeter uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT yazbekjoseph uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability
AT smithjrichard uterinetransplantationusinglivingdonationacrosssectionalstudyassessingperceptionsacceptabilityandsuitability