Cargando…

Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))

Early detection of arterial hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is important. This study aims to compare the validity of Nexfin(TM) as beat-to-beat noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent oscillometric measurement of blood pressure during electiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bobet, Mathieu, Joachim, Jona, Gayat, Etienne, Bonnet, Agnès, Sievert, Kerstin, Barnichon, Carole, Fischler, Marc, Le Guen, Morgan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34087863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026129
_version_ 1783704441546866688
author Bobet, Mathieu
Joachim, Jona
Gayat, Etienne
Bonnet, Agnès
Sievert, Kerstin
Barnichon, Carole
Fischler, Marc
Le Guen, Morgan
author_facet Bobet, Mathieu
Joachim, Jona
Gayat, Etienne
Bonnet, Agnès
Sievert, Kerstin
Barnichon, Carole
Fischler, Marc
Le Guen, Morgan
author_sort Bobet, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description Early detection of arterial hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is important. This study aims to compare the validity of Nexfin(TM) as beat-to-beat noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent oscillometric measurement of blood pressure during elective cesarean delivery. This open prospective observational bicentric study was performed between January 2013 and December 2015. We simultaneously recorded arterial blood pressure with both techniques in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was a Bland–Altman analysis of systolic blood pressure measurement comparing Nexfin(TM) and a conventional method. The secondary outcomes were the time to detect the first relevant hypotensive episode and the comparison of both devices using a four-quadrant graph. One hundred and seventy-four parturients completed the study, and 2640 pairs of systolic blood pressure measurements were analyzed. Bias was -10 mmHg with upper and lower limits of agreement of -61 and +41 mmHg. In 73.9% of the cases, the two techniques provided the same information (normotension or hypotension), but the conventional method missed 20.8% of measurements, with Nexfin(TM) detecting 16.2% more hypotensive measurements. The median [25–75 percentiles] duration to detect the first hypotensive measurement was 331 [206–480] seconds for Nexfin(TM) and 440 [300–500] s for intermittent oscillometry (P < .001). The agreement between Nexfin(TM) and an intermittent method for the measurement of systolic blood pressure was not in an acceptable range during cesarean delivery, although Nexfin(TM) may detect hypotension earlier than the standard method. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01732133; November 22, 2012
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8183779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81837792021-06-07 Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) Bobet, Mathieu Joachim, Jona Gayat, Etienne Bonnet, Agnès Sievert, Kerstin Barnichon, Carole Fischler, Marc Le Guen, Morgan Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Early detection of arterial hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is important. This study aims to compare the validity of Nexfin(TM) as beat-to-beat noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent oscillometric measurement of blood pressure during elective cesarean delivery. This open prospective observational bicentric study was performed between January 2013 and December 2015. We simultaneously recorded arterial blood pressure with both techniques in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was a Bland–Altman analysis of systolic blood pressure measurement comparing Nexfin(TM) and a conventional method. The secondary outcomes were the time to detect the first relevant hypotensive episode and the comparison of both devices using a four-quadrant graph. One hundred and seventy-four parturients completed the study, and 2640 pairs of systolic blood pressure measurements were analyzed. Bias was -10 mmHg with upper and lower limits of agreement of -61 and +41 mmHg. In 73.9% of the cases, the two techniques provided the same information (normotension or hypotension), but the conventional method missed 20.8% of measurements, with Nexfin(TM) detecting 16.2% more hypotensive measurements. The median [25–75 percentiles] duration to detect the first hypotensive measurement was 331 [206–480] seconds for Nexfin(TM) and 440 [300–500] s for intermittent oscillometry (P < .001). The agreement between Nexfin(TM) and an intermittent method for the measurement of systolic blood pressure was not in an acceptable range during cesarean delivery, although Nexfin(TM) may detect hypotension earlier than the standard method. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01732133; November 22, 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8183779/ /pubmed/34087863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026129 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3300
Bobet, Mathieu
Joachim, Jona
Gayat, Etienne
Bonnet, Agnès
Sievert, Kerstin
Barnichon, Carole
Fischler, Marc
Le Guen, Morgan
Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
title Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
title_full Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
title_fullStr Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
title_full_unstemmed Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
title_short Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
title_sort blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (nexfin(tm))
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34087863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026129
work_keys_str_mv AT bobetmathieu bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT joachimjona bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT gayatetienne bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT bonnetagnes bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT sievertkerstin bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT barnichoncarole bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT fischlermarc bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm
AT leguenmorgan bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm