Cargando…
Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM))
Early detection of arterial hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is important. This study aims to compare the validity of Nexfin(TM) as beat-to-beat noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent oscillometric measurement of blood pressure during electiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34087863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026129 |
_version_ | 1783704441546866688 |
---|---|
author | Bobet, Mathieu Joachim, Jona Gayat, Etienne Bonnet, Agnès Sievert, Kerstin Barnichon, Carole Fischler, Marc Le Guen, Morgan |
author_facet | Bobet, Mathieu Joachim, Jona Gayat, Etienne Bonnet, Agnès Sievert, Kerstin Barnichon, Carole Fischler, Marc Le Guen, Morgan |
author_sort | Bobet, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early detection of arterial hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is important. This study aims to compare the validity of Nexfin(TM) as beat-to-beat noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent oscillometric measurement of blood pressure during elective cesarean delivery. This open prospective observational bicentric study was performed between January 2013 and December 2015. We simultaneously recorded arterial blood pressure with both techniques in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was a Bland–Altman analysis of systolic blood pressure measurement comparing Nexfin(TM) and a conventional method. The secondary outcomes were the time to detect the first relevant hypotensive episode and the comparison of both devices using a four-quadrant graph. One hundred and seventy-four parturients completed the study, and 2640 pairs of systolic blood pressure measurements were analyzed. Bias was -10 mmHg with upper and lower limits of agreement of -61 and +41 mmHg. In 73.9% of the cases, the two techniques provided the same information (normotension or hypotension), but the conventional method missed 20.8% of measurements, with Nexfin(TM) detecting 16.2% more hypotensive measurements. The median [25–75 percentiles] duration to detect the first hypotensive measurement was 331 [206–480] seconds for Nexfin(TM) and 440 [300–500] s for intermittent oscillometry (P < .001). The agreement between Nexfin(TM) and an intermittent method for the measurement of systolic blood pressure was not in an acceptable range during cesarean delivery, although Nexfin(TM) may detect hypotension earlier than the standard method. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01732133; November 22, 2012 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8183779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81837792021-06-07 Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) Bobet, Mathieu Joachim, Jona Gayat, Etienne Bonnet, Agnès Sievert, Kerstin Barnichon, Carole Fischler, Marc Le Guen, Morgan Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Early detection of arterial hypotension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is important. This study aims to compare the validity of Nexfin(TM) as beat-to-beat noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent oscillometric measurement of blood pressure during elective cesarean delivery. This open prospective observational bicentric study was performed between January 2013 and December 2015. We simultaneously recorded arterial blood pressure with both techniques in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was a Bland–Altman analysis of systolic blood pressure measurement comparing Nexfin(TM) and a conventional method. The secondary outcomes were the time to detect the first relevant hypotensive episode and the comparison of both devices using a four-quadrant graph. One hundred and seventy-four parturients completed the study, and 2640 pairs of systolic blood pressure measurements were analyzed. Bias was -10 mmHg with upper and lower limits of agreement of -61 and +41 mmHg. In 73.9% of the cases, the two techniques provided the same information (normotension or hypotension), but the conventional method missed 20.8% of measurements, with Nexfin(TM) detecting 16.2% more hypotensive measurements. The median [25–75 percentiles] duration to detect the first hypotensive measurement was 331 [206–480] seconds for Nexfin(TM) and 440 [300–500] s for intermittent oscillometry (P < .001). The agreement between Nexfin(TM) and an intermittent method for the measurement of systolic blood pressure was not in an acceptable range during cesarean delivery, although Nexfin(TM) may detect hypotension earlier than the standard method. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01732133; November 22, 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8183779/ /pubmed/34087863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026129 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 3300 Bobet, Mathieu Joachim, Jona Gayat, Etienne Bonnet, Agnès Sievert, Kerstin Barnichon, Carole Fischler, Marc Le Guen, Morgan Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) |
title | Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) |
title_full | Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) |
title_fullStr | Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) |
title_short | Blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: Evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (Nexfin(TM)) |
title_sort | blood pressure measurement during cesarean delivery: evaluation of a beat-to-beat noninvasive device (nexfin(tm)) |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34087863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bobetmathieu bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT joachimjona bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT gayatetienne bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT bonnetagnes bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT sievertkerstin bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT barnichoncarole bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT fischlermarc bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm AT leguenmorgan bloodpressuremeasurementduringcesareandeliveryevaluationofabeattobeatnoninvasivedevicenexfintm |