Cargando…

A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by invasive dP/dt

BACKGROUND: No periprocedural metric has demonstrated improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes in a multicenter setting. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if left ventricular (LV) lead placement targeted to the coronary sinus (CS) branch generating the best acute hemodynamic respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohal, Manav, Hamid, Shoaib, Perego, Giovanni, Della Bella, Paolo, Adhya, Shaumik, Paisey, John, Betts, Tim, Kamdar, Ravi, Lambiase, Pier, Leyva, Francisco, McComb, Janet M., Behar, Jonathan, Jackson, Thomas, Claridge, Simon, Mehta, Vishal, Elliott, Mark, Niederer, Steven, Razavi, Reza, Rinaldi, C. Aldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.01.005
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: No periprocedural metric has demonstrated improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes in a multicenter setting. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if left ventricular (LV) lead placement targeted to the coronary sinus (CS) branch generating the best acute hemodynamic response (AHR) results in improved outcomes at 6 months. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized to guided CRT or conventional CRT. Patients in the guided arm had LV dP/dt(max) measured during biventricular (BIV) pacing. Target CS branches were identified and the final LV lead position was the branch with the best AHR and acceptable threshold values. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) of ≥15% at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients were recruited across 12 centers. Mean age was 70.8 ± 10.9 years and 54% had ischemic etiology. Seventy-three percent of patients in the guided arm demonstrated a reduction in LVESV of ≥15% at 6 months vs 60% in the conventional arm (P = .02). Patients with AHR ≥ 10% were more likely to demonstrate a reduction of ESV ≥ 15% (84% of patients with an AHR ≥10% vs 28% with an AHR <10%; P < 0.001). Procedure duration and fluoroscopy times were longer in the pressure wire–guided arm (104 ± 39 minutes vs 142 ± 39 minutes; P < .001 and 20 ±16 minutes vs 28 ± 15 minutes; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: AHR determined by invasively measuring LV dP/dt(max) during BIV pacing predicts reverse remodeling 6 months after CRT. Patients in whom LV dP/dt(max) was used to guide LV lead placement demonstrated better rates of reverse remodeling.