Cargando…

Utilization and programming of an automatic MRI recognition feature for cardiac rhythm management devices

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)—ie, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices—have recently been designed to allow for patients to safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when specific programming is implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullane, Steven, Michaelis, Kyle, Henrikson, Charles, Iwai, Sei, Miller, Crystal, Harrell, Camden, Hayes, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.03.002
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)—ie, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices—have recently been designed to allow for patients to safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when specific programming is implemented. MRI AutoDetect is a feature that automatically switches CIED’s programming into and out of an MR safe mode when exposed to an MRI environment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to analyze de-identified daily remote transmission data to characterize the utilization of the MRI AutoDetect feature. METHODS: Home Monitoring transmission data collected from MRI AutoDetect–capable devices were retrospectively analyzed to determine the workflow and usage in patients experiencing an MRI using the MRI AutoDetect feature. RESULTS: Among 48,756 capable systems, 2197 devices underwent an MRI using the MRI AutoDetect feature. In these 2197 devices, the MRI AutoDetect feature was used a total of 2806 times with an average MRI exposure of 40.83 minutes. The majority (88.9%) of MRI exposures occurred on the same day as the MRI AutoDetect programming. A same day post-MRI exposure follow-up device interrogation was performed 8.6% of the time. A device-related complaint occurred within 30 days of the MRI exposure in 0.25% of MRI exposures using MRI AutoDetect but with no adverse clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: As a result of automation in device programming, the MRI AutoDetect feature eliminated post-MRI device reprogramming in 91.4% of MRI exposures and, while less frequent, allowed for pre-MRI interrogations prior to the day of the MRI exposure—reducing resource utilization and creating workflow flexibility.