Cargando…

Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety

BACKGROUND: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noten, Anna Maria Elisabeth, Géczy, Tamas, Yap, Sing-Chien, Kis, Zsuzsanna, Szili-Torok, Tamas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.04.003
_version_ 1783704490663215104
author Noten, Anna Maria Elisabeth
Géczy, Tamas
Yap, Sing-Chien
Kis, Zsuzsanna
Szili-Torok, Tamas
author_facet Noten, Anna Maria Elisabeth
Géczy, Tamas
Yap, Sing-Chien
Kis, Zsuzsanna
Szili-Torok, Tamas
author_sort Noten, Anna Maria Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel feature designed for RMN that measures the quality of catheter–tissue contact. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the first clinical experience with this feature and to test its effect on procedural parameters and interference with other ablation equipment during CA procedures as well as its safety. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, 2-phase study investigating ECM use during complex RMN procedures in 30 patients. Impact of ECM on procedural parameters was evaluated in the feasibility phase (FP), and its interference with other equipment was tested in the interference phase (IP) using pacing maneuvers at 3 randomly selected right atrial sites. Intracardiac electrograms were evaluated for disturbances by 2 independent electrophysiologists. RESULTS: For FP, mean procedural time was 162 ± 66 minutes, fluoroscopy time 21 ± 9 minutes, and ablation time 34 ± 21 minutes. For IP, no significant differences in pacing capture or thresholds were found (ECM– vs ECM+: site 1: 2.05 vs 2.21 mA; P = .320; site 2: 2.15 vs 2.12 mA; P = .873; site 3: 2.51 vs 2.50 mA; P = .976). Electrogram disturbances did not significantly differ between ECM– and ECM+. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The ECM is a novel catheter–tissue contact technology designed for RMN-guided CA. Our study suggests that this feature is feasible and does not interfere with other electrophysiology equipment while maintaining an excellent safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8183953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81839532021-06-09 Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety Noten, Anna Maria Elisabeth Géczy, Tamas Yap, Sing-Chien Kis, Zsuzsanna Szili-Torok, Tamas Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: The quality of catheter–tissue contact is one of the most important determinants of catheter ablation (CA) success. The absence of catheter–tissue contact feedback has been regarded a major limitation of remote magnetic navigation (RMN)–guided CA. The e-Contact module (ECM) is a novel feature designed for RMN that measures the quality of catheter–tissue contact. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the first clinical experience with this feature and to test its effect on procedural parameters and interference with other ablation equipment during CA procedures as well as its safety. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, 2-phase study investigating ECM use during complex RMN procedures in 30 patients. Impact of ECM on procedural parameters was evaluated in the feasibility phase (FP), and its interference with other equipment was tested in the interference phase (IP) using pacing maneuvers at 3 randomly selected right atrial sites. Intracardiac electrograms were evaluated for disturbances by 2 independent electrophysiologists. RESULTS: For FP, mean procedural time was 162 ± 66 minutes, fluoroscopy time 21 ± 9 minutes, and ablation time 34 ± 21 minutes. For IP, no significant differences in pacing capture or thresholds were found (ECM– vs ECM+: site 1: 2.05 vs 2.21 mA; P = .320; site 2: 2.15 vs 2.12 mA; P = .873; site 3: 2.51 vs 2.50 mA; P = .976). Electrogram disturbances did not significantly differ between ECM– and ECM+. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The ECM is a novel catheter–tissue contact technology designed for RMN-guided CA. Our study suggests that this feature is feasible and does not interfere with other electrophysiology equipment while maintaining an excellent safety profile. Elsevier 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8183953/ /pubmed/34113864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.04.003 Text en © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Noten, Anna Maria Elisabeth
Géczy, Tamas
Yap, Sing-Chien
Kis, Zsuzsanna
Szili-Torok, Tamas
Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety
title Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety
title_full Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety
title_fullStr Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety
title_full_unstemmed Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety
title_short Introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety
title_sort introducing a novel catheter–tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: utility, feasibility, and safety
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.04.003
work_keys_str_mv AT notenannamariaelisabeth introducinganovelcathetertissuecontactfeedbackfeatureinroboticnavigatedcatheterablationutilityfeasibilityandsafety
AT geczytamas introducinganovelcathetertissuecontactfeedbackfeatureinroboticnavigatedcatheterablationutilityfeasibilityandsafety
AT yapsingchien introducinganovelcathetertissuecontactfeedbackfeatureinroboticnavigatedcatheterablationutilityfeasibilityandsafety
AT kiszsuzsanna introducinganovelcathetertissuecontactfeedbackfeatureinroboticnavigatedcatheterablationutilityfeasibilityandsafety
AT szilitoroktamas introducinganovelcathetertissuecontactfeedbackfeatureinroboticnavigatedcatheterablationutilityfeasibilityandsafety