Cargando…

Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study

BACKGROUND: Rate control medications are foundational in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no guidelines for adjusting these medications prior to elective direct-current cardioversion (DCCV). OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a preprocedural medication adjustment proto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Nelson, MacGillivray, Jenny, Andrade, Jason G., Krahn, Andrew D., Hawkins, Nathaniel M., Laksman, Zachary, Deyell, Marc W., Chakrabarti, Shanta, Yeung-Lai-Wah, John A., Bennett, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.01.002
_version_ 1783704492370296832
author Lu, Nelson
MacGillivray, Jenny
Andrade, Jason G.
Krahn, Andrew D.
Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
Laksman, Zachary
Deyell, Marc W.
Chakrabarti, Shanta
Yeung-Lai-Wah, John A.
Bennett, Matthew T.
author_facet Lu, Nelson
MacGillivray, Jenny
Andrade, Jason G.
Krahn, Andrew D.
Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
Laksman, Zachary
Deyell, Marc W.
Chakrabarti, Shanta
Yeung-Lai-Wah, John A.
Bennett, Matthew T.
author_sort Lu, Nelson
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rate control medications are foundational in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no guidelines for adjusting these medications prior to elective direct-current cardioversion (DCCV). OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a preprocedural medication adjustment protocol that maintains peri-DCCV rate control and minimizes risk of postconversion bradycardia, pauses, need for pacing, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Consecutive patients with persistent AF awaiting elective DCCV across 2 hospitals were screened for inclusion into derivation, validation, and control cohorts. In the derivation cohort, each patient taking an atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocker had medications adjusted based on heart rate (HR) 2 days before DCCV, and the magnitude of dose adjustment was compared with peri-DCCV HR. The adjustment protocol that achieved the highest percentage of optimal peri-DCCV rate control was tested prospectively in the validation cohort and compared to a standard-of-care control group. RESULTS: The optimal protocol from the derivation cohort (n = 71), based on the 2-day pre-DCCV HR, was to (1) CONTINUE AV nodal blocker for HR ≥ 100 beats per minute (bpm), (2) reduce dose by ONE increment when 80–99 bpm, (3) reduce dose by TWO increments when 60–79 bpm, and (4) HOLD when <60 bpm. In the prospective validation cohort (n = 106), this protocol improved peri-DCCV rate control (82% vs 62%, P < .001) compared to current standard of care (n = 107). There were no conversion pauses ≥5 seconds, need for pacing, or CPR post-DCCV. CONCLUSION: This simple preprocedural medication adjustment protocol provides an effective strategy of optimizing peri-DCCV rate control in patients with AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8183961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81839612021-06-09 Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study Lu, Nelson MacGillivray, Jenny Andrade, Jason G. Krahn, Andrew D. Hawkins, Nathaniel M. Laksman, Zachary Deyell, Marc W. Chakrabarti, Shanta Yeung-Lai-Wah, John A. Bennett, Matthew T. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Rate control medications are foundational in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no guidelines for adjusting these medications prior to elective direct-current cardioversion (DCCV). OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a preprocedural medication adjustment protocol that maintains peri-DCCV rate control and minimizes risk of postconversion bradycardia, pauses, need for pacing, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: Consecutive patients with persistent AF awaiting elective DCCV across 2 hospitals were screened for inclusion into derivation, validation, and control cohorts. In the derivation cohort, each patient taking an atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocker had medications adjusted based on heart rate (HR) 2 days before DCCV, and the magnitude of dose adjustment was compared with peri-DCCV HR. The adjustment protocol that achieved the highest percentage of optimal peri-DCCV rate control was tested prospectively in the validation cohort and compared to a standard-of-care control group. RESULTS: The optimal protocol from the derivation cohort (n = 71), based on the 2-day pre-DCCV HR, was to (1) CONTINUE AV nodal blocker for HR ≥ 100 beats per minute (bpm), (2) reduce dose by ONE increment when 80–99 bpm, (3) reduce dose by TWO increments when 60–79 bpm, and (4) HOLD when <60 bpm. In the prospective validation cohort (n = 106), this protocol improved peri-DCCV rate control (82% vs 62%, P < .001) compared to current standard of care (n = 107). There were no conversion pauses ≥5 seconds, need for pacing, or CPR post-DCCV. CONCLUSION: This simple preprocedural medication adjustment protocol provides an effective strategy of optimizing peri-DCCV rate control in patients with AF. Elsevier 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8183961/ /pubmed/34113904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.01.002 Text en © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Lu, Nelson
MacGillivray, Jenny
Andrade, Jason G.
Krahn, Andrew D.
Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
Laksman, Zachary
Deyell, Marc W.
Chakrabarti, Shanta
Yeung-Lai-Wah, John A.
Bennett, Matthew T.
Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study
title Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study
title_full Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study
title_short Effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: A derivation and validation cohort study
title_sort effectiveness of a simple medication adjustment protocol for optimizing peri-cardioversion rate control: a derivation and validation cohort study
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT lunelson effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT macgillivrayjenny effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT andradejasong effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT krahnandrewd effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT hawkinsnathanielm effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT laksmanzachary effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT deyellmarcw effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT chakrabartishanta effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT yeunglaiwahjohna effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy
AT bennettmatthewt effectivenessofasimplemedicationadjustmentprotocolforoptimizingpericardioversionratecontroladerivationandvalidationcohortstudy