Cargando…

Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique

BACKGROUND: Innominate vein stenosis and venous tortuosity are common findings during cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades or replacements and present a challenge to the implanting physician. Various techniques have been described to facilitate lead placement, including serial dilation, ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arkles, Jeffrey S., Suryanarayana, Prakash Goutham, Sadek, Mouhannad, Cooper, Joshua M., Frankel, David S., Garcia, Fermin C., Giri, Jay, Schaller, Robert D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.01.001
_version_ 1783704492830621696
author Arkles, Jeffrey S.
Suryanarayana, Prakash Goutham
Sadek, Mouhannad
Cooper, Joshua M.
Frankel, David S.
Garcia, Fermin C.
Giri, Jay
Schaller, Robert D.
author_facet Arkles, Jeffrey S.
Suryanarayana, Prakash Goutham
Sadek, Mouhannad
Cooper, Joshua M.
Frankel, David S.
Garcia, Fermin C.
Giri, Jay
Schaller, Robert D.
author_sort Arkles, Jeffrey S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Innominate vein stenosis and venous tortuosity are common findings during cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades or replacements and present a challenge to the implanting physician. Various techniques have been described to facilitate lead placement, including serial dilation, balloon venoplasty, and percutaneous access medial to the stenosis, each with its own benefits and risks. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the wire countertraction (“body flossing”) technique to facilitate sheath placement through tortuous and stenotic vessels. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device procedures requiring the body flossing technique due to inability to place vascular sheaths over the wire through stenoses or tortuosity were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, procedural equipment, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Simultaneous countertraction was successful in all attempted cases, including 8 patients with stenoses and 2 with tortuosity. In 2 of the stenosis cases, venoplasty had previously failed. No complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous countertraction (body flossing) is an effective tool to overcome venous stenosis and tortuosity that are amenable to wire advancement but not to vascular sheaths. It seems to be a safe and effective alternative to other techniques used in these scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8183965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81839652021-06-09 Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique Arkles, Jeffrey S. Suryanarayana, Prakash Goutham Sadek, Mouhannad Cooper, Joshua M. Frankel, David S. Garcia, Fermin C. Giri, Jay Schaller, Robert D. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Innominate vein stenosis and venous tortuosity are common findings during cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades or replacements and present a challenge to the implanting physician. Various techniques have been described to facilitate lead placement, including serial dilation, balloon venoplasty, and percutaneous access medial to the stenosis, each with its own benefits and risks. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the wire countertraction (“body flossing”) technique to facilitate sheath placement through tortuous and stenotic vessels. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device procedures requiring the body flossing technique due to inability to place vascular sheaths over the wire through stenoses or tortuosity were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, procedural equipment, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Simultaneous countertraction was successful in all attempted cases, including 8 patients with stenoses and 2 with tortuosity. In 2 of the stenosis cases, venoplasty had previously failed. No complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous countertraction (body flossing) is an effective tool to overcome venous stenosis and tortuosity that are amenable to wire advancement but not to vascular sheaths. It seems to be a safe and effective alternative to other techniques used in these scenarios. Elsevier 2020-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8183965/ /pubmed/34113856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.01.001 Text en © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Arkles, Jeffrey S.
Suryanarayana, Prakash Goutham
Sadek, Mouhannad
Cooper, Joshua M.
Frankel, David S.
Garcia, Fermin C.
Giri, Jay
Schaller, Robert D.
Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique
title Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique
title_full Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique
title_fullStr Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique
title_full_unstemmed Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique
title_short Wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: The “body flossing” technique
title_sort wire countertraction for sheath placement through stenotic and tortuous veins: the “body flossing” technique
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8183965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT arklesjeffreys wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT suryanarayanaprakashgoutham wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT sadekmouhannad wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT cooperjoshuam wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT frankeldavids wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT garciaferminc wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT girijay wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique
AT schallerrobertd wirecountertractionforsheathplacementthroughstenoticandtortuousveinsthebodyflossingtechnique