Cargando…

Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment is a suitable way to differentiate between high-risk individuals requiring intervention and risk modification, and those at low risk. However, concerns have been raised when adopting a CVD-risk prediction algorithm for HIV-infected patients in su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Msoka, Titus, Rogath, Josephine, Van Guilder, Gary, Kapanda, Gibson, Smulders, Yvo, Tutu van Furth, Marceline, Bartlett, John, van Agtmael, Michiel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113177
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S304982
_version_ 1783704530434654208
author Msoka, Titus
Rogath, Josephine
Van Guilder, Gary
Kapanda, Gibson
Smulders, Yvo
Tutu van Furth, Marceline
Bartlett, John
van Agtmael, Michiel
author_facet Msoka, Titus
Rogath, Josephine
Van Guilder, Gary
Kapanda, Gibson
Smulders, Yvo
Tutu van Furth, Marceline
Bartlett, John
van Agtmael, Michiel
author_sort Msoka, Titus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment is a suitable way to differentiate between high-risk individuals requiring intervention and risk modification, and those at low risk. However, concerns have been raised when adopting a CVD-risk prediction algorithm for HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared cardiovascular risk profiles between HIV-infected (with and without antiretroviral therapy (ART)) and HIV-uninfected adults as predicted by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ASCVD) and the Framingham cardiovascular risk score (FRS) algorithms and assessed the concordance of the algorithms in predicting 10-year CVD risk separately in HIV-infected and uninfected groups in a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Tanzania. A cross-sectional hospital-based study including 40 HIV-infected ART-naive, 64 HIV-infected on ART, and 50 HIV-uninfected adults was conducted. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were determined by standard investigations. The primary outcome was the absolute 10-year CVD risk score based on the two algorithms. RESULTS: Compared to HIV-uninfected, HIV-infected adults were classified at a higher 10-year CVD risk. ASCVD algorithms predicted a higher proportion of high-risk individuals compared to FRS in both HIV-infected and uninfected groups. The concordance between ASCVD and FRS-lipid algorithms was reasonable for both HIV-infected and uninfected groups though relatively higher in the HIV-uninfected group. CONCLUSION: HIV-infected individuals have a higher 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to HIV-uninfected persons. The concordance between ASCVD and FRS-lipid algorithms is reasonable in both HIV-uninfected and infected persons in Tanzania. Development of an HIV-specific algorithm is needed to accurately predict CVD risk in this population at high-risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81841492021-06-09 Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania Msoka, Titus Rogath, Josephine Van Guilder, Gary Kapanda, Gibson Smulders, Yvo Tutu van Furth, Marceline Bartlett, John van Agtmael, Michiel HIV AIDS (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment is a suitable way to differentiate between high-risk individuals requiring intervention and risk modification, and those at low risk. However, concerns have been raised when adopting a CVD-risk prediction algorithm for HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared cardiovascular risk profiles between HIV-infected (with and without antiretroviral therapy (ART)) and HIV-uninfected adults as predicted by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ASCVD) and the Framingham cardiovascular risk score (FRS) algorithms and assessed the concordance of the algorithms in predicting 10-year CVD risk separately in HIV-infected and uninfected groups in a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Tanzania. A cross-sectional hospital-based study including 40 HIV-infected ART-naive, 64 HIV-infected on ART, and 50 HIV-uninfected adults was conducted. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were determined by standard investigations. The primary outcome was the absolute 10-year CVD risk score based on the two algorithms. RESULTS: Compared to HIV-uninfected, HIV-infected adults were classified at a higher 10-year CVD risk. ASCVD algorithms predicted a higher proportion of high-risk individuals compared to FRS in both HIV-infected and uninfected groups. The concordance between ASCVD and FRS-lipid algorithms was reasonable for both HIV-infected and uninfected groups though relatively higher in the HIV-uninfected group. CONCLUSION: HIV-infected individuals have a higher 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to HIV-uninfected persons. The concordance between ASCVD and FRS-lipid algorithms is reasonable in both HIV-uninfected and infected persons in Tanzania. Development of an HIV-specific algorithm is needed to accurately predict CVD risk in this population at high-risk. Dove 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8184149/ /pubmed/34113177 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S304982 Text en © 2021 Msoka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Msoka, Titus
Rogath, Josephine
Van Guilder, Gary
Kapanda, Gibson
Smulders, Yvo
Tutu van Furth, Marceline
Bartlett, John
van Agtmael, Michiel
Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania
title Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania
title_full Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania
title_fullStr Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania
title_short Comparison of Predicted Cardiovascular Risk Profiles by Different CVD Risk-Scoring Algorithms between HIV-1-Infected and Uninfected Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tanzania
title_sort comparison of predicted cardiovascular risk profiles by different cvd risk-scoring algorithms between hiv-1-infected and uninfected adults: a cross-sectional study in tanzania
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113177
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S304982
work_keys_str_mv AT msokatitus comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT rogathjosephine comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT vanguildergary comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT kapandagibson comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT smuldersyvo comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT tutuvanfurthmarceline comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT bartlettjohn comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania
AT vanagtmaelmichiel comparisonofpredictedcardiovascularriskprofilesbydifferentcvdriskscoringalgorithmsbetweenhiv1infectedanduninfectedadultsacrosssectionalstudyintanzania