Cargando…

Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Objectives  To evaluate the surface roughness and gloss of three nanohybrid resin composites after polishing with three different polishing systems. Materials and Methods  A total number of 112 disc specimens (10 × 3 mm) were prepared from nanohybrid—Empress Direct (ID), Grandio (GR), Filtek Z350 (Z...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Hanan A. N., Elkholany, Naglaa Rizk, Hamama, Hamdi H., EL-Sharkawy, Fatma M., Mahmoud, Salah H., Comisi, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718477
_version_ 1783704558567948288
author Soliman, Hanan A. N.
Elkholany, Naglaa Rizk
Hamama, Hamdi H.
EL-Sharkawy, Fatma M.
Mahmoud, Salah H.
Comisi, John C.
author_facet Soliman, Hanan A. N.
Elkholany, Naglaa Rizk
Hamama, Hamdi H.
EL-Sharkawy, Fatma M.
Mahmoud, Salah H.
Comisi, John C.
author_sort Soliman, Hanan A. N.
collection PubMed
description Objectives  To evaluate the surface roughness and gloss of three nanohybrid resin composites after polishing with three different polishing systems. Materials and Methods  A total number of 112 disc specimens (10 × 3 mm) were prepared from nanohybrid—Empress Direct (ID), Grandio (GR), Filtek Z350 (Z350) and a microhybrid resin composite restorative materials—Filtek Z250 (Z250). Following 24-hour storage in 37°C distilled water, each composite group ( n = 28) was assigned into four groups ( n = 7) according to finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip, Optrapol, Politip, and Sof-Lex (SL). The surface roughness (Ra, mm) was measured by a novel three-dimensional method using an image analysis software attached to an environmental scanning electron microscope. A glossometer was used to measure the surface gloss. Results Statistical analysis used was ANOVA test. Two-way Anova test revealed that the “type of composite” and “F/P techniques” had a significant effect on both surface roughness and gloss of the tested resin composite materials ( p < 0.05). Tukey’s post hoc test showed that ID, GR, and Z350 revealed lower surface roughness and higher surface gloss than Z250 within the same polishing system ( p < 0.05). Sof-Lex polishing discs produced the lowest surface roughness and highest surface gloss values compared with Optrapol and Politip ( p < 0.05). Conclusion  The tested F/P systems provided comparable surface roughness and gloss for nanohybrid composites. The Sof-Lex system provided the best surface roughness and gloss for nanohybrid composites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81842732021-06-10 Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites Soliman, Hanan A. N. Elkholany, Naglaa Rizk Hamama, Hamdi H. EL-Sharkawy, Fatma M. Mahmoud, Salah H. Comisi, John C. Eur J Dent Objectives  To evaluate the surface roughness and gloss of three nanohybrid resin composites after polishing with three different polishing systems. Materials and Methods  A total number of 112 disc specimens (10 × 3 mm) were prepared from nanohybrid—Empress Direct (ID), Grandio (GR), Filtek Z350 (Z350) and a microhybrid resin composite restorative materials—Filtek Z250 (Z250). Following 24-hour storage in 37°C distilled water, each composite group ( n = 28) was assigned into four groups ( n = 7) according to finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip, Optrapol, Politip, and Sof-Lex (SL). The surface roughness (Ra, mm) was measured by a novel three-dimensional method using an image analysis software attached to an environmental scanning electron microscope. A glossometer was used to measure the surface gloss. Results Statistical analysis used was ANOVA test. Two-way Anova test revealed that the “type of composite” and “F/P techniques” had a significant effect on both surface roughness and gloss of the tested resin composite materials ( p < 0.05). Tukey’s post hoc test showed that ID, GR, and Z350 revealed lower surface roughness and higher surface gloss than Z250 within the same polishing system ( p < 0.05). Sof-Lex polishing discs produced the lowest surface roughness and highest surface gloss values compared with Optrapol and Politip ( p < 0.05). Conclusion  The tested F/P systems provided comparable surface roughness and gloss for nanohybrid composites. The Sof-Lex system provided the best surface roughness and gloss for nanohybrid composites. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2021-05 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8184273/ /pubmed/33111284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718477 Text en European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Soliman, Hanan A. N.
Elkholany, Naglaa Rizk
Hamama, Hamdi H.
EL-Sharkawy, Fatma M.
Mahmoud, Salah H.
Comisi, John C.
Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites
title Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites
title_full Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites
title_fullStr Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites
title_short Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites
title_sort effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness and gloss of novel nanohybrid resin composites
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718477
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanhananan effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessandglossofnovelnanohybridresincomposites
AT elkholanynaglaarizk effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessandglossofnovelnanohybridresincomposites
AT hamamahamdih effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessandglossofnovelnanohybridresincomposites
AT elsharkawyfatmam effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessandglossofnovelnanohybridresincomposites
AT mahmoudsalahh effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessandglossofnovelnanohybridresincomposites
AT comisijohnc effectofdifferentpolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessandglossofnovelnanohybridresincomposites