Cargando…

Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors

BACKGROUND: A Mobile Safety Center (MSC) provides safety resources to families to prevent pediatric injury. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of an MSC on home safety behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study with 50 parents and guardians recruited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furman, Leah, Strotmeyer, Stephen, Vitale, Christine, Gaines, Barbara A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4
_version_ 1783704576191365120
author Furman, Leah
Strotmeyer, Stephen
Vitale, Christine
Gaines, Barbara A.
author_facet Furman, Leah
Strotmeyer, Stephen
Vitale, Christine
Gaines, Barbara A.
author_sort Furman, Leah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Mobile Safety Center (MSC) provides safety resources to families to prevent pediatric injury. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of an MSC on home safety behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study with 50 parents and guardians recruited at community events attended by an MSC. Participants completed a pre-test assessing demographics and home safety behaviors prior to participating in the MSC’s home safety educational program. We conducted follow-up with participants 4 weeks (follow-up 1) and 6 months (follow-up 2) after their visit to the MSC to reassess home safety behaviors. We used descriptive statistics in addition to Friedman, Wilcoxon sum-rank, and Fisher’s exact testing to analyze respondent demographics and changes in home safety practices. Friedman and Wilcoxon sum-rank testing was performed only for participants who completed all surveys. RESULTS: Of our 50 participants, 29 (58%) completed follow-up 1, 30 (60%) completed follow-up 2, and 26 (52%) completed both. Participants were more likely to have a fire-escape plan at follow-up 1 than on the pre-test (p = 0.014). They were also more likely to have the Poison Control Hotline number accessible in their cellphone or near a home phone at follow-up 1 compared to the pre-test (p = 0.002) and follow-up 2 compared to the pre-test (p < 0.001). Families with at least one household member who smoked or used e-cigarettes at any point during the study (n = 16 for the total population, n = 9 for those who completed both surveys) were less likely to have more than two smoke detectors installed at home during the pre-test (p = 0.049). However, this significantly changed across timepoints (p = 0.018), and while 44.4% reported more than two detectors during the pre-test, 88.9% reported this at both follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Home safety education through an MSC positively changed some reported safety behaviors and maintained these changes at long-term follow-up. By encouraging the adoption of better home safety practices, education at an MSC may decrease pediatric injury rates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81843522021-06-08 Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors Furman, Leah Strotmeyer, Stephen Vitale, Christine Gaines, Barbara A. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: A Mobile Safety Center (MSC) provides safety resources to families to prevent pediatric injury. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of an MSC on home safety behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study with 50 parents and guardians recruited at community events attended by an MSC. Participants completed a pre-test assessing demographics and home safety behaviors prior to participating in the MSC’s home safety educational program. We conducted follow-up with participants 4 weeks (follow-up 1) and 6 months (follow-up 2) after their visit to the MSC to reassess home safety behaviors. We used descriptive statistics in addition to Friedman, Wilcoxon sum-rank, and Fisher’s exact testing to analyze respondent demographics and changes in home safety practices. Friedman and Wilcoxon sum-rank testing was performed only for participants who completed all surveys. RESULTS: Of our 50 participants, 29 (58%) completed follow-up 1, 30 (60%) completed follow-up 2, and 26 (52%) completed both. Participants were more likely to have a fire-escape plan at follow-up 1 than on the pre-test (p = 0.014). They were also more likely to have the Poison Control Hotline number accessible in their cellphone or near a home phone at follow-up 1 compared to the pre-test (p = 0.002) and follow-up 2 compared to the pre-test (p < 0.001). Families with at least one household member who smoked or used e-cigarettes at any point during the study (n = 16 for the total population, n = 9 for those who completed both surveys) were less likely to have more than two smoke detectors installed at home during the pre-test (p = 0.049). However, this significantly changed across timepoints (p = 0.018), and while 44.4% reported more than two detectors during the pre-test, 88.9% reported this at both follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Home safety education through an MSC positively changed some reported safety behaviors and maintained these changes at long-term follow-up. By encouraging the adoption of better home safety practices, education at an MSC may decrease pediatric injury rates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4. BioMed Central 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8184352/ /pubmed/34098915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Furman, Leah
Strotmeyer, Stephen
Vitale, Christine
Gaines, Barbara A.
Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_full Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_fullStr Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_short Evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
title_sort evaluation of a mobile safety center’s impact on pediatric home safety behaviors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11073-4
work_keys_str_mv AT furmanleah evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
AT strotmeyerstephen evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
AT vitalechristine evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors
AT gainesbarbaraa evaluationofamobilesafetycentersimpactonpediatrichomesafetybehaviors