Cargando…
Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival
BACKGROUND: One frequent consequence of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) is weight loss (WL). HNC patients reportedly lose about 9% of their weight during treatment, regardless of pre-treatment WL and nutritional support. We investigated whether high WL during RT has an associat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164548 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4969 |
_version_ | 1783704585165078528 |
---|---|
author | Han, Hye Ri Hermann, Gregory M. Ma, Sung Jun Iovoli, Austin J. Wooten, Kimberly E. Arshad, Hassan Gupta, Vishal McSpadden, Ryan P. Kuriakose, Moni A. Markiewicz, Michael R. Chan, Jon M. Platek, Mary E. Ray, Andrew D. Gu, Fangyi Hicks, Wesley L. Singh, Anurag K. |
author_facet | Han, Hye Ri Hermann, Gregory M. Ma, Sung Jun Iovoli, Austin J. Wooten, Kimberly E. Arshad, Hassan Gupta, Vishal McSpadden, Ryan P. Kuriakose, Moni A. Markiewicz, Michael R. Chan, Jon M. Platek, Mary E. Ray, Andrew D. Gu, Fangyi Hicks, Wesley L. Singh, Anurag K. |
author_sort | Han, Hye Ri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One frequent consequence of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) is weight loss (WL). HNC patients reportedly lose about 9% of their weight during treatment, regardless of pre-treatment WL and nutritional support. We investigated whether high WL during RT has an association with overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed weight during RT in HNC patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017. High WL was defined as greater than or equal to the median WL. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for WL during RT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate survival outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain balanced matched-pairs and compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 843 patients received either definitive (71%) or post-operative (29%) RT. Median follow-up was 53.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 35.7–88.9]. Median WL was 5.8% (IQR 0.24–10.6) from baseline weight. Patients with high WL had better OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61–0.93, P=0.01] and CSS (HR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55–0.93, P=0.01). 258 matched-pairs were analyzed. Median follow-up was 54.8 months (IQR 35.8–90.4). Median OS was 39.2 months (IQR 21.4–75.7) for high WL versus 36.7 months (IQR 14.6–61.7) for low WL cohorts (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Different from previous reports, this study shows that patients with less WL have worse OS. WL during RT may not be a reliable marker for worse prognosis. A better way to evaluate malnutrition in patients undergoing RT is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8184423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81844232021-06-22 Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival Han, Hye Ri Hermann, Gregory M. Ma, Sung Jun Iovoli, Austin J. Wooten, Kimberly E. Arshad, Hassan Gupta, Vishal McSpadden, Ryan P. Kuriakose, Moni A. Markiewicz, Michael R. Chan, Jon M. Platek, Mary E. Ray, Andrew D. Gu, Fangyi Hicks, Wesley L. Singh, Anurag K. Ann Transl Med Original Article on Head and Neck Cancers - Disease Biology, Diagnostics, Prevention and Management BACKGROUND: One frequent consequence of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) is weight loss (WL). HNC patients reportedly lose about 9% of their weight during treatment, regardless of pre-treatment WL and nutritional support. We investigated whether high WL during RT has an association with overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed weight during RT in HNC patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017. High WL was defined as greater than or equal to the median WL. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for WL during RT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate survival outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain balanced matched-pairs and compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 843 patients received either definitive (71%) or post-operative (29%) RT. Median follow-up was 53.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 35.7–88.9]. Median WL was 5.8% (IQR 0.24–10.6) from baseline weight. Patients with high WL had better OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61–0.93, P=0.01] and CSS (HR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55–0.93, P=0.01). 258 matched-pairs were analyzed. Median follow-up was 54.8 months (IQR 35.8–90.4). Median OS was 39.2 months (IQR 21.4–75.7) for high WL versus 36.7 months (IQR 14.6–61.7) for low WL cohorts (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Different from previous reports, this study shows that patients with less WL have worse OS. WL during RT may not be a reliable marker for worse prognosis. A better way to evaluate malnutrition in patients undergoing RT is warranted. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8184423/ /pubmed/34164548 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4969 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article on Head and Neck Cancers - Disease Biology, Diagnostics, Prevention and Management Han, Hye Ri Hermann, Gregory M. Ma, Sung Jun Iovoli, Austin J. Wooten, Kimberly E. Arshad, Hassan Gupta, Vishal McSpadden, Ryan P. Kuriakose, Moni A. Markiewicz, Michael R. Chan, Jon M. Platek, Mary E. Ray, Andrew D. Gu, Fangyi Hicks, Wesley L. Singh, Anurag K. Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
title | Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
title_full | Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
title_fullStr | Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
title_short | Matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
title_sort | matched pair analysis to evaluate weight loss during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer as a prognostic factor for survival |
topic | Original Article on Head and Neck Cancers - Disease Biology, Diagnostics, Prevention and Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164548 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanhyeri matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT hermanngregorym matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT masungjun matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT iovoliaustinj matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT wootenkimberlye matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT arshadhassan matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT guptavishal matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT mcspaddenryanp matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT kuriakosemonia matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT markiewiczmichaelr matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT chanjonm matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT platekmarye matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT rayandrewd matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT gufangyi matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT hickswesleyl matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival AT singhanuragk matchedpairanalysistoevaluateweightlossduringradiationtherapyforheadandneckcancerasaprognosticfactorforsurvival |