Cargando…

Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND: To compare head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with three-weekly versus weekly cisplatin-based or other chemotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and CRT with versus without induction chemotherapy (ICT) to investigate differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Hye Ri, Ma, Sung Jun, Hermann, Gregory M., Iovoli, Austin J., Wooten, Kimberly E., Arshad, Hassan, Gupta, Vishal, McSpadden, Ryan P., Kuriakose, Moni A., Markiewicz, Michael R., Chan, Jon M., Platek, Mary E., Ray, Andrew D., Gu, Fangyi, Hicks, Wesley L., Singh, Anurag K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164547
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5032
_version_ 1783704586827071488
author Han, Hye Ri
Ma, Sung Jun
Hermann, Gregory M.
Iovoli, Austin J.
Wooten, Kimberly E.
Arshad, Hassan
Gupta, Vishal
McSpadden, Ryan P.
Kuriakose, Moni A.
Markiewicz, Michael R.
Chan, Jon M.
Platek, Mary E.
Ray, Andrew D.
Gu, Fangyi
Hicks, Wesley L.
Singh, Anurag K.
author_facet Han, Hye Ri
Ma, Sung Jun
Hermann, Gregory M.
Iovoli, Austin J.
Wooten, Kimberly E.
Arshad, Hassan
Gupta, Vishal
McSpadden, Ryan P.
Kuriakose, Moni A.
Markiewicz, Michael R.
Chan, Jon M.
Platek, Mary E.
Ray, Andrew D.
Gu, Fangyi
Hicks, Wesley L.
Singh, Anurag K.
author_sort Han, Hye Ri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with three-weekly versus weekly cisplatin-based or other chemotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and CRT with versus without induction chemotherapy (ICT) to investigate differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: HNC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant CRT at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain three sets of balanced matched pairs: three-weekly and weekly cisplatin CRT, three weekly and non-cisplatin CRT, CRT with and without ICT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate and compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients received either definitive (81%) or post-operative (19%) RT. Of these, 283 patients concurrently received three-weekly cisplatin (45%); 189 patients (30%) received weekly cisplatin; 151 patients (24%) received non-cisplatin regimen. Median follow-up was 55.4 months (interquartile range, 38.0–88.7). Patients who received CRT alone and those who received ICT and CRT had no difference in 5-year OS (51.5% and 41.0% respectively, P=0.53) and CSS (64.9% and 49.7% respectively, P=0.21). Compared to patients who received three-weekly cisplatin, patients who received weekly cisplatin had no difference in 5-year OS (59.3% vs. 54.1%, P=0.35) and CSS (70.3% vs. 62.4%, P=0.09); patients who received non-cisplatin CRT also had no difference in 5-year OS (54.5% vs. 58.3%, P=0.51) and CSS (67.5% vs. 64.7%, P=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in OS and CSS was observed in any of the three pairs of CRT regimens. ICT prior to CRT did not improve survival of CRT alone. Non-cisplatin and weekly cisplatin regimens did not prove to be inferior to the standard three-weekly cisplatin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81844292021-06-22 Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer Han, Hye Ri Ma, Sung Jun Hermann, Gregory M. Iovoli, Austin J. Wooten, Kimberly E. Arshad, Hassan Gupta, Vishal McSpadden, Ryan P. Kuriakose, Moni A. Markiewicz, Michael R. Chan, Jon M. Platek, Mary E. Ray, Andrew D. Gu, Fangyi Hicks, Wesley L. Singh, Anurag K. Ann Transl Med Original Article on Head and Neck Cancers - Disease Biology, Diagnostics, Prevention and Management BACKGROUND: To compare head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with three-weekly versus weekly cisplatin-based or other chemotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and CRT with versus without induction chemotherapy (ICT) to investigate differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: HNC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant CRT at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain three sets of balanced matched pairs: three-weekly and weekly cisplatin CRT, three weekly and non-cisplatin CRT, CRT with and without ICT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate and compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients received either definitive (81%) or post-operative (19%) RT. Of these, 283 patients concurrently received three-weekly cisplatin (45%); 189 patients (30%) received weekly cisplatin; 151 patients (24%) received non-cisplatin regimen. Median follow-up was 55.4 months (interquartile range, 38.0–88.7). Patients who received CRT alone and those who received ICT and CRT had no difference in 5-year OS (51.5% and 41.0% respectively, P=0.53) and CSS (64.9% and 49.7% respectively, P=0.21). Compared to patients who received three-weekly cisplatin, patients who received weekly cisplatin had no difference in 5-year OS (59.3% vs. 54.1%, P=0.35) and CSS (70.3% vs. 62.4%, P=0.09); patients who received non-cisplatin CRT also had no difference in 5-year OS (54.5% vs. 58.3%, P=0.51) and CSS (67.5% vs. 64.7%, P=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in OS and CSS was observed in any of the three pairs of CRT regimens. ICT prior to CRT did not improve survival of CRT alone. Non-cisplatin and weekly cisplatin regimens did not prove to be inferior to the standard three-weekly cisplatin. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8184429/ /pubmed/34164547 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5032 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article on Head and Neck Cancers - Disease Biology, Diagnostics, Prevention and Management
Han, Hye Ri
Ma, Sung Jun
Hermann, Gregory M.
Iovoli, Austin J.
Wooten, Kimberly E.
Arshad, Hassan
Gupta, Vishal
McSpadden, Ryan P.
Kuriakose, Moni A.
Markiewicz, Michael R.
Chan, Jon M.
Platek, Mary E.
Ray, Andrew D.
Gu, Fangyi
Hicks, Wesley L.
Singh, Anurag K.
Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
title Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
title_full Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
title_short Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
title_sort matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer
topic Original Article on Head and Neck Cancers - Disease Biology, Diagnostics, Prevention and Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164547
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5032
work_keys_str_mv AT hanhyeri matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT masungjun matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT hermanngregorym matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT iovoliaustinj matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT wootenkimberlye matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT arshadhassan matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT guptavishal matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT mcspaddenryanp matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT kuriakosemonia matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT markiewiczmichaelr matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT chanjonm matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT platekmarye matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT rayandrewd matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT gufangyi matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT hickswesleyl matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer
AT singhanuragk matchedpairanalysisforcomparisonofsurvivaloutcomeofalternativeregimenstostandardthreeweeklycisplatinbasedconcurrentchemoradiationofheadandneckcancer