Cargando…

Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery

The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bonavina, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164541
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66
_version_ 1783704589941342208
author Bonavina, Luigi
author_facet Bonavina, Luigi
author_sort Bonavina, Luigi
collection PubMed
description The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille’s heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81844422021-06-22 Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery Bonavina, Luigi Ann Transl Med Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille’s heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8184442/ /pubmed/34164541 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery
Bonavina, Luigi
Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
title Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
title_full Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
title_fullStr Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
title_short Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
title_sort progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
topic Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164541
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66
work_keys_str_mv AT bonavinaluigi progressintheesophagogastricanastomosisandthechallengesofminimallyinvasivethoracoscopicsurgery