Cargando…
Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery
The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164541 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66 |
_version_ | 1783704589941342208 |
---|---|
author | Bonavina, Luigi |
author_facet | Bonavina, Luigi |
author_sort | Bonavina, Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille’s heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8184442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81844422021-06-22 Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery Bonavina, Luigi Ann Transl Med Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille’s heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8184442/ /pubmed/34164541 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery Bonavina, Luigi Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
title | Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
title_full | Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
title_fullStr | Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
title_short | Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
title_sort | progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery |
topic | Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164541 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonavinaluigi progressintheesophagogastricanastomosisandthechallengesofminimallyinvasivethoracoscopicsurgery |