Cargando…
Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
BACKGROUND: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery. METHODS: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent opti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164464 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8065 |
_version_ | 1783704599746576384 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Yu Hu, Yijun Quan, Wuxiu Zhang, Bin Wu, Yuqing Wu, Qiaowei Liu, Baoyi Zeng, Xiaomin Lin, Zhanjie Fang, Ying Hu, Yu Feng, Songfu Yuan, Ling Cai, Hongmin Yu, Honghua Li, Tao |
author_facet | Xiao, Yu Hu, Yijun Quan, Wuxiu Zhang, Bin Wu, Yuqing Wu, Qiaowei Liu, Baoyi Zeng, Xiaomin Lin, Zhanjie Fang, Ying Hu, Yu Feng, Songfu Yuan, Ling Cai, Hongmin Yu, Honghua Li, Tao |
author_sort | Xiao, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery. METHODS: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations upon admission and one month after VILMP. First, 1,792 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 768 clinical variables of 256 eyes from two ophthalmic centers were used to train and internally validate ML models. Second, 224 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 96 clinical variables of 32 eyes from the other two centers were utilized for external validation. To fulfill the purpose of predicting postoperative IMH status (i.e., closed or open), five ML algorithms were trained and internally validated by the ten-fold cross-validation method, while the best-performing algorithm was further tested by an external validation set. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the five ML algorithms were 0.882–0.951. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the best-performing algorithm (i.e., random forest, RF) were 0.951, 0.892, 0.973, and 0.904, respectively. In the external validation, the AUC of RF was 0.940, with an accuracy of 0.875, a specificity of 0.875, and a sensitivity of 0.958. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preoperative OCT parameters and clinical variables, our ML model achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting IMH status after VILMP. Therefore, ML models may help optimize surgical planning for IMH patients in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8184483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81844832021-06-22 Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery Xiao, Yu Hu, Yijun Quan, Wuxiu Zhang, Bin Wu, Yuqing Wu, Qiaowei Liu, Baoyi Zeng, Xiaomin Lin, Zhanjie Fang, Ying Hu, Yu Feng, Songfu Yuan, Ling Cai, Hongmin Yu, Honghua Li, Tao Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery. METHODS: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations upon admission and one month after VILMP. First, 1,792 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 768 clinical variables of 256 eyes from two ophthalmic centers were used to train and internally validate ML models. Second, 224 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 96 clinical variables of 32 eyes from the other two centers were utilized for external validation. To fulfill the purpose of predicting postoperative IMH status (i.e., closed or open), five ML algorithms were trained and internally validated by the ten-fold cross-validation method, while the best-performing algorithm was further tested by an external validation set. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the five ML algorithms were 0.882–0.951. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the best-performing algorithm (i.e., random forest, RF) were 0.951, 0.892, 0.973, and 0.904, respectively. In the external validation, the AUC of RF was 0.940, with an accuracy of 0.875, a specificity of 0.875, and a sensitivity of 0.958. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preoperative OCT parameters and clinical variables, our ML model achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting IMH status after VILMP. Therefore, ML models may help optimize surgical planning for IMH patients in the future. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8184483/ /pubmed/34164464 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8065 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Xiao, Yu Hu, Yijun Quan, Wuxiu Zhang, Bin Wu, Yuqing Wu, Qiaowei Liu, Baoyi Zeng, Xiaomin Lin, Zhanjie Fang, Ying Hu, Yu Feng, Songfu Yuan, Ling Cai, Hongmin Yu, Honghua Li, Tao Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
title | Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
title_full | Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
title_fullStr | Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
title_short | Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
title_sort | machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164464 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoyu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT huyijun machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT quanwuxiu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT zhangbin machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT wuyuqing machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT wuqiaowei machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT liubaoyi machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT zengxiaomin machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT linzhanjie machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT fangying machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT huyu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT fengsongfu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT yuanling machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT caihongmin machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT yuhonghua machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery AT litao machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery |