Cargando…

Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery

BACKGROUND: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery. METHODS: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Yu, Hu, Yijun, Quan, Wuxiu, Zhang, Bin, Wu, Yuqing, Wu, Qiaowei, Liu, Baoyi, Zeng, Xiaomin, Lin, Zhanjie, Fang, Ying, Hu, Yu, Feng, Songfu, Yuan, Ling, Cai, Hongmin, Yu, Honghua, Li, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164464
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8065
_version_ 1783704599746576384
author Xiao, Yu
Hu, Yijun
Quan, Wuxiu
Zhang, Bin
Wu, Yuqing
Wu, Qiaowei
Liu, Baoyi
Zeng, Xiaomin
Lin, Zhanjie
Fang, Ying
Hu, Yu
Feng, Songfu
Yuan, Ling
Cai, Hongmin
Yu, Honghua
Li, Tao
author_facet Xiao, Yu
Hu, Yijun
Quan, Wuxiu
Zhang, Bin
Wu, Yuqing
Wu, Qiaowei
Liu, Baoyi
Zeng, Xiaomin
Lin, Zhanjie
Fang, Ying
Hu, Yu
Feng, Songfu
Yuan, Ling
Cai, Hongmin
Yu, Honghua
Li, Tao
author_sort Xiao, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery. METHODS: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations upon admission and one month after VILMP. First, 1,792 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 768 clinical variables of 256 eyes from two ophthalmic centers were used to train and internally validate ML models. Second, 224 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 96 clinical variables of 32 eyes from the other two centers were utilized for external validation. To fulfill the purpose of predicting postoperative IMH status (i.e., closed or open), five ML algorithms were trained and internally validated by the ten-fold cross-validation method, while the best-performing algorithm was further tested by an external validation set. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the five ML algorithms were 0.882–0.951. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the best-performing algorithm (i.e., random forest, RF) were 0.951, 0.892, 0.973, and 0.904, respectively. In the external validation, the AUC of RF was 0.940, with an accuracy of 0.875, a specificity of 0.875, and a sensitivity of 0.958. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preoperative OCT parameters and clinical variables, our ML model achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting IMH status after VILMP. Therefore, ML models may help optimize surgical planning for IMH patients in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81844832021-06-22 Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery Xiao, Yu Hu, Yijun Quan, Wuxiu Zhang, Bin Wu, Yuqing Wu, Qiaowei Liu, Baoyi Zeng, Xiaomin Lin, Zhanjie Fang, Ying Hu, Yu Feng, Songfu Yuan, Ling Cai, Hongmin Yu, Honghua Li, Tao Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To develop a machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the idiopathic macular hole (IMH) status at 1 month after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling (VILMP) surgery. METHODS: A total of 288 IMH eyes from four ophthalmic centers were enrolled. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations upon admission and one month after VILMP. First, 1,792 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 768 clinical variables of 256 eyes from two ophthalmic centers were used to train and internally validate ML models. Second, 224 preoperative macular OCT parameters and 96 clinical variables of 32 eyes from the other two centers were utilized for external validation. To fulfill the purpose of predicting postoperative IMH status (i.e., closed or open), five ML algorithms were trained and internally validated by the ten-fold cross-validation method, while the best-performing algorithm was further tested by an external validation set. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the five ML algorithms were 0.882–0.951. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the best-performing algorithm (i.e., random forest, RF) were 0.951, 0.892, 0.973, and 0.904, respectively. In the external validation, the AUC of RF was 0.940, with an accuracy of 0.875, a specificity of 0.875, and a sensitivity of 0.958. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preoperative OCT parameters and clinical variables, our ML model achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting IMH status after VILMP. Therefore, ML models may help optimize surgical planning for IMH patients in the future. AME Publishing Company 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8184483/ /pubmed/34164464 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8065 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Xiao, Yu
Hu, Yijun
Quan, Wuxiu
Zhang, Bin
Wu, Yuqing
Wu, Qiaowei
Liu, Baoyi
Zeng, Xiaomin
Lin, Zhanjie
Fang, Ying
Hu, Yu
Feng, Songfu
Yuan, Ling
Cai, Hongmin
Yu, Honghua
Li, Tao
Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
title Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
title_full Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
title_fullStr Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
title_short Machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
title_sort machine learning-based prediction of anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164464
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8065
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT huyijun machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT quanwuxiu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT zhangbin machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT wuyuqing machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT wuqiaowei machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT liubaoyi machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT zengxiaomin machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT linzhanjie machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT fangying machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT huyu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT fengsongfu machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT yuanling machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT caihongmin machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT yuhonghua machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery
AT litao machinelearningbasedpredictionofanatomicaloutcomeafteridiopathicmacularholesurgery