Cargando…
Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review
PURPOSE: People with dementia may have indications for aspirin prescription and clinicians are asked to balance the potential risks against benefits. This review examines the evidence for the risk and benefit of long-term aspirin use in people with dementia aged over 65 years, including randomised c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03089-x |
_version_ | 1783704615855849472 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Katrina A. S. Bishara, Delia Molokhia, Mariam Mueller, Christoph Perera, Gayan Stewart, Robert J. |
author_facet | Davis, Katrina A. S. Bishara, Delia Molokhia, Mariam Mueller, Christoph Perera, Gayan Stewart, Robert J. |
author_sort | Davis, Katrina A. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: People with dementia may have indications for aspirin prescription and clinicians are asked to balance the potential risks against benefits. This review examines the evidence for the risk and benefit of long-term aspirin use in people with dementia aged over 65 years, including randomised controlled trials and observational studies. METHODS: We searched three databases for research published between 2007 and 2020. Each eligible article was assessed for risk of bias, and confidence in findings was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Four papers met inclusion criteria: one randomised controlled trial, two cohort studies, and one with pooled data. All looked only at dementia of Alzheimer’s type, and none addressed myocardial or cerebral infarction as outcomes. Dementia progression was reported by two studies, with conflicting results. The trial found no significant effect of aspirin on mortality (odds ratio aspirin vs. no aspirin 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.58–1.97) but found more events of severe bleeding with aspirin (OR aspirin vs. no aspirin 6.9, 1.5–31.2). An excess in intracranial haemorrhage in the aspirin group was judged plausible based on two non-randomised studies. CONCLUSIONS: The review findings are limited because studies include only people with Alzheimer’s-type dementia and lack confirmatory studies, although an increased risk of bleeding events is recognised. Further research that addresses the benefits and risks of aspirin in more representative groups of people with dementia is needed to guide prescribing decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03089-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8184554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81845542021-06-25 Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review Davis, Katrina A. S. Bishara, Delia Molokhia, Mariam Mueller, Christoph Perera, Gayan Stewart, Robert J. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Review PURPOSE: People with dementia may have indications for aspirin prescription and clinicians are asked to balance the potential risks against benefits. This review examines the evidence for the risk and benefit of long-term aspirin use in people with dementia aged over 65 years, including randomised controlled trials and observational studies. METHODS: We searched three databases for research published between 2007 and 2020. Each eligible article was assessed for risk of bias, and confidence in findings was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Four papers met inclusion criteria: one randomised controlled trial, two cohort studies, and one with pooled data. All looked only at dementia of Alzheimer’s type, and none addressed myocardial or cerebral infarction as outcomes. Dementia progression was reported by two studies, with conflicting results. The trial found no significant effect of aspirin on mortality (odds ratio aspirin vs. no aspirin 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.58–1.97) but found more events of severe bleeding with aspirin (OR aspirin vs. no aspirin 6.9, 1.5–31.2). An excess in intracranial haemorrhage in the aspirin group was judged plausible based on two non-randomised studies. CONCLUSIONS: The review findings are limited because studies include only people with Alzheimer’s-type dementia and lack confirmatory studies, although an increased risk of bleeding events is recognised. Further research that addresses the benefits and risks of aspirin in more representative groups of people with dementia is needed to guide prescribing decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03089-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8184554/ /pubmed/33483830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03089-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Davis, Katrina A. S. Bishara, Delia Molokhia, Mariam Mueller, Christoph Perera, Gayan Stewart, Robert J. Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
title | Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
title_full | Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
title_short | Aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
title_sort | aspirin in people with dementia, long-term benefits, and harms: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03089-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviskatrinaas aspirininpeoplewithdementialongtermbenefitsandharmsasystematicreview AT bisharadelia aspirininpeoplewithdementialongtermbenefitsandharmsasystematicreview AT molokhiamariam aspirininpeoplewithdementialongtermbenefitsandharmsasystematicreview AT muellerchristoph aspirininpeoplewithdementialongtermbenefitsandharmsasystematicreview AT pereragayan aspirininpeoplewithdementialongtermbenefitsandharmsasystematicreview AT stewartrobertj aspirininpeoplewithdementialongtermbenefitsandharmsasystematicreview |