Cargando…

Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes

Robotic surgery has progressively gained popularity in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, only a few studies on its oncologic effectiveness are currently present, with contrasting results. The purpose of this study is to report a single surgeon’s experience on robotic rectal resection (RRR) fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiorillo, Claudio, Quero, Giuseppe, Menghi, Roberta, Cina, Caterina, Laterza, Vito, De Sio, Davide, Longo, Fabio, Alfieri, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6
_version_ 1783704617552445440
author Fiorillo, Claudio
Quero, Giuseppe
Menghi, Roberta
Cina, Caterina
Laterza, Vito
De Sio, Davide
Longo, Fabio
Alfieri, Sergio
author_facet Fiorillo, Claudio
Quero, Giuseppe
Menghi, Roberta
Cina, Caterina
Laterza, Vito
De Sio, Davide
Longo, Fabio
Alfieri, Sergio
author_sort Fiorillo, Claudio
collection PubMed
description Robotic surgery has progressively gained popularity in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, only a few studies on its oncologic effectiveness are currently present, with contrasting results. The purpose of this study is to report a single surgeon’s experience on robotic rectal resection (RRR) for cancer, focusing on the analysis of oncologic outcomes, both in terms of pathological features and long-term results. One-hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent RRR for rectal cancer from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients’ characteristics and perioperative outcomes were collected. The analyzed oncologic outcomes were pathological features [distal (DM), circumferential margin (CRM) status and quality of mesorectal excision (TME)] and long-term outcomes [overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. The mean operative time was 275 (± 60.5) minutes. Conversion rate was 6.6%. Complications occurred in 27 cases (22.1%) and reoperation was needed in 2 patients (1.5%). The median follow-up was 30.5 (5.9–86.1) months. None presented DM positivity. CRM positivity was 2.5% (2 cases) while a complete TME was reached in 94.3% of cases (115 patients). Recurrence rate was 5.7% (2 local, 4 distant and 1 local plus distant tumor relapse). OS and DFS were 90.7% and 83%, respectively. At the multivariate analysis, both CRM positivity and near complete/incomplete TME were recognized as negative prognostic factors for OS and DFS. Under appropriate logistic and operative conditions, robotic surgery for rectal cancer proves to be oncologically effective, with adequate pathological results and long-term outcomes. It also offers acceptable peri-operative outcomes, further confirming the safety and feasibility of the technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81845622021-06-11 Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes Fiorillo, Claudio Quero, Giuseppe Menghi, Roberta Cina, Caterina Laterza, Vito De Sio, Davide Longo, Fabio Alfieri, Sergio Updates Surg Original Article Robotic surgery has progressively gained popularity in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, only a few studies on its oncologic effectiveness are currently present, with contrasting results. The purpose of this study is to report a single surgeon’s experience on robotic rectal resection (RRR) for cancer, focusing on the analysis of oncologic outcomes, both in terms of pathological features and long-term results. One-hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent RRR for rectal cancer from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients’ characteristics and perioperative outcomes were collected. The analyzed oncologic outcomes were pathological features [distal (DM), circumferential margin (CRM) status and quality of mesorectal excision (TME)] and long-term outcomes [overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. The mean operative time was 275 (± 60.5) minutes. Conversion rate was 6.6%. Complications occurred in 27 cases (22.1%) and reoperation was needed in 2 patients (1.5%). The median follow-up was 30.5 (5.9–86.1) months. None presented DM positivity. CRM positivity was 2.5% (2 cases) while a complete TME was reached in 94.3% of cases (115 patients). Recurrence rate was 5.7% (2 local, 4 distant and 1 local plus distant tumor relapse). OS and DFS were 90.7% and 83%, respectively. At the multivariate analysis, both CRM positivity and near complete/incomplete TME were recognized as negative prognostic factors for OS and DFS. Under appropriate logistic and operative conditions, robotic surgery for rectal cancer proves to be oncologically effective, with adequate pathological results and long-term outcomes. It also offers acceptable peri-operative outcomes, further confirming the safety and feasibility of the technique. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8184562/ /pubmed/33170489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Fiorillo, Claudio
Quero, Giuseppe
Menghi, Roberta
Cina, Caterina
Laterza, Vito
De Sio, Davide
Longo, Fabio
Alfieri, Sergio
Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
title Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
title_full Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
title_fullStr Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
title_short Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
title_sort robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fiorilloclaudio roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT querogiuseppe roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT menghiroberta roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT cinacaterina roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT laterzavito roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT desiodavide roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT longofabio roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes
AT alfierisergio roboticrectalresectiononcologicoutcomes