Cargando…

Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot

Regional lung cancer screening (LCS) is underway in England, involving a “lung health check” (LHC) and low-dose CT scan for those at high risk of cancer. Incidental findings from LHCs or CTs are usually referred to primary care. We describe the proportion of participants referred from the West Londo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartlett, Emily C., Belsey, Jonathan, Derbyshire, Jane, Morris, Katie, Chen, Michelle, Addis, James, Martins, Maria, Ridge, Carole A., Desai, Sujal R., Mirsadraee, Saeed, Padley, Simon, Whiteside, Sarah, Vaghani, Pritti, Morjaria, Jaymin B., Kemp, Samuel V., Devaraj, Anand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-021-00246-8
_version_ 1783704655795060736
author Bartlett, Emily C.
Belsey, Jonathan
Derbyshire, Jane
Morris, Katie
Chen, Michelle
Addis, James
Martins, Maria
Ridge, Carole A.
Desai, Sujal R.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Padley, Simon
Whiteside, Sarah
Vaghani, Pritti
Morjaria, Jaymin B.
Kemp, Samuel V.
Devaraj, Anand
author_facet Bartlett, Emily C.
Belsey, Jonathan
Derbyshire, Jane
Morris, Katie
Chen, Michelle
Addis, James
Martins, Maria
Ridge, Carole A.
Desai, Sujal R.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Padley, Simon
Whiteside, Sarah
Vaghani, Pritti
Morjaria, Jaymin B.
Kemp, Samuel V.
Devaraj, Anand
author_sort Bartlett, Emily C.
collection PubMed
description Regional lung cancer screening (LCS) is underway in England, involving a “lung health check” (LHC) and low-dose CT scan for those at high risk of cancer. Incidental findings from LHCs or CTs are usually referred to primary care. We describe the proportion of participants referred from the West London LCS pilot to primary care, the indications for referral, the number of general practitioner (GP) attendances and consequent changes to patient management, and provide an estimated cost-burden analysis for primary care. A small proportion (163/1542, 10.6%) of LHC attendees were referred to primary care, primarily for suspected undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (55/163, 33.7%) or for QRISK® (63/163, 38.7%) assessment. Ninety one of 159 (57.2%) participants consenting to follow-up attended GP appointments; costs incurred by primary care were estimated at £5.69/LHC participant. Patient management changes occurred in only 36/159 (22.6%) referred participants. LHCs result in a small increase to primary care workload provided a strict referral protocol is adhered to. Changes to patient management arising from incidental findings referrals are infrequent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81848112021-06-09 Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot Bartlett, Emily C. Belsey, Jonathan Derbyshire, Jane Morris, Katie Chen, Michelle Addis, James Martins, Maria Ridge, Carole A. Desai, Sujal R. Mirsadraee, Saeed Padley, Simon Whiteside, Sarah Vaghani, Pritti Morjaria, Jaymin B. Kemp, Samuel V. Devaraj, Anand NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article Regional lung cancer screening (LCS) is underway in England, involving a “lung health check” (LHC) and low-dose CT scan for those at high risk of cancer. Incidental findings from LHCs or CTs are usually referred to primary care. We describe the proportion of participants referred from the West London LCS pilot to primary care, the indications for referral, the number of general practitioner (GP) attendances and consequent changes to patient management, and provide an estimated cost-burden analysis for primary care. A small proportion (163/1542, 10.6%) of LHC attendees were referred to primary care, primarily for suspected undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (55/163, 33.7%) or for QRISK® (63/163, 38.7%) assessment. Ninety one of 159 (57.2%) participants consenting to follow-up attended GP appointments; costs incurred by primary care were estimated at £5.69/LHC participant. Patient management changes occurred in only 36/159 (22.6%) referred participants. LHCs result in a small increase to primary care workload provided a strict referral protocol is adhered to. Changes to patient management arising from incidental findings referrals are infrequent. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8184811/ /pubmed/34099737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-021-00246-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bartlett, Emily C.
Belsey, Jonathan
Derbyshire, Jane
Morris, Katie
Chen, Michelle
Addis, James
Martins, Maria
Ridge, Carole A.
Desai, Sujal R.
Mirsadraee, Saeed
Padley, Simon
Whiteside, Sarah
Vaghani, Pritti
Morjaria, Jaymin B.
Kemp, Samuel V.
Devaraj, Anand
Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
title Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
title_full Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
title_fullStr Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
title_full_unstemmed Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
title_short Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
title_sort implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a uk pilot
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-021-00246-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bartlettemilyc implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT belseyjonathan implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT derbyshirejane implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT morriskatie implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT chenmichelle implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT addisjames implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT martinsmaria implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT ridgecarolea implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT desaisujalr implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT mirsadraeesaeed implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT padleysimon implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT whitesidesarah implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT vaghanipritti implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT morjariajayminb implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT kempsamuelv implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot
AT devarajanand implicationsofincidentalfindingsfromlungscreeningforprimarycaredatafromaukpilot