Cargando…
Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination
Familiarity of odor–odor combinations is enhanced through food intake in daily life. As familiarity increases, the perceptual boundary between two odors may become ambiguous; therefore, we hypothesized that exposure to one odor would delay detection of the other in a high-familiarity combination but...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91295-z |
_version_ | 1783704657396236288 |
---|---|
author | Gotow, Naomi Hoshi, Ayaka Kobayakawa, Tatsu |
author_facet | Gotow, Naomi Hoshi, Ayaka Kobayakawa, Tatsu |
author_sort | Gotow, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Familiarity of odor–odor combinations is enhanced through food intake in daily life. As familiarity increases, the perceptual boundary between two odors may become ambiguous; therefore, we hypothesized that exposure to one odor would delay detection of the other in a high-familiarity combination but not in a low-familiarity combination. To test this hypothesis, we measured the speed of odor detection using two types of background stimuli (black tea odor and odorless air) and two types of target stimuli (lemon odor and almond odor). For Japanese participants, the combination of black tea and lemon odor has high familiarity, whereas the combination of black tea and almond odors has low familiarity. Reaction time for detection of target stimulus was measured by inserting a pulsed target stimulus into the flow of the background stimulus (i.e., replacing the background stimulus with the target stimulus for a short time). Reaction time for detection of lemon odor was significantly longer under the black tea odor condition than under the odorless air condition. Reaction time for detection of almond odor was similar between the black tea odor and odorless air conditions. These results are in line with the hypothesis that familiarity of an odor–odor combination affects odor detection speed. Further investigations are required to reach more robust conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8184818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81848182021-06-08 Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination Gotow, Naomi Hoshi, Ayaka Kobayakawa, Tatsu Sci Rep Article Familiarity of odor–odor combinations is enhanced through food intake in daily life. As familiarity increases, the perceptual boundary between two odors may become ambiguous; therefore, we hypothesized that exposure to one odor would delay detection of the other in a high-familiarity combination but not in a low-familiarity combination. To test this hypothesis, we measured the speed of odor detection using two types of background stimuli (black tea odor and odorless air) and two types of target stimuli (lemon odor and almond odor). For Japanese participants, the combination of black tea and lemon odor has high familiarity, whereas the combination of black tea and almond odors has low familiarity. Reaction time for detection of target stimulus was measured by inserting a pulsed target stimulus into the flow of the background stimulus (i.e., replacing the background stimulus with the target stimulus for a short time). Reaction time for detection of lemon odor was significantly longer under the black tea odor condition than under the odorless air condition. Reaction time for detection of almond odor was similar between the black tea odor and odorless air conditions. These results are in line with the hypothesis that familiarity of an odor–odor combination affects odor detection speed. Further investigations are required to reach more robust conclusions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8184818/ /pubmed/34099772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91295-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gotow, Naomi Hoshi, Ayaka Kobayakawa, Tatsu Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
title | Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
title_full | Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
title_fullStr | Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
title_full_unstemmed | Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
title_short | Background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
title_sort | background stimulus delays detection of target stimulus in a familiar odor–odor combination |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91295-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotownaomi backgroundstimulusdelaysdetectionoftargetstimulusinafamiliarodorodorcombination AT hoshiayaka backgroundstimulusdelaysdetectionoftargetstimulusinafamiliarodorodorcombination AT kobayakawatatsu backgroundstimulusdelaysdetectionoftargetstimulusinafamiliarodorodorcombination |