Cargando…
Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetiz...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4 |
_version_ | 1783704684939182080 |
---|---|
author | Rhim, I. Coello-Reyes, G. Nauhaus, I. |
author_facet | Rhim, I. Coello-Reyes, G. Nauhaus, I. |
author_sort | Rhim, I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins—M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin—as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1(−/−)) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8184960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81849602021-06-08 Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning Rhim, I. Coello-Reyes, G. Nauhaus, I. Sci Rep Article Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins—M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin—as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1(−/−)) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8184960/ /pubmed/34099749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rhim, I. Coello-Reyes, G. Nauhaus, I. Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
title | Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
title_full | Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
title_fullStr | Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
title_full_unstemmed | Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
title_short | Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
title_sort | variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhimi variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning AT coelloreyesg variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning AT nauhausi variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning |