Cargando…

Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning

Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhim, I., Coello-Reyes, G., Nauhaus, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4
_version_ 1783704684939182080
author Rhim, I.
Coello-Reyes, G.
Nauhaus, I.
author_facet Rhim, I.
Coello-Reyes, G.
Nauhaus, I.
author_sort Rhim, I.
collection PubMed
description Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins—M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin—as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1(−/−)) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8184960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81849602021-06-08 Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning Rhim, I. Coello-Reyes, G. Nauhaus, I. Sci Rep Article Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins—M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin—as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1(−/−)) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8184960/ /pubmed/34099749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rhim, I.
Coello-Reyes, G.
Nauhaus, I.
Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_full Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_fullStr Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_full_unstemmed Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_short Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
title_sort variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90650-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rhimi variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning
AT coelloreyesg variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning
AT nauhausi variationsinphotoreceptorthroughputtomousevisualcortexandtheuniqueeffectsontuning