Cargando…

Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination

BACKGROUND: Abdominal examination (AE), one of the primary diagnostic tools used in traditional Korean medicine (TKM), has a limitation of being subjective due to depending on individual practitioner's experience. Therefore, we devised a novel patient-report pressure algometer (PA) and performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Seok-Jae, Kim, Keun Ho, Lee, Sang Hun, Yim, Mi Hong, Park, Jae-Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100742
_version_ 1783704747293802496
author Ko, Seok-Jae
Kim, Keun Ho
Lee, Sang Hun
Yim, Mi Hong
Park, Jae-Woo
author_facet Ko, Seok-Jae
Kim, Keun Ho
Lee, Sang Hun
Yim, Mi Hong
Park, Jae-Woo
author_sort Ko, Seok-Jae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominal examination (AE), one of the primary diagnostic tools used in traditional Korean medicine (TKM), has a limitation of being subjective due to depending on individual practitioner's experience. Therefore, we devised a novel patient-report pressure algometer (PA) and performed a clinical trial to investigate its validity. METHODS: In total, 44 participants with functional dyspepsia and 44 healthy participants completed the study. The participants were allocated into one of two groups according to the existence of abdominal stiffness at 5 acupoints or abdominal tenderness at 12 acupoints diagnosed by TKM doctors. The pressure depth and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were evaluated using the PA at the same acupoints. We assessed the validity (sensitivity and specificity) of PA and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cutoff value of the test variables (pressure depth and PPT) to criterion standards (abdominal stiffness and tenderness). RESULTS: Pressure depth and PPT assessed by PA showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing abdominal stiffness and tenderness. The validity at CV-14 of diagnosing abdominal tenderness with PPT by PA had a sensitivity of 73.1%, specificity of 77.8%, and an AUC of 0.807 with a P value of < 0.001. CONCLUSION: This study may provide evidence of standardization and quantification of AE through PA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81852392021-06-16 Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination Ko, Seok-Jae Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Sang Hun Yim, Mi Hong Park, Jae-Woo Integr Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Abdominal examination (AE), one of the primary diagnostic tools used in traditional Korean medicine (TKM), has a limitation of being subjective due to depending on individual practitioner's experience. Therefore, we devised a novel patient-report pressure algometer (PA) and performed a clinical trial to investigate its validity. METHODS: In total, 44 participants with functional dyspepsia and 44 healthy participants completed the study. The participants were allocated into one of two groups according to the existence of abdominal stiffness at 5 acupoints or abdominal tenderness at 12 acupoints diagnosed by TKM doctors. The pressure depth and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were evaluated using the PA at the same acupoints. We assessed the validity (sensitivity and specificity) of PA and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cutoff value of the test variables (pressure depth and PPT) to criterion standards (abdominal stiffness and tenderness). RESULTS: Pressure depth and PPT assessed by PA showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing abdominal stiffness and tenderness. The validity at CV-14 of diagnosing abdominal tenderness with PPT by PA had a sensitivity of 73.1%, specificity of 77.8%, and an AUC of 0.807 with a P value of < 0.001. CONCLUSION: This study may provide evidence of standardization and quantification of AE through PA. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8185239/ /pubmed/34141577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100742 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ko, Seok-Jae
Kim, Keun Ho
Lee, Sang Hun
Yim, Mi Hong
Park, Jae-Woo
Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
title Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
title_full Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
title_fullStr Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
title_full_unstemmed Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
title_short Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
title_sort development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100742
work_keys_str_mv AT koseokjae developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination
AT kimkeunho developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination
AT leesanghun developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination
AT yimmihong developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination
AT parkjaewoo developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination