Cargando…
Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination
BACKGROUND: Abdominal examination (AE), one of the primary diagnostic tools used in traditional Korean medicine (TKM), has a limitation of being subjective due to depending on individual practitioner's experience. Therefore, we devised a novel patient-report pressure algometer (PA) and performe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100742 |
_version_ | 1783704747293802496 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Seok-Jae Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Sang Hun Yim, Mi Hong Park, Jae-Woo |
author_facet | Ko, Seok-Jae Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Sang Hun Yim, Mi Hong Park, Jae-Woo |
author_sort | Ko, Seok-Jae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Abdominal examination (AE), one of the primary diagnostic tools used in traditional Korean medicine (TKM), has a limitation of being subjective due to depending on individual practitioner's experience. Therefore, we devised a novel patient-report pressure algometer (PA) and performed a clinical trial to investigate its validity. METHODS: In total, 44 participants with functional dyspepsia and 44 healthy participants completed the study. The participants were allocated into one of two groups according to the existence of abdominal stiffness at 5 acupoints or abdominal tenderness at 12 acupoints diagnosed by TKM doctors. The pressure depth and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were evaluated using the PA at the same acupoints. We assessed the validity (sensitivity and specificity) of PA and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cutoff value of the test variables (pressure depth and PPT) to criterion standards (abdominal stiffness and tenderness). RESULTS: Pressure depth and PPT assessed by PA showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing abdominal stiffness and tenderness. The validity at CV-14 of diagnosing abdominal tenderness with PPT by PA had a sensitivity of 73.1%, specificity of 77.8%, and an AUC of 0.807 with a P value of < 0.001. CONCLUSION: This study may provide evidence of standardization and quantification of AE through PA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81852392021-06-16 Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination Ko, Seok-Jae Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Sang Hun Yim, Mi Hong Park, Jae-Woo Integr Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Abdominal examination (AE), one of the primary diagnostic tools used in traditional Korean medicine (TKM), has a limitation of being subjective due to depending on individual practitioner's experience. Therefore, we devised a novel patient-report pressure algometer (PA) and performed a clinical trial to investigate its validity. METHODS: In total, 44 participants with functional dyspepsia and 44 healthy participants completed the study. The participants were allocated into one of two groups according to the existence of abdominal stiffness at 5 acupoints or abdominal tenderness at 12 acupoints diagnosed by TKM doctors. The pressure depth and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were evaluated using the PA at the same acupoints. We assessed the validity (sensitivity and specificity) of PA and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cutoff value of the test variables (pressure depth and PPT) to criterion standards (abdominal stiffness and tenderness). RESULTS: Pressure depth and PPT assessed by PA showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing abdominal stiffness and tenderness. The validity at CV-14 of diagnosing abdominal tenderness with PPT by PA had a sensitivity of 73.1%, specificity of 77.8%, and an AUC of 0.807 with a P value of < 0.001. CONCLUSION: This study may provide evidence of standardization and quantification of AE through PA. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8185239/ /pubmed/34141577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100742 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ko, Seok-Jae Kim, Keun Ho Lee, Sang Hun Yim, Mi Hong Park, Jae-Woo Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
title | Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
title_full | Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
title_fullStr | Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
title_short | Development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
title_sort | development of a patient-report pressure algometer for the quantification of abdominal examination |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koseokjae developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination AT kimkeunho developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination AT leesanghun developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination AT yimmihong developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination AT parkjaewoo developmentofapatientreportpressurealgometerforthequantificationofabdominalexamination |