Cargando…

The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (CI-RT) in improving meningioma by comparing photon and protons radiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant studies published until March 17, 2021, was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jie-yun, Li, Jing-wen, Jin, Yuan-chang, Li, Mei-xuan, Guo, Li-ping, Bing, Zhi-tong, Zhang, Qiu-ning, Bai, Fei, Wang, Xiao-hu, Li, Xiu-xia, Yang, Ke-hu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.620534
_version_ 1783704771239084032
author Li, Jie-yun
Li, Jing-wen
Jin, Yuan-chang
Li, Mei-xuan
Guo, Li-ping
Bing, Zhi-tong
Zhang, Qiu-ning
Bai, Fei
Wang, Xiao-hu
Li, Xiu-xia
Yang, Ke-hu
author_facet Li, Jie-yun
Li, Jing-wen
Jin, Yuan-chang
Li, Mei-xuan
Guo, Li-ping
Bing, Zhi-tong
Zhang, Qiu-ning
Bai, Fei
Wang, Xiao-hu
Li, Xiu-xia
Yang, Ke-hu
author_sort Li, Jie-yun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (CI-RT) in improving meningioma by comparing photon and protons radiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant studies published until March 17, 2021, was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and EMBASE. Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.0.3. RESULTS: We identified 396 studies, of which 18 studies involving 985 participants were included. Except for one low quality study, the quality of the included studies was found to be either moderate or high quality. The analyses conducted according random effects model indicated that the 1-year overall survival rate (OS) of benign and non-benign meningiomas after the CI-RT treatment was 99% (95%CL=.91-1.00, I (2) = 0%). The overall average 5-year OS for meningiomas was 72% (95%CL=0.52-0.86, I (2) = 35%), not as effective as proton radiotherapy (PR-RT) 85% (95%CL=.72-.93, I (2) = 73, Q=4.17, df=2, p=.12). Additionally, 5-year OS of atypical meningiomas (81%) was found to be significantly higher than anaplastic meningiomas (52%). The 10-year OS after CI-RT of patients with mixed grade meningioma was 91% (95%CL=.75-.97, I (2) = 73%). The 15-year OS after CI-RT 87% (95%CL=.11-1.00) or PR-RT 87% (95%CL=.23-.99, I (2) = 79%) were the same (Q=0, df=1, p=.99). After undergoing CI-RT for 3 and 5 years, the LC for benign meningioma was 100% and 88%, respectively, while the 2-year LC of non-benign meningiomas (atypical/anaplastic) was 33%. Headache, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, and hearing impairment were found to be the most common adverse reactions, with individual incidences of 19.4%, 23.7%, 9.1%, and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CI-RT is a rapidly developing technique that has been proven to be an effective treatment against meningioma. The efficacy and safety of CI-RT for meningiomas were similar to those of PR-RT, better than photon radiotherapy (PH-RT). However, there is a need for more prospective trials in the future that can help provide more supportive evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81853432021-06-09 The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Li, Jie-yun Li, Jing-wen Jin, Yuan-chang Li, Mei-xuan Guo, Li-ping Bing, Zhi-tong Zhang, Qiu-ning Bai, Fei Wang, Xiao-hu Li, Xiu-xia Yang, Ke-hu Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (CI-RT) in improving meningioma by comparing photon and protons radiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant studies published until March 17, 2021, was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and EMBASE. Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.0.3. RESULTS: We identified 396 studies, of which 18 studies involving 985 participants were included. Except for one low quality study, the quality of the included studies was found to be either moderate or high quality. The analyses conducted according random effects model indicated that the 1-year overall survival rate (OS) of benign and non-benign meningiomas after the CI-RT treatment was 99% (95%CL=.91-1.00, I (2) = 0%). The overall average 5-year OS for meningiomas was 72% (95%CL=0.52-0.86, I (2) = 35%), not as effective as proton radiotherapy (PR-RT) 85% (95%CL=.72-.93, I (2) = 73, Q=4.17, df=2, p=.12). Additionally, 5-year OS of atypical meningiomas (81%) was found to be significantly higher than anaplastic meningiomas (52%). The 10-year OS after CI-RT of patients with mixed grade meningioma was 91% (95%CL=.75-.97, I (2) = 73%). The 15-year OS after CI-RT 87% (95%CL=.11-1.00) or PR-RT 87% (95%CL=.23-.99, I (2) = 79%) were the same (Q=0, df=1, p=.99). After undergoing CI-RT for 3 and 5 years, the LC for benign meningioma was 100% and 88%, respectively, while the 2-year LC of non-benign meningiomas (atypical/anaplastic) was 33%. Headache, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, and hearing impairment were found to be the most common adverse reactions, with individual incidences of 19.4%, 23.7%, 9.1%, and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CI-RT is a rapidly developing technique that has been proven to be an effective treatment against meningioma. The efficacy and safety of CI-RT for meningiomas were similar to those of PR-RT, better than photon radiotherapy (PH-RT). However, there is a need for more prospective trials in the future that can help provide more supportive evidence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8185343/ /pubmed/34113557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.620534 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Li, Jin, Li, Guo, Bing, Zhang, Bai, Wang, Li and Yang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Li, Jie-yun
Li, Jing-wen
Jin, Yuan-chang
Li, Mei-xuan
Guo, Li-ping
Bing, Zhi-tong
Zhang, Qiu-ning
Bai, Fei
Wang, Xiao-hu
Li, Xiu-xia
Yang, Ke-hu
The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.620534
work_keys_str_mv AT lijieyun theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijingwen theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinyuanchang theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limeixuan theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guoliping theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bingzhitong theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangqiuning theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baifei theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaohu theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiuxia theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangkehu theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijieyun efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijingwen efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinyuanchang efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limeixuan efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guoliping efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bingzhitong efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangqiuning efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baifei efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaohu efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiuxia efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangkehu efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis