Cargando…
The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (CI-RT) in improving meningioma by comparing photon and protons radiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant studies published until March 17, 2021, was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.620534 |
_version_ | 1783704771239084032 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jie-yun Li, Jing-wen Jin, Yuan-chang Li, Mei-xuan Guo, Li-ping Bing, Zhi-tong Zhang, Qiu-ning Bai, Fei Wang, Xiao-hu Li, Xiu-xia Yang, Ke-hu |
author_facet | Li, Jie-yun Li, Jing-wen Jin, Yuan-chang Li, Mei-xuan Guo, Li-ping Bing, Zhi-tong Zhang, Qiu-ning Bai, Fei Wang, Xiao-hu Li, Xiu-xia Yang, Ke-hu |
author_sort | Li, Jie-yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (CI-RT) in improving meningioma by comparing photon and protons radiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant studies published until March 17, 2021, was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and EMBASE. Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.0.3. RESULTS: We identified 396 studies, of which 18 studies involving 985 participants were included. Except for one low quality study, the quality of the included studies was found to be either moderate or high quality. The analyses conducted according random effects model indicated that the 1-year overall survival rate (OS) of benign and non-benign meningiomas after the CI-RT treatment was 99% (95%CL=.91-1.00, I (2) = 0%). The overall average 5-year OS for meningiomas was 72% (95%CL=0.52-0.86, I (2) = 35%), not as effective as proton radiotherapy (PR-RT) 85% (95%CL=.72-.93, I (2) = 73, Q=4.17, df=2, p=.12). Additionally, 5-year OS of atypical meningiomas (81%) was found to be significantly higher than anaplastic meningiomas (52%). The 10-year OS after CI-RT of patients with mixed grade meningioma was 91% (95%CL=.75-.97, I (2) = 73%). The 15-year OS after CI-RT 87% (95%CL=.11-1.00) or PR-RT 87% (95%CL=.23-.99, I (2) = 79%) were the same (Q=0, df=1, p=.99). After undergoing CI-RT for 3 and 5 years, the LC for benign meningioma was 100% and 88%, respectively, while the 2-year LC of non-benign meningiomas (atypical/anaplastic) was 33%. Headache, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, and hearing impairment were found to be the most common adverse reactions, with individual incidences of 19.4%, 23.7%, 9.1%, and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CI-RT is a rapidly developing technique that has been proven to be an effective treatment against meningioma. The efficacy and safety of CI-RT for meningiomas were similar to those of PR-RT, better than photon radiotherapy (PH-RT). However, there is a need for more prospective trials in the future that can help provide more supportive evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81853432021-06-09 The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Li, Jie-yun Li, Jing-wen Jin, Yuan-chang Li, Mei-xuan Guo, Li-ping Bing, Zhi-tong Zhang, Qiu-ning Bai, Fei Wang, Xiao-hu Li, Xiu-xia Yang, Ke-hu Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (CI-RT) in improving meningioma by comparing photon and protons radiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant studies published until March 17, 2021, was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and EMBASE. Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.0.3. RESULTS: We identified 396 studies, of which 18 studies involving 985 participants were included. Except for one low quality study, the quality of the included studies was found to be either moderate or high quality. The analyses conducted according random effects model indicated that the 1-year overall survival rate (OS) of benign and non-benign meningiomas after the CI-RT treatment was 99% (95%CL=.91-1.00, I (2) = 0%). The overall average 5-year OS for meningiomas was 72% (95%CL=0.52-0.86, I (2) = 35%), not as effective as proton radiotherapy (PR-RT) 85% (95%CL=.72-.93, I (2) = 73, Q=4.17, df=2, p=.12). Additionally, 5-year OS of atypical meningiomas (81%) was found to be significantly higher than anaplastic meningiomas (52%). The 10-year OS after CI-RT of patients with mixed grade meningioma was 91% (95%CL=.75-.97, I (2) = 73%). The 15-year OS after CI-RT 87% (95%CL=.11-1.00) or PR-RT 87% (95%CL=.23-.99, I (2) = 79%) were the same (Q=0, df=1, p=.99). After undergoing CI-RT for 3 and 5 years, the LC for benign meningioma was 100% and 88%, respectively, while the 2-year LC of non-benign meningiomas (atypical/anaplastic) was 33%. Headache, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, and hearing impairment were found to be the most common adverse reactions, with individual incidences of 19.4%, 23.7%, 9.1%, and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CI-RT is a rapidly developing technique that has been proven to be an effective treatment against meningioma. The efficacy and safety of CI-RT for meningiomas were similar to those of PR-RT, better than photon radiotherapy (PH-RT). However, there is a need for more prospective trials in the future that can help provide more supportive evidence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8185343/ /pubmed/34113557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.620534 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Li, Jin, Li, Guo, Bing, Zhang, Bai, Wang, Li and Yang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Li, Jie-yun Li, Jing-wen Jin, Yuan-chang Li, Mei-xuan Guo, Li-ping Bing, Zhi-tong Zhang, Qiu-ning Bai, Fei Wang, Xiao-hu Li, Xiu-xia Yang, Ke-hu The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.620534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijieyun theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijingwen theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinyuanchang theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limeixuan theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guoliping theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bingzhitong theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangqiuning theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baifei theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaohu theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lixiuxia theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangkehu theefficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijieyun efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijingwen efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinyuanchang efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limeixuan efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guoliping efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bingzhitong efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangqiuning efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baifei efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaohu efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lixiuxia efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangkehu efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyformeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |