Cargando…
What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
Introduction: The therapeutic rationale varies among tinnitus therapies. A recent study identified which outcome measures should be used for different types of interventions. What patients consider the most important outcome measure in tinnitus therapy is unclear. Objectives: To study the preference...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668880 |
_version_ | 1783704774245351424 |
---|---|
author | Rademaker, Maaike M. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Stokroos, Robert J. Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge |
author_facet | Rademaker, Maaike M. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Stokroos, Robert J. Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge |
author_sort | Rademaker, Maaike M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The therapeutic rationale varies among tinnitus therapies. A recent study identified which outcome measures should be used for different types of interventions. What patients consider the most important outcome measure in tinnitus therapy is unclear. Objectives: To study the preference of the tinnitus patient for different outcome measures in tinnitus therapy. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Participants were provided with two alternatives per choice set (nine choice sets total). Each choice-set consisted of four attributes (tinnitus loudness, tinnitus acceptance, quality of sleep and concentration). With a difference in one of three levels (increased, similar or decreased after treatment) between the alternatives. Results were analyzed with a mixed logit model. Preference heterogeneity was explored with covariates, correlating attributes and a latent class analysis. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven participants took part. In the mixed logit models we found that the choice for a tinnitus therapy was significantly affected by all levels of the outcomes, except for a similar level in concentration and tinnitus acceptance. Tinnitus loudness was considered the most important outcome measure relative to the other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was not explained by correlating attributes. The latent class analysis identified two classes. The first class was similar to the mixed logit analysis, except for a non-significance of similar quality of sleep and tinnitus acceptance. The second class showed a statistical significant preference only for increased tinnitus acceptance and similar quality of sleep. Conclusion: Based on this study, tinnitus patients consider loudness the most important outcome measure. However, there is a variance in preference as indicated by the latent class analysis. This study underlines the importance of research into tinnitus heterogeneity. Next, this study highlights the need for research into tinnitus therapies that focus on diminishing tinnitus loudness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8185356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81853562021-06-09 What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment Rademaker, Maaike M. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Stokroos, Robert J. Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: The therapeutic rationale varies among tinnitus therapies. A recent study identified which outcome measures should be used for different types of interventions. What patients consider the most important outcome measure in tinnitus therapy is unclear. Objectives: To study the preference of the tinnitus patient for different outcome measures in tinnitus therapy. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Participants were provided with two alternatives per choice set (nine choice sets total). Each choice-set consisted of four attributes (tinnitus loudness, tinnitus acceptance, quality of sleep and concentration). With a difference in one of three levels (increased, similar or decreased after treatment) between the alternatives. Results were analyzed with a mixed logit model. Preference heterogeneity was explored with covariates, correlating attributes and a latent class analysis. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven participants took part. In the mixed logit models we found that the choice for a tinnitus therapy was significantly affected by all levels of the outcomes, except for a similar level in concentration and tinnitus acceptance. Tinnitus loudness was considered the most important outcome measure relative to the other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was not explained by correlating attributes. The latent class analysis identified two classes. The first class was similar to the mixed logit analysis, except for a non-significance of similar quality of sleep and tinnitus acceptance. The second class showed a statistical significant preference only for increased tinnitus acceptance and similar quality of sleep. Conclusion: Based on this study, tinnitus patients consider loudness the most important outcome measure. However, there is a variance in preference as indicated by the latent class analysis. This study underlines the importance of research into tinnitus heterogeneity. Next, this study highlights the need for research into tinnitus therapies that focus on diminishing tinnitus loudness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8185356/ /pubmed/34113313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668880 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rademaker, Essers, Stokroos, Smit and Stegeman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Rademaker, Maaike M. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Stokroos, Robert J. Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment |
title | What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_full | What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_fullStr | What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_short | What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_sort | what tinnitus therapy outcome measures are important for patients?– a discrete choice experiment |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rademakermaaikem whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment AT essersbrigitteab whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment AT stokroosrobertj whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment AT smitadrianal whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment AT stegemaninge whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment |