Cargando…

What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment

Introduction: The therapeutic rationale varies among tinnitus therapies. A recent study identified which outcome measures should be used for different types of interventions. What patients consider the most important outcome measure in tinnitus therapy is unclear. Objectives: To study the preference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rademaker, Maaike M., Essers, Brigitte A. B., Stokroos, Robert J., Smit, Adriana L., Stegeman, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668880
_version_ 1783704774245351424
author Rademaker, Maaike M.
Essers, Brigitte A. B.
Stokroos, Robert J.
Smit, Adriana L.
Stegeman, Inge
author_facet Rademaker, Maaike M.
Essers, Brigitte A. B.
Stokroos, Robert J.
Smit, Adriana L.
Stegeman, Inge
author_sort Rademaker, Maaike M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The therapeutic rationale varies among tinnitus therapies. A recent study identified which outcome measures should be used for different types of interventions. What patients consider the most important outcome measure in tinnitus therapy is unclear. Objectives: To study the preference of the tinnitus patient for different outcome measures in tinnitus therapy. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Participants were provided with two alternatives per choice set (nine choice sets total). Each choice-set consisted of four attributes (tinnitus loudness, tinnitus acceptance, quality of sleep and concentration). With a difference in one of three levels (increased, similar or decreased after treatment) between the alternatives. Results were analyzed with a mixed logit model. Preference heterogeneity was explored with covariates, correlating attributes and a latent class analysis. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven participants took part. In the mixed logit models we found that the choice for a tinnitus therapy was significantly affected by all levels of the outcomes, except for a similar level in concentration and tinnitus acceptance. Tinnitus loudness was considered the most important outcome measure relative to the other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was not explained by correlating attributes. The latent class analysis identified two classes. The first class was similar to the mixed logit analysis, except for a non-significance of similar quality of sleep and tinnitus acceptance. The second class showed a statistical significant preference only for increased tinnitus acceptance and similar quality of sleep. Conclusion: Based on this study, tinnitus patients consider loudness the most important outcome measure. However, there is a variance in preference as indicated by the latent class analysis. This study underlines the importance of research into tinnitus heterogeneity. Next, this study highlights the need for research into tinnitus therapies that focus on diminishing tinnitus loudness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8185356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81853562021-06-09 What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment Rademaker, Maaike M. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Stokroos, Robert J. Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: The therapeutic rationale varies among tinnitus therapies. A recent study identified which outcome measures should be used for different types of interventions. What patients consider the most important outcome measure in tinnitus therapy is unclear. Objectives: To study the preference of the tinnitus patient for different outcome measures in tinnitus therapy. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted. Participants were provided with two alternatives per choice set (nine choice sets total). Each choice-set consisted of four attributes (tinnitus loudness, tinnitus acceptance, quality of sleep and concentration). With a difference in one of three levels (increased, similar or decreased after treatment) between the alternatives. Results were analyzed with a mixed logit model. Preference heterogeneity was explored with covariates, correlating attributes and a latent class analysis. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven participants took part. In the mixed logit models we found that the choice for a tinnitus therapy was significantly affected by all levels of the outcomes, except for a similar level in concentration and tinnitus acceptance. Tinnitus loudness was considered the most important outcome measure relative to the other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was not explained by correlating attributes. The latent class analysis identified two classes. The first class was similar to the mixed logit analysis, except for a non-significance of similar quality of sleep and tinnitus acceptance. The second class showed a statistical significant preference only for increased tinnitus acceptance and similar quality of sleep. Conclusion: Based on this study, tinnitus patients consider loudness the most important outcome measure. However, there is a variance in preference as indicated by the latent class analysis. This study underlines the importance of research into tinnitus heterogeneity. Next, this study highlights the need for research into tinnitus therapies that focus on diminishing tinnitus loudness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8185356/ /pubmed/34113313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668880 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rademaker, Essers, Stokroos, Smit and Stegeman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Rademaker, Maaike M.
Essers, Brigitte A. B.
Stokroos, Robert J.
Smit, Adriana L.
Stegeman, Inge
What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
title What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_fullStr What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full_unstemmed What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_short What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_sort what tinnitus therapy outcome measures are important for patients?– a discrete choice experiment
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668880
work_keys_str_mv AT rademakermaaikem whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT essersbrigitteab whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT stokroosrobertj whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT smitadrianal whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT stegemaninge whattinnitustherapyoutcomemeasuresareimportantforpatientsadiscretechoiceexperiment